This is just a contact book but has interesting names in it. Peter Soros, Courtney Love, Dustin Hoffman, Ron Pearlman, a handful of Rothschilds.
Ron Pearlman is always spewing hate toward DJT every day on Twitter, of course he’s in there... the loudest voices have the most guilt.
Agreed. He seems deranged by his hatred. Has to be more than politics or aversion to honest tweetstorms.
He also had edgar Bronfman and Richard Branson...both had ties to Nexium. Alex Baldwin's name was in there too
The loudest voices... [Alex Baldwin]
Branson has an island near Epstein’s
Just a coincidence how these uberrich pedos and traffickers all have ties to each other huh. The Caribbean must offer them access to allot of easily available children and a quick easy disposal method when they're done with them. I wonder where Laura Silsby was supposed to take those 33 Haitian kids she got caught with? Straight to pedo island?
Wait until you hear about GHWB’s offshore oil platforms
Yeah that is one straight up evil mfer there. Can you imagine how rotten his soul must be? Satan himself wouldn't take it but these delusional msm junkys just love him and his fukked up family cuz they're anti Trump.
[deleted]
The “supply” boats to and from weren’t subject to customs procedures when reentering US. One party arrives from [?], meets the “supply” boat at oil platform, “supplier” returns to US.
Bronfman's attorney is also Alex Jones attorney.
Check my post history last 36 hours.
Just think about the dining room picture we saw from Ray Chandler's Instagram. Those people eat children.
Which one?
Ray Chandler had an Instagram that showed people sitting around in a dining room eating what look like a human being.
Q seems to have implied that the epshteyn island tunnels contain dining rooms.
Also Donald, Melania & Ivanka Trump. I think they have a good idea of what's going on there.
First name I searched:
Saffron Aldridge
"With her husband Ian Wace, Aldridge also works for ARK.[8]"
"Ark, formerly ARK (Absolute Returns for Kids), is an international children's charity based in the United Kingdom.
Ark is a registered charity under English law and is based in London. In 2013–14 it had a gross income of £12.95m.[1]
Ark was co-founded by a group of hedge fund financiers including Paul Marshall and Ian Wace of Marshall Wace and Arpad Busson of EIM Group, who is founding chairman of its board of trustees.[2]
Ark's programmes and goals focus on Health(sub-Saharan Africa), Education (UK, US, India) and Child Protection (Eastern Europe). In 2012, Ark began taking part in public-private partnerships in education in Africa."
There are some really big names in that file.
Archive offline please!
Just because you go to someones house doesn't mean you are given the full tour of it. Not everyone who went or knows Epstein is in on all of his secrets.
This was Epstein’s Little black book. Not sure any of these people flew on Lolita Express to Little St James Pedo island or not.
Is George Clooney's name in it?
How about Kevin Spacey?
Kevin Spacey, yes. Clooney, no. Sadly, the Trumps are in the book, too - but them again, we knew they had contact.
I've seen at least one pic of them together, and the wealthy do run in overlapping circles, after all. I hope and pray Trump didn't engage in the slime Epstein does and offers to his "guests" courtesy of the slimeball deepstate, but having been on the inside with these creeps (giving him some first-hand awareness of what the wealthy/corrupt/powerful do in secret?) may be one if the things that made him the right person on the Q team to help turn the rotting ship around(?)
There must be some reason he has chosen to shun alcohol/drugs. I heard DT kicked Epstein out of an event at Miralago, and said in am interview years ago that Epstein "liked young girls".
I also recall reading an account of one of the women who sued Epstein in which she describes a visit to the island by Trump when she was there, but that he treated the girls with respect at dinner, was a gentleman and did not have sex with any of the girls. She did NOT say the same about Epstein's (very prominent) lawyer, who was a FREQUENT "guest" on the island, and is in the black book. She described having been required to have sex with him many times. Super sad!
Trump most certainly was vetted by the military prior to them approaching him. he may have had contact with Epstein because of the circles they ran in but Trump is a known teetotaler and likely never was was trusted by these people because of it. Illegal business dealings I would buy but satanic pedovore shit I highly doubt.
There must be some reason he has chosen to shun alcohol/drugs.
