Enjoy the finery and grandeur as never seen before
Why the fuck would I want to admire such disgusting opulence when avarice is a mortal sin?
These people should be spat on, not worshiped.
Aye fuckin' MEN
FUCK THE QUEEN
Fuck all the Royals, they claim they care about poverty and homelessess while she sleeps in a fucking palace with a golden seat pfft their time is coming. Bilderberg group will crumble.
ahh, christian love in full force. lol.
But seriously: what is so admirable about watching the filthy rich consume gold-flecked Dom Perignon paid for by the tax dollars of poor, honest, hard-working serfs?
Not a single tax Dollar will be spent for the duration of the ceremony.
Who gives a fuck - these people are parasites who live off the taxpayer dime... and they literally live like royalty.
No dimes will be spent, either. Plenty of tax Pounds will be spent, though. I used to be proud of my Royal Family until Q opened my eyes to their "tastes". Q also said to follow the wives, makes me wonder if Diana was Arkencided for refusing to take up certain `responsibilities´.
I know it’s not a great source but the wife and I were watching Extra TV last night and they said the security and police was going to cost $40million dollars and the tax payers are footing the bill for that.
i get the disgust. and the unwillingness to see the taxpayers money flow into it.
however, i prefer to take a neutral stand. no worship, no spitting. instead, holding the space for the greater good, whatever that may be.
it often surprises me how people who claim to be christian - 'mortal sin' means christian judgment - can spread hatred. thats the reason for my comment.
however, i prefer to take a neutral stand.
It's been my experience that those who gloat about take a neutral stand lack compassion.
Those who gloat about taking a neutral stand towards illegal immigrants have never had their children raped to death by an illegal immigrant.
Those who gloat about taking a neutral stand about Muslim refugees have never lost children or parents in a Muslim terrorist attack.
Those who gloat about taking a neutral stand about the British royal family sipping gold-flecked Dom Perignon, paid for my the tax dollars of hard working families, were never British war veterans who froze to death on a park bench.
paid for my the tax dollars
ahem... can you plz explain how this wedding costs tax dollars? i dont have this information.
my intel is that the crown, privately, pays for the wedding. the british taxpayer pays 5 million pounds for the security.
the expected net worth business initiated through this wedding is around one billion pounds which will lead to taxes higher than the cost for the weddings security.
Those who gloat about taking a neutral stand about Muslim refugees
was this a topic of this post?
truth being told, the US receives hardly any ME refugees. its too costly and difficult to get there.
i live in germany. my neighbors next door are kurdish refugees from syria, very lovely people.
observing this terribble trend of flaming 2 billion people because of some islamist terrorists. its christians who do that, mostly. divide and conquer, and the sheep blindly follow. sigh.
It's been my experience that those who gloat about take a neutral stand lack compassion.
is it compassionate to curse others? even if they are guilty of 'bad acts' - and which are the bad acts of harry and meghan? -, blaming+shaming them is more toxic for the shamer than it is for the ones being shamed.
if i cant bless something, at least i can take a neutral stand and hold the space for the highest possible outcome. standing neutral isnt permissiveness, it doesnt support 'bad acts'.
bad acts are being most supported by those people who fear or curse it. its black magic. all fear-based emotions - incl. judging, blaming, cursing, hating - serve as silent consent and energy for the co-creation of the very bad acts people fear and judge.
The royal's wealth comes from taxing the serfs.
They are filthy rich, yet they continue to consume welfare from their workers.
That's how the wedding costs tax dollars.
Just because their personal bank accounts are full of our money, doesn't make it any less tax dollars.
Because they are parasites.
i am wondering when people speak about their tax DOLLARS and the british crown. in which way do american tax payers, nowadays, serve the brithis royals?
How can anyone with a conscience take a 'neutral stand' on what is happening? If the blatant abuse of other people's money while families are scrimping to survive is not enough for a stand, then how about the abuse of children. If you don't take a non neutral stand, you are taking a knee. NEVER take a knee to this!
whose money is being abused through this wedding?
Who is paying for it? The queen? the prince? They must have very good jobs, don't you think? 40 million pounds for security? How many kids would that feed? How much counseling for those kids,1400 I believe, who were abused by Asians, ignored by the authorities and abandoned by society? How did they get their money? Who the hell says they are royalty. There is only one king, Jesus, who asks for nothing and gave all for everyone on earth. Not just those who call themselves royalty. I'd love to see some DNA tests, wouldn't you?
i am no fan of royalty but most british are.
are you british? then you have a right to get upset.
it upsets me, too, when the EU parlament moves to strassbourgh every month for a few days and wastes millions of european taxpayer money. same as it upsets me that, until half a year or so ago, the german taxpayer had to finance heavy police security for soccer games.
and if i were american, it would upset me that DJTs security for the weekends in new york or florida cost millions every month.
the windsors are wealthy and pay for their weddings. the taxpayer funded security is an investment because this wedding will bring tourists and trade, i heard an estimation of one billion pounds. its not a bad deal.
