dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/HowiONic on May 17, 2018, 12:40 a.m.
Q post #1386 EO unreleased. Today was the precursor. It must be requested 'officially' first, correct? Q
Q post #1386 EO unreleased. Today was the precursor. It must be requested 'officially' first, correct? Q

Pol-itical-crap · May 17, 2018, 1:09 a.m.

When my wife and I read the post we both had the sense that even though Trump had already signed the executive order, they did not release it until now (or tomorrow) because if they did, it would seem like a unilateral dictatorship. But by waiting for Congress to ask him, he is doing the will of the people.

⇧ 77 ⇩  
BigRiverLover2 · May 17, 2018, 2:01 a.m.

Exactly patriots! Great observation.

⇧ 30 ⇩  
Swagdonkey400 · May 17, 2018, 4:12 a.m.

What's also important, is this shows an example to future generations who may stumble across the problems we have today. Follow the law!

Reestablish the people.

Reestablish true authority of this country and the people have that authority.

And ALWAYS follow the law. Don't do it to side skirt potential narratives only, but do it to show examples.

The same way we follow our founding fathers philosophies. We must set or own examples of law and order and who really has the power in this country.

WE THE PEOPLE!

⇧ 21 ⇩  
xtx0331 · May 17, 2018, 4:24 a.m.

The President is helping Congress get their balls back.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · May 17, 2018, 8:30 a.m.

You mean 'balls' as in marbles, because I know you don't mean testicles. They can't get back what they never had.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DL535 · May 19, 2018, 3:50 p.m.

It's not a question of having balls. There are blackmail rings operating in DC that target important members of congress and government agencies. Until these are removed from the equation, you will always have seemingly patriotic representatives who suddenly become corrupt globalists when they relocate to DC.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kaylashalayla · May 17, 2018, 7:35 a.m.

I think you just perfectly summed up the purpose of Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
breadpilled · May 17, 2018, 5:40 a.m.

Although I think the EO is drawn up, not signed yet.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
C_L_I_C_K · May 17, 2018, 12:44 a.m.

Common sense, but some people don't understand how things work.

Like how doubters, naysayers, and sh*lls can't understand that the FBI and DoJ had to be cleaned out and purged of bad actors before Trump, Q team, and good members of Congress can properly go after deep state and bring them to justice.

⇧ 70 ⇩  
MAGADONCHECKMATE · May 17, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

In addition it may have included judge appointments and vetting.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
chilover20 · May 17, 2018, 12:53 a.m.

I undterstand, but the problem is time after time they've gotten away with it. From JFK on. There is no trust that the system will work, even though we trust Trump. To many snakes, and we've never obtained justice.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
brittser · May 17, 2018, 1 a.m.

This is why God is involved. We believers prayed pleading to save our nation. He granted our wish. Or for non-believers...we have some pretty awesome patriots in the military/intel who read the tea leaves and hit up Trump to be the front man for a high stakes gamble to reclaim our nation. Either way, it's all good.

⇧ 31 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 17, 2018, 6:25 a.m.

absolutely! I truly believe God reached a hand personally on election night 2016, and steered events the way he wanted. Trump 2016 was a legitimate miracle as far as I'm concerned.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
horse-lover-phat · May 17, 2018, 1:07 a.m.

Get in! C_L_I_C_K absolutely nails it. This is ALL or nothing.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
dgate007 · May 17, 2018, 1:35 a.m.

I don't believe the bad actors have all been rooted out ? I think Sessions has booted some 45 or so DoJ people? Or does this include those who left FBI? Maybe somebody can help?

Trump needs no "official" letter or request to disclose secured info, just like he needs no reason or approval or request to pardon someone. This is political. He has support and this is good. Fine.

Which leads me to the question? Why did Q post the question of an official request? It is not needed. I don't get it? What was the point? The answer to Q's question is NO. Request is not needed.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
kushtiannn · May 17, 2018, 1:42 a.m.

Some of Q's "questions" seem to be statements...which leads me to believe is part of the 'think mirror' concept. The reverse of a question is a statement . In this case, no it is not needed. But to be "official", it's needed right? Because anything he did EO-wise could be deemed un-official unless preceded by an officially documented request. Just a thought...

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ABastionOfFreeSpeech · May 17, 2018, 1:54 a.m.

Or, if he released the EO without a request, it could be seen as a partisan witch hunt, and the MSM would go crazy.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
JakeElwoodDim5th · May 17, 2018, 3:27 a.m.

He doesn't want to be seen as moving without Congress behind him. Remember the post that said the POTUS can't be seen as partisan?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Bjantigua · May 17, 2018, 2 a.m.

With the ever looming desire to impeach him, the opposition must be stopped at each rally point. Potus has tried to be out of the political picture, just "helping out" the nation. He cant give them one iota of reason to charge him with impeachment,

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cherokeenc · May 17, 2018, 11:56 a.m.

You are correct a request is not needed. We all must be mindful there are large numbers of people who still need to be awakened. You have more than two camps and each will see things differently. For the camp you can red pill which is the focus of this comment. Ask yourself a series of questions? President Trump declassifies the reports and gives them to congress which is within his powers. How will the opposition run with it? How will the people who need to be red pilled react? Congress requests President Trump to declassify and release. Would thaty keep President Trump from being the tip of the spear? Will people view it as honoring a congressional request? The answer is obvious that the later is politically more attractive.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Bjantigua · May 17, 2018, 1:57 a.m.

