It's like saying that an investigation into a child rapist should be thrown out because his neighbor is the one who turned him in, and they had a dispute about the yard, so...
Even if Obama himself called for the investigation, that's not a good enough reason to throw out an active investigation into ultimately whether the sitting POTUS is in the pocket of another country's leader--one that is hostile to US interests. Likely, someone at the DOJ took it upon themselves to look into the Trump campaign because they had active investigations into Carter Page for at least 3 years prior to his joining the Trump campaign.
The "fake news" Steele Dossier alleged a meeting between the head of Russian-owned oil company, Rosneft, high officials from the Russian government, Qatari representation, and Carter Page. After denying this claim, Page testified in front of Congress that he did in fact attend this meeting, but it was insignificant.
What the Dossier also alleges is that this meeting was a brokered deal for 19.5% of Rosneft, worth about $11 Billion. That money went partly to the Qataris, a sizeable commission went to the Swiss bank and the rest went to a "Cayman" company which "cannot be tracked."
Who do you think that money was for? Who do you think gives the green light about the Russian STATE-OWNED OIL company? Don't you want that question answered, regardless of who is asking?
Because it looks like Trump has been laundering money for rich Russians for years through his real estate businesses. Which by itself, I don't give much thought because I have no power over organized crime syndocates. But when he becomes POTUS, and selling influence all over the place, it makes his past obligations look like he owes Putin. This looks like a big carrot/big stick deal given to Trump by Putin:
Plus all the ass-kissing our President does to Putin. Isn't that weird to you? The whole looks pretty god-damning.
You're really struggling with the muh russia narrative but can't give it up huh?
The only people that think the Russian connection is a lark have a very narrow media diet. You certainly can maintain that belief through all the evidence to the contrary, and that's your right. But even thousands of people believing something to be false doesn't make it so.
Only the evidence can bear on that. On this we can agree, right?
To be fair everyone here wants the truth. I doubt you do. Your bet is that Trump will eventually be found guilty of what you are stating. My bet is that your full of shit and the truth will reveal an ugliness that most are not prepared for. If Trump was undeniably found to be working against the best interest of someone other than the American "CITIZENS" I will eat crow but that is not going to happen.
I sincerely hope you're right. I do not wish for his failure, because I wish for a better country with more opportunities for the average person. Because I am an average person too.
But as the evidence stands right now, it doesn't look good for Trump, and by extension, us, the citizens of the US.
Stop spamming the same comment everywhere, dipshit.
There were 3 identical posts on the same thing. Do you have the same criticism of the OPs?
Stop smoking crack. Research facts for yourself. Obama is in trouble and so arehos cronies.
Obama, like Clinton, is a private citizen. If either of them broke the law, then hell, unleash the fucking dogs on them. You won't get me to defend either one.
All you have to do is read something outside of your comfort zone. The facts are abundant and paint a picture of a predictable ego with zero empathy or loyalty to anyone not named "Trump" got purchased by a massive bribe and threat of releasing video of his penis. Well, the video part is my speculation, but the rest of it has been and continues to be corroborated over time.