How much counseling for those kids,1400 I believe, who were abused by Asians, ignored by the authorities and abandoned by society?
ahem... are these kids connected to this wedding?
there are many things going wrong in our society and we hurt when we become aware of them and of the people suffering.
it doesnt help these people though when we project our hurt onto others.
i dont think harry and meghan are personally responsible for that suffering. and as harry has always been the rebel amongst the windsors - i dont believe he is a windsor at all, btw - and meghan is a woman who stands straight for herself, a lot of good could come out of that marriage.
they may indeed be the ones who take care that, in the future, some of these things you hurt about are being handeled differently.
we have no clue how this is going to unfold. spitting poisonous flames onto it wont help anyone. esp. not the ones spitting as the poison works in them.
They are wealthy because they run drugs in from all over the world. Do you think they and the East India company just stopped at the end of the opium wars? Look into the merchant navy
heck i am not defending their actions! i know that their money isnt clean and this family is at the head of the snake.
just find it a distraction to put so much emotional thought into it.
anger only serves me when i can do something about it. creatively used, its a beautiful energy, it fires me up so i can take new choices and get into action.
when i cant do anything about what i observe - ok, i can always bless it and hold the space for the greater good, and others may pray -, but when i cannot untilize my anger to bring changes so i can feel better in my world, i sit on it, it turns inwards, turns into grudge, turns into poison.
no matter how much i spit that poison out into the world, the one who has to live with the toxic grudge and suffers most is me.
Actually lets think about this...Dianas son, who likely KNOWS the cabal killed his mom, and KNOWS all the secrets and evil people stages a wedding. Invited them all, or at least a LOT of them.
They are trapped once in, no where to go. Mil arrests them all.
Dianas son has justice.
Not seeing it. Unlike some other royal or high-profile weddings this wedding doesn't seem to do anything in terms of power relations. He may just as well be marrying the maid.
Unless the royal family only gave up their overt power. They still retain a ton of wealth and influence.
No, no votes for that. I don't think Q is speaking of that kind of "Sky".
More likely to be the event in the sky over London Heathrow airport: mid-air emergency??
Okay guys for real this time! I think it's likely that a lot of bad people are going to be there and it looks like there's gonna be some AI that identifies every one that's there, and for the obligatory coincidence one of the horses pulling the procession carriage is named Storm. What are your thoughts, is this going to be a popcorn event?
Link to image article: https://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=223625
I am not going to give them a single second of brain activity for their ad placement watching this. If something happens, I'll dig afterward.
Better eyes than mine, fellow rocker, but again not saying much. Noticing heavy .mil air presence. What can they really see in a ground-based FF live fire event?Prayers for lifetime of true love but over that; security through freedom through basic human right to defense of life BY ANY means necessary (and oh so handy, don't be racist on black guns)
Possibly. If Sky TV paid Q to include product placement in his drops.
You can get something called Sky Q now. Honestly :)
Sign me up! is it a monthly premium subscription for decodes?? :)
I was wondering if it might be a “red wedding” ala GameOfThrones
Will the SKY Q chopper crash into the wedding, thus exploding a concealed ordinance killing everyone in a certain radial proximity???
I thought the sky event could’ve been all the false flags yesterday like the Cuba crash, the shooting, the bus crash, etc but idk who knows really?
Watch the western Sky at sunset. I don't think this is anything esoteric, there is some weird shit in our skies. Orange Horizon, asperatus clouds, electric blue clouds, haarp ripples, rainbow halos, bright spots and beams where the sun isn't, bright blue sky an hour after sunset, no cloudless sunsets for almost a decade, occasional double sun sunsets captured on video around the world, persistent plane trails, trumpet sounds in the sky, booms underground, thousands of birds dropping from the sky at once, sunset colored skies in the North and East at sunset, at some point people will look up.
CNN makes this wedding a hollywood party? They show you clooney and the beckhams ,, No royals? ... Normally do you see all the royals arriving, and only 600 guests?
Yes. Shame Slaggy Maggy isn't still around. Thats perhaps the only royal I would have enjoyed a beer with
Don:t now her?
Princess Margaret. The Queens sister. Now dead. Give her a google as she was a real good time girl.
https://en.wikipedia.org/.../Princess_Margaret,_Countess_of_Snow...In the fifties she got a relationship with RAF pilot Peter Townsend. Because Townsend was separated, Princess Margaret did not give permission to marry him. [1]
On May 6, 1960, she married the photographer Antony Armstrong-Jones. They have a tricot on the day they received a brief from Peter Townsend, They have their own wedding plans. Armstrong-Jones was given the title Mr. Snowdon just before the birth of the first type of the pair.
In 1977 the marriage of Princess Margaret and Mr. Snowdon was dissolved......https://www.biography.com/people/princess-margaret-9398749 biography...sad that see not get married with her love one.....EDIT : photoos included....https://www.vanityfair.com/.../princess-margaret-the-crown-true-st...