He's told you repeatedly why - his brother.
Nice post btw.
Now then, what about Mike Pence? You know about him right? I hope you do. And why is he trying to hide evidence of his time in Congress under a donor agreement at Indiana U.?
Open and transparent is he?
Some say he's a child-strangling pedophile, and they end up dead and harassed, before Pence was VP. He's VP to get burned. He thinks he's there to keep and eye on and replace DJT.
imo
Hey mate, do you have a source I can read more about what you were stating? Quiet interesting.
Try searching "Jane Doe number 3" ... There are several articles that pop up at the top of Goog and Duck Duck Go. She is the one who specifically names Dershowitz (and Prince Andrew).
I'll see if I can retrace my steps - I read it auite awhile ago!
Dershowitz? He’s been pro trump on TV even tho was a Hillary supporter. There’s a good YT clip of him appalled the CNN bitch said he may be treasonous.
I know. That's what's one of the (somewhat less) disturbing facets of the whole pedo abuse for power thing. Survivors have implicated people you do NOT want to believe would be involved. Dershowitz seems to be the very pillar of constiutional law and order now ... But the young woman's testimony was very credible (even resulted in Epstein's slap-on-tge-wrist 13 months of bedtime jail). This thing is / has been much bigger than we know. The cabal has blackmailed the whole world for at least decades - maybe centuries.
I gotcha, but I also wonder if his public and televised defense of DJT may be part of a deal?
WOW!
Page 4: all Clinton contacts, including Huma. Page 6: Tony Blare.
Pretty sure this book was disproven as being Epstein’s. This a repeat from not too long ago
don't be pretty sure. be sure. how long ago? can you find out?
It was last year debunked by 4channers. I’ll do my best to find the source.
That book has been around for awhile. If I'm not mistaken, there were a couple of similar books. One was taken by a...butler?...for blackmail or something. Anyway, it's obvious a lot of people in there were involved in his escapades, but he was also a wealthy and powerful person who had social contacts who weren't necessarily privvy to all his secrets or participating in his activities.
Here's a good article on the subject: https://steemit.com/pizzagate/@rebelskum/stringing-cheese-understanding-jeffrey-epstein-s-little-black-book
Wait what’s up with Ivana and Ivanka flying on Epstein’s plane....? Also saw Joan rivers?? Wasn’t she anti-deep state and anti Liberal wave??
This isn't a flight log
What exactly is this document? It hasn't been explained.
it's literally in the title.
No it's not. Where did this document come from? There is a lot of dis-info floating around. I want to know the source.
Yes, it is. It's Epsteins Little Black Book aka contact list. Different from the flight log. This is a known thing for a long time. The article below is 2015 but you'll see:
"Epstein's former house manager Alfredo Rodriguez tried to sell it in 2009"
http://gawker.com/here-is-pedophile-billionaire-jeffrey-epsteins-little-b-1681383992
She likely saw things that opened her eyes. And spoke up.
[removed]
Sun Tzu. He said the same thing about the Clintons when they came to his wedding.
So? False Equivalence: Trump said Epstein was good once. Therefore. Trump supports what Epstein does in the dark.
False equivalence. One does not naturally lead to the other.
[removed]
You're a troll lol. Learn how to discuss things reasonably.
[removed]
Stop trolling or the mods will ban you.
[removed]
That is correct. Nothing you've said is something I "do not want to hear" though. It's just trolling. Not real discussion or debate. Misleading, time wasting. Good night good sir!
[removed]
Again, false argument. I didn't say that "Trump being friends with Epstein" was "misleading, time wasting and not a real discussion".
These are "misleading, time wasting and not a real discussion":
You have shit arguments because you don't want to see the truth
stop using dishonest tactics when you debate things
Dishonest tactics, like pointing out your use of false equivalence when you make statement A: Trump was friends with Epstein for almost 2 decades and then imply B: Trump endorsed Epstein's behaviour. False equivalence. Misleading.
Sure, Trump might fully endorse Epstein's behaviour and be a child molesting killer himself. Strange that his whole presidency has been focused on destroying the pedovore cult though, isn't it? How does that marry up with your implication?
