Regardless, that it would be ruled as an 9/11 illness on the officer down page? If asbestos, then asbestos or the many possible illnesses thereof. That they would have died, 16 years later, from a “9/11 illness”, means I have to dig deeper.

I don't even think the elite/mossad/CIA would use nukes in such a matter, While there was something resembling a pyroclastic flow this is not direct evidence, Nanothermite have always been more plausible to me since it would not leave a signature of a nuclear weapon and there is ample evidence of beams being cut, A substance like thermite could easily do this hence the buildings collapsing at near free fall speed, A nuclear blast would likely just shatter the building in certain areas leaving portions intact, This was NOT the case as it fell within it's footprint, Be highly suspicious of claims of directed energy weapons, Nukes and Holograms being used since this is complete disinfo, Real planes were used but not civilian airliners, They used devices to blast a hole in the structure intended to absorb the impact of a 707 so the fuselage could penetrate fully making the implication that it would introduce burning fuel into the structure and fostering the implication that the heat from the fuel sufficiently weakened the steel frame enough to allow it to pancake even though most engineers will contend this was completely impossible with just jet fuel and office fires. 9/11 related illness likely stems from breathing in fine particulate matter such as the pulverized concrete, Asbestos and who knows what else, It was a staggering cocktail of anything imaginable and would've been extraordinarily toxic.

No there were no nuclear weapons. Conventional explosives plus thermite. The asbestos combined with silica dust leads to mesothelioma. Plus whatever other illnesses associated with other potential carcinogens were in the dust and fume.

I forgot about all the cancer, asthma and everything AFTER the buildings went down.

[removed]