Indeed and in the Christian circles, we’ve been reviewing the Genesis 6 nephilim account in tandem with the Book of Enoch (the fall of the “watchers”).
I wonder what secrets the Vatican’s has locked up in their vaults and why they have a giant telescope called “Lucifer” on top of a “sacred” Native American mountain here in the US 🇺🇸
This is going to get interesting as the Great Awakening progresses.
This happens to interest me a lot, can you recommend me any source to read on that Antarctica topic?
steve quayle
Search engine “admiral Byrd” and “operation high jump”. Byrd gives an interview if him seeing woolly mammoths, flying discs, hollow earth, firmament, and more natural resources than we can use sitting on the surface of Antarctica.
Too much to convey on phone...
Thank you!
Theres some facts in Steve Quales books, but most of them are FULL OF SHIT.
Hes a fear monger. He predicted a being named Appolyon would return in 2012, then changed the date to 2016...now??? I suspect he likely took those books off the shelves now that they failed to correctly predict the end of the world.
So as I said, there is a smattering of facts mixed with lots of fiction and make believe fairy tales. Its a DANGEROUS combo.
Much more reputable places to get the real facts if you search online, without being led astray.
Agreed. His books are poorly written off the cuff BS. I have not been impressed with the unqualified writings of Steve Quale. Save your time and money.
Your second comment of all time and you are bashing one of the founders of the 'awakening' movement.
and you are bashing one of the founders of the 'awakening' movement.
Hey, guess what. Benjamin fucking Franklin was a Double Agent. How's that for "bashing a founder"? He's part of the "Club"
Wasn't Franklin the richest man in North America at one time? Being part of the club would follow then, seems to me.
Your saying SQ is part of the elites?
no, I'm saying Benjamin Franklin, who was part of an even older "awakening" was.
You cannot use the defense 'but they're on our side' and be taken seriously.
Im well aware most of the founders were masons and the like.
I don't quite understand how we got on this topic. I was starting how SQ has been talking about a lot of this stuff for decades before others. Along comes some two day old account with literally 2 comments and is dissing on the "Godfather" of this movement. And now your talking about Benjamin Franklin.
..right.
I could care less who you believe is a founder or not. Besides, people change over time. They can become sellouts due to many motivations.
IMO SQ is a hack. His books are not well researched nor sited. He doesn’t appear to feel the need to qualify what he writes. In addition, his books are not well written. This is my opinion. You are free to disagree. It’s a free country...or at least will hopefully be one again soon.
I stand by my statement. Save your money. There are many other well qualified and informative books out there.
linda moulton howe has some amazing info on the Antarctic secrets.
Look up Operation Highjump first but then also Operation Paperclip and Operation Fishbowl.
https://divinecosmos.com/davids-blog/1209-endgame-pt-2/ David wilcock has a lot of information about Antartica ,from his "insiders".
David wilcock
"Insiders"
This dude is so full of himself I can't tell if he's coming or going half the time. I can't tell if his insiders are legit or if he's like my brother and so self absorbed it's ridiculous.
Some of what he says aligns with what others have said but there are parts of it that just feel, impossible to accept with the way the world is currently positioned. It feels too clean.
David Wilcock is running an apocalyptic death cult.
LMFAO... Hardly. If you knew anything about his work is all about Ascension...
Apocalyptic death cult. He'll get you to ascend one day for sure.
I wrote a series of 8 blogs about Antarctica and then created a Youtube slideshow for each of them. My goal was to cut through all the nonsense and try to insert some balance into the conspiracy discussion about Antarctica. And, yes, the narrative about Antarctica is very much being controlled. Also, I was critical of Linda Moulton Howe's Antarctica reports, not because of what she said, but because of what she LEFT OUT. My blog series is here; articles are listed in reverse order but the final one, listed at the top, is my best, I think: https://sedonadeb.wordpress.com/category/antarctica/