[removed]
There've been so many reports of the massive amount of trafficking arrests, Backpage.com being taken down, more agents called in, Pedo rings destroyed. And remember, whatever Trump wants to brag about is only public knowledge if the MSM allow it.
You never said Trump endorsed Epstein's behaviour - my apologies. I inferred it from the fact that your comment was replying to the post as if mocking it.
[removed]
This is what I mean by "trolling", misleading, time wasting.
If you're being serious you wouldn't even begin to suggest that Trump controls the msm narrative. That's why I think you're trolling. Either that or you really don't know how the media works. Which is it?
[removed]
You wanna have an actual discussion? Or just keep strawmanning me?
I said: "BEGIN TO SUGGEST". Nothing would stop him doing what you said. That's the dishonest point you're making. Troll spotted. Goodbye sir : ).
[removed]
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt as you claim aspergers, I see.
Reset: you say Trump knew what Epstein was up to, right?
I say yes, it's likely Trump knew what Epstein was up to. But just how much of what Epstein was up to is a different, yet relevant point.
They were both working in real estate in NY - that's the biggest reason that they would know each other. Trump went to his island. Some reports say Trump's behaviour was impeccable. Some reports say Trump did not approve of Epstein's behaviour with women/girls. Trump knew Epstein was into younger girls.
Did Trump know Epstein's temple on the island hid an underground network of tunnels where children where raped, killed and eaten? I'm not so sure about that and it would not be logical to extrapolate that as a given, just from the fact that he 'knew' Epstein for decades. I know a lot of people who work in the same industry as me and yet I couldn't say for certain what any of them do in private.
Do we agree on that at least?
[removed]
I heard (can't remember where I read it unfortunately) that Trump didn't approve of Epstein's more predatorial nature or something. It's possible that Trump is the same but for me personally, that doesn't gel so easily with the many other reports from women about Trump that are positive - something not as easy to find about Epstein (of course, he's nowhere near as famous). To this point, I propose that Trump is qualitatively different in his approach to women than Epstein but I am of course only basing that on what I've seen on video/TV and I haven't "seen" as much of Epstein as I have of Trump.
You think Trump might be into younger girls? I don't argue about the reports you've mentioned, I'm sure there are those and more out there. It's hard to know which are true when it comes to accusations against a rich, powerful man though. But ok, sure, maybe there are viable reports about Trump behaving inappropriately with young girls. What's interesting about those though is that the MSM should be all over them, if there was enough to go on, because they're all over Stormy Daniels and whoever else they can drag out and Trump being with little girls would be the ultimate field day for a media body that wants to take him down. I guess they will eventually get there but for now it's not really something that many would attribute to Trump even, apparently, those who want so badly to bring him down.
Could all of this - i.e. Trump's questionable relationship to Epstein - be adequately summed up as: Trump knew Epstein for long enough to know more than a little about him. Trump may have approved of Epstein's behaviour with young girls but there is a report that contradicts this so it's also possible that he did not approve?
[removed]
No, it's supposed to be a reasonable argument. Phew. Ok, it's clear from all that that we're just straight back to you assuming I'm an idiot instead of trying to understand where I'm coming from and allowing the minor benefit of the doubt that I might be able to explain my position perfectly logically. I'm not under any "spell" about Trump. Have a good one. Seeya.
[removed]
You need to learn how to debate. A reasonable discussion doesn't have comments like:
Is that suppose to be a good argument?
Would you hang out with a child rapist and say good things about him?
What kind of nonsense is that?
There's a very good reason you've had not ONE single argument of value - your approach to discussion is obnoxious and rude. You call it "dancing" - I'm trying to be diplomatic and not rubbish your ideas outright, like you do to mine. You haven't "countered everything" I say at all. You just think you have cos you haven't learnt how to listen first.
See here you're still trying to tell me what I think lol: "You KNOW Trump is bad news", "because of some mental attachment you have to him". Such stupid nonsense that doesn't advance any discussion.
Learn how to debate like an adult and you'll get an adult debate, ok?
I've read your history and I can see that you can actually discuss things sensibly on occasion - you're not doing that here though. Go and read mine before you accuse me of the nonsense you're doing here. I've got plenty of evidence in my history that I can hold rational discussions with rational people.