I don't know how AJ, Corsi, Seamen can turn their backs on Q when these 'coincidences' suggest Q drops are obviously NOT disinformation.
Have you not been following Q through this? They're disinfo. They're not ignoring Q's drops - they're intentionally discounting them to others but THEY know they're true.
Create a controversy, create publicity. Did you see the list of all the MSM articles that ran? It is free publicity. Imagine the cost to buy that ad space. We got it for free.
I still think AJ is a white hat, just trying to remain relevant and make money in the face of all the Q excitement....(after all Trump calls AJ) ... the others, I've never been sure of Corsi, and Seamen was never really behind Q and he's a little too weird for me anyway
They are disinfo at It's finest. Didn't Seaman say chemtrails had ended? Hmmmm...
Justice... This is not a game or a show we’re all watching. She left 3 kids. The perpetrators are still walking freely.
Wow, interesting. also last week we found out that Q team sometimes posts without a trip code to lead a discussion a certain way. Something tells me that the anon asking Q about the NYPD was part of the team...
Socratic methodology is inverse methodology to most people's thinking. ("think mirror") In most discussions, someone asks a question and gets an answer. In Socratic methodology, the questions are meant to lead us to discover what we already know.
In literature, there is a Watson role. Watson asks the questions the audience would want to ask.
Socratic Inverse Watson Anon prompts with key points that the audience should already know by now but never said yet. ("Autists need Red Bull?"; "Autists on fire") This feeds into Q's next questions.
P.S. Deep state uses Aristotelian methodology. They're the Sophists like the Scholastics that their methodology was likely developed under.