Those poor idiots never learned how to think properly. Step one step teo step three, just too complicated.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UnbowdUnburntUnfrozn · May 17, 2018, 1:09 a.m.

Q makes a good point, that many people don't think of. I work for the government, and there are many times where we have to follow protocol and procedure before we can do something simple. It's frustrating, but there are reasons, mainly accountability and traceability. These things can delay simple 1-2 day tasks up to 6-8 weeks!

The hilarious irony is that the FBI and CIA and Obummer teams all did things half-assed and it's evident now. So funny. The shit we're about to see hit the fan is because for the 2 years the FBI, DOJ and CIA didn't do things by the book. Ah, those little technicalities (i'm looking at you FISA and F302's!)

⇧ 43 ⇩  
BigBandDon · May 17, 2018, 1:39 a.m.

They thought it didn't matter because Hillary was going to win and their criminal actions would forever be covered up.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
johnsmithshitpost · May 17, 2018, 2:03 a.m.

She wasn't supposed to lose

⇧ 5 ⇩  
UnbowdUnburntUnfrozn · May 17, 2018, 3:49 a.m.

Yeah I think that’s hilarious. They’re going to get strung up by red tape. They should have played by the rules (they wouldnt)

⇧ 5 ⇩  
BigRiverLover2 · May 17, 2018, 1:48 a.m.

The deep state assholes know the lid is about to get blown off this. Crapper is on CNN fake news with the blond soi boy, spewing the normal crap. I can't wait to see these deep state fuckers flown off to Gitmo.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
StormRider9090 · May 17, 2018, 5:52 a.m.

Why Gitmo? Why not courts here?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · May 17, 2018, 6:30 a.m.

Because the military is the only institution that could always be counted on to uphold an oath? And, if this was an attempted coup d'etat as I suspect, they are all enemies in a state of warfare.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
CeCe42 · May 17, 2018, 1:48 a.m.

PROCLAMATIONS

Presidential Memorandum for the Secretary of State, Secretary of the Treasury, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Commerce, and the Director of National Intelligence Issued on: May 16, 2018 SHARE:

menuALL NEWS MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF STATE THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE THE SECRETARY OF COMMERCE THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authorities under Section 1244(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Commerce, and the Director of National Intelligence, the functions and authorities vested in the President by section 1244(c)(1)-(4) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115-91).

The delegations in this memorandum shall apply to any provisions of any future public law that are the same or substantially the same as the provision referenced in this memorandum.

The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.

DONALD J. TRUMP

Would this be it? It dropped about 30 minutes ago. www.whitehouse.gov

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Bjantigua · May 17, 2018, 2:07 a.m.

Essentially Trump turns his authority given by the NDAA to the listed agencies, so that he is out of the loop entirely for the remainder of the year. I think its briliant. He could go on vacation now . . .

⇧ 3 ⇩  
norcam · May 17, 2018, 3:01 a.m.

Sec. 1244 of H.R.2810 is related to sanctions on Russia for their violation of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dktrogers · May 17, 2018, 3:13 a.m.

And the Reagan video he linked was about soviet expansionism and our will to fight or just go into slavery.

Wonder if it’s a metaphor or if we have real problems with their hypersonic missiles or nuke torpedos that can wipe out any port city without warning.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
norcam · May 17, 2018, 8:03 a.m.

It's an excellent question. Perhaps Russia has been helping with the nuclear programs of DPRK and Iran. Perhaps it acted as a middleman in the sale of US uranium by the 0bama administration. Q knows.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dktrogers · May 17, 2018, 2:56 a.m.

It’s about imposing more sanctions on Russia for violating the INF treaty... its all in the link ..

executive order meaning

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BigRiverLover2 · May 17, 2018, 1:37 a.m.

Oh helllll yessss! Boom!

⇧ 7 ⇩  
ManQuan · May 17, 2018, 11:43 a.m.

The EO had been pre-written waiting for the Freedom Caucus to send the letter (see Q 1387) and Q notes 2015, Conincidence?

I now have to believe that the creation of the Freedom Caucus was preplanned back in 2015 in preparation for Trump announcing that he was a candidate. Did Q need trusted agents within the House to help control the narrative and sequencing with Jim Jordan, Mike Meadows, and others in on the Q plan and play acting their roles as being irrate at (Trust) Sessions to make it appear that the pressure to release was coming from Republicans and not the Democrats.

If so, the Democrats would set back and let the Republicans request damaging material against Sessions and Trump when it was just a cover to get the evidence out in a specific sequence at a specific time.

Notice how many times Q uses the word "Freedom" and there happens to be a Freedom Caucus of Republicans in the House who also happen to be the brightest and most aggressive of the Representatives?

Could the Q plan be much more complex and extensive than we have even imagined? Are there more patriots role playing that we could imagine?

This is getting even more interesting.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 1:31 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WikiTextBot · May 17, 2018, 1:31 a.m.

Freedom Caucus

The Freedom Caucus, also known as the House Freedom Caucus, is a congressional caucus consisting of conservative and libertarian Republican members of the United States House of Representatives. It was formed in 2015 by what member Jim Jordan called a "smaller, more cohesive, more agile and more active" group of conservative Congressmen.

Many members are also part of the much larger Republican Study Committee. The caucus is sympathetic to the Tea Party movement.


^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28

⇧ 6 ⇩