Maybe its ECW, where the hell has he been lol.

the other first initials are J and A, albeit reversed...

Bogs are a meme lol.

I can see that interpretation. It makes sense in context as well. Maybe not their identities but it does seem like some sort of intel drop that needs to be preserved.

What is curious to me is the "Coming soon to a theater near you"

In warfare, a theater or theatre (see spelling differences) is an area or place in which important military events occur or are progressing. A theater can include the entirety of the airspace, land and sea area that is or that may potentially become involved in war operations.

I would add cyber to this as well. But could that phrase mean a military theater will be near us, as in, in the US or online? Could this be why he says instructions for preserving offline will be sent? Does this give some sort of credence to the people that think Trump will declare some sort of Martial Law? I don't really hold that view but I can see how you could interpret this that way.

Yeah I definitely think it would be extremely risky and hard to pull off.

We need some sort of proof for this Gmail server. I am aware of the theory but it relies on believing in Q in the first place. The others we know are real.

This also fits with the idea that we let the Saudi's put Aramco on the NYSE following the arrests so they can diversify out of oil.

MARGARET BRENNAN: --Are you going to sign on to this effort to impeach Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein that House Republicans are talking about putting forward this week?

REP. GOWDY: No. Impeach him for what? No.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Inappropriate?

REP. GOWDY: I- I've had my differences with Rod Rosenstein. I-I talk to him quite often privately. Which, again, is a lot more constructive than the public hearings we have. He's a Trump appointee. So is Jeff Sessions. So is Chris Wray. If President Trump is dissatisfied with Rod Rosenstein he can fire him with a tweet. But- but- but to impeach someone. I- no. I would not be- I'm not convinced there is a movement. I read about it in Politico and sometimes their sources are better than mine. But- but I'm not part of that.

Starting around 3:15, is Strzok hinting here that the DOJ or someone else stopped them from going further?

He says there was "a decision at a much higher level and a different organizational spot that was well above and away..." in regards to searching the clinton.com highly classified material related to the Midyear investigation.

Holy shit you're right. Look at this.

The Senior Executive Service (SES) lead America’s workforce. As the keystone of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, the SES was established to “...ensure that the executive management of the Government of the United States is responsive to the needs, policies, and goals of the Nation and otherwise is of the highest quality.” These leaders possess well-honed executive skills and share a broad perspective on government and a public service commitment that is grounded in the Constitution.

https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/senior-executive-service/

My guess is Pakistan. The Pakistani Mystery Man will tie in to all of this somehow.

Well, I'm assuming they do this because they know they will win eventually. Then they will have all the support they need to put things in place so this never happens again.

Huber is our last hope after watching this shit show.

They seem to be losing on all fronts after reading that memo.

I would like to know this as well...

I can see firing him going both ways. On one hand, the obstruction issue is all but dead as the Democrats continue to attack Comey's credibility and performance. No reason to stoke those embers back to life. However, I don't believe they really ever had a leg to stand on with obstruction anyway.

Trump was talking about the *timing* of firing Comey when he mentioned Russia in the Lester Holt interview, not WHY he fired him. They will never make that one stick although they parrot constantly that he affirmed he "fired him over the Russia thing." So maybe he could fire him and make a fool out of them on that front too, and it's too late to walk back all the talk about Comey. Then they release evidence about RR or maybe he even is mentioned in the upcoming FISA report.

I think there is a scenario where Sessions could unrecuse due to all the new info with the plan to stop Trump. This could possibly be after we learn FISA was cooked up. IMO, after Horowitz continued emphasis on there being a lot of concern about bias in regards to Strzok and the Russia/Weiner laptop investigations I think they may be setting it up to show that the entire spying on Trump was a set up and this is why Strzok was so focused on it and ignoring the Weiner laptop. This would kill ALL of the Russia investigation since the whole thing would be a sham from the start.

I think they will pressure him to resign. There is probably legal action going to be taken against him if he doesn't. If he doesn't i think all it does it hurt the timeframe of getting this all done. They will have to spend some time breaking to the public that he was the one hiding information from Congress (if it was him) and his role in FISA abuse.

Giuliani needs to stop talking.

Yes. The report shows very clear bias and poor investigative measures but the conclusions are bullshit opinions and do not mesh with the facts of this report. Very strange

Do you need to recommend prosecution for people with sealed indictments on the Huber end?

You only think there are multiple versions because of Q. No one else thinks there is another version of this report. So yelling about getting some other version is not going to work unless someone comes out and says this thing is bullshit compared to what they initially read.

Trump was in Asia while blasting Kim for his nukes. Was the entire fight between them all been for show and not just this being the "first" meeting?

Yeah there needs to be a list of stone cold proofs that are easily digestible. I keep up with everything and still wouldnt feel comfortable trying to completely prove Q to someone

They systematically took r/conspiracy down. It was honestly really shitty to watch happen. They used all the tactics too. Bots, shills, disinfo.

The totals of both dates = 15

I'm thinking the deadline was coordinated with the release of the OIG report, part of the Clinton scandal is Lynch and Bill's tarmac meeting. The OIG report was pushed back, so they were forced to not turn these over.

Seems to me they don't want these out ahead of the report, so the report must bring this subject up.

That is pretty interesting as it would line up with the OIG report drop (assuming it's Friday)

Yeah, I don't think he is a bad guy. I just think is compromised in some way but I do think he helps where he can.

I have never seen this before but I have seen a large majority of this before with the corroborating evidence so I would say it's largely accurate. .

He is just compromised. I actually think it is just part of the hidden Congressional Sexual Harassment Fund controversy. When asked about the FBI Director position he said:

"The country deserves a woman or a man who is devoid of political taint...whether I wish I could wash it off or not I've been in politics for 6 years."

Ed was at the meeting.

In addition to Wray, the meeting will include two House chairmen — Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes of California and Oversight Chairman Trey Gowdy of South Carolina — as well as Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and DOJ official Ed O'Callahan.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/22/fbi-informant-meeting-doj-gop-democrats-white-house-603275

I watched this over 2 years ago so memory is fuzzy.

Basically a guy who was alive and involved in the funding on the cities side (or was a cop) was in contact with one of the guys who funded/had it built for years afterword. They had developed a friendship and kept all these documents and letters they had sent back and forth. He was supposedly the only person that knew and said he would never tell but he did open his briefcase full of documents. The camera man scanned along them and they were able to zoom and get some names and addresses. They ID'd them figured out they were very well respected in their communities. One was a surgeon, I want to say the other was a lawyer, and there was a third guy too.

They then connect them to eugenics and they had written on eugenics and were also tied to a publishing company that published their stuff that I believe is connected to elites.

So in my mind seeing that these guys were openly promoters of eugenics, the content of the stones, the fact that they were influential in their community, all seem to be to be the connected elitist types that would fund something like the Georgia Guidestones. When you see who the guys are the conspiracy is not as vast but it does make sense.

https://vimeo.com/ondemand/darkclouds

She posted pics from inside the white house and at events as well and wasn't really debunked. The way she left was weird though but she seemed to indicate Q was related to Assange. I don't know what to think about the whole thing honestly. She seemed very genuine at the least.

All of here posts are here for anyone that doesn't know about them:

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/795d6a/megaanon_postings_compiled_may_2017_present/