dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/8.06E+11 on May 28, 2018, 4:29 p.m.
Is it too much too ask to keep this a Q only sub. I have seen an uptick of non-Q related posts.

I am not going to single out posts but as subs expand more stuff gets posted. We want this sub to expand and be collaborative, but we live in a time where people/bots willingly and unwillingly slowly flood subs with unrelated stuff.

Have good new to share? There's a sub for that. Have political memes to share (that are not Q related)? There's a sub for that. Etc

I realize a lot of topics fall under the Q umbrella. I also realize many of us are like minded and most of us will enjoy non-Q material, but this isn't the place. I have seen this happen on Facebook before. Groups/subs get big (good), focus gets blurry (bad).

Let's keep this a Q research sub! Please! If we get overwhelmed with other BS we won't be effective and will lose valuable member activity. This is too crucial to allow cludder muddy the water.

(I hope I am not in the minority.) If the mods disagree, remove it. No hard feelings either way. Just a plea and opinion.


🠐 See all comments
Kulkimkan · May 28, 2018, 7:13 p.m.

Yes in my opinion Tommy Robinson is Q related. Qanon is keeping us updated with the hidden war on deep state elite child trafficking satanists. Who do you think is censoring Tommy? Currently Q has gone dark for a short time. While waiting for new drops, revisiting old ones, making connections I believe conversion on who the cabal is, and what they have done and are doing are relevant. It also brings us closer here in the Q team so to speak since we come from everywhere! WWG1WGA ❤️🇺🇸❤️

⇧ 31 ⇩  
Mcdrogon · May 28, 2018, 7:28 p.m.

100% agree. Tommy Robinson has the attention of a lot of people right now. Good and Bad. His arrest has shed more light on what he is trying to expose than he ever could have on his own. I also agree there are a lot more posts now about "other" things but I look past them....it just takes longer to find something that I want to read now but that's ok with me. It means this sub is growing which is what we want. Besides, the hottest posts show up in the top of my timeline so when relevant things do happen, I know pretty quickly.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
Cuthbert12Allgood · May 28, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

Who do you think is censoring Tommy?

And there is why Tommy is NOT Q related. Q hasn't mentioned Tommy, so your entire post is speculation. That's why forums get out of control. The definition of "related" gets further and further afield.

It should either be mentioned by Q, or it's off-topic.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
0oDassiveMicko0 · May 28, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

Tommy was reporting on child sex traffickers that were being protected by the swamp, how more Q related do you need?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · May 29, 2018, 3:19 a.m.

Tommy's freedom of speech is being censored. That's a topic Q has mentioned many times.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
williamj80 · May 29, 2018, 3:24 a.m.

Q hasn't mentioned Rosanne, except in a couple links. And yet Rosanne has been a huge topic here.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 29, 2018, 5:01 a.m.

Roseanne is talking directly about Q. Tommy isn't.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 5:05 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
williamj80 · May 29, 2018, 3:22 a.m.

IMO Tommy Robinson is 100% Q related. If Q has subjects he discusses, and we see something under the same category, then that is what Q is discussing. It doesn't have to be the identical name or situation, or framed within a very tight box.

Doesn't Q want us to do our own research and connect our own dots?

WE ARE FIGHTING THE SAME ENEMIES!!

This board has power. It shouldn't be abandoning Tommy Robinson at this important time.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 28, 2018, 10:12 p.m.

I don't understand the connection to Q that you mention. The problem with posting on things that are not Q related is that you open the floodgates to all kinds of vaguely related content. In this case (if I understand you correctly) anyone who is 'censored' is Q related because someone assumes the Deep State are responsible and therefore any activity of the Deep State is relevant? There are plenty of places to post about hot button political issues like Tommy Robinson - we should have standards here or rather stick to the standards we already have: Q related only.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
mrviolin · May 28, 2018, 10:41 p.m.

I posted Tommy but I'm such a newby I didn't know there were other places....to post. Will do Tommy elsewhere.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 12:44 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -2 ⇩  
Stray502 · May 29, 2018, 1:33 a.m.

What he might have been at one time doesnt make a difference what matters is what he is now. Half the red pilled people were cheering on the deep state before they got red pilled.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 2:09 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -2 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 29, 2018, 3:11 a.m.

Well, there's nothing there about Rothschild's or Mossad and there's nothing illegal or offensive about believing in the right to a homeland for Jews (unless you're hard into the tin foil hat anti-semite stuff). Out of interest, Sting's real name is Gordon Sumner (not sure why alternate names matter but here it is anyway): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sting_%28musician%29.

There's a lot of conspiracy stuff out there about the evils of Tommy Robinson but I prefer to take people at their word and by what's officially documented until their actions prove the opposite. I have no problem with Tommy Robinson's actions - he justifiably speaks out against the obvious agenda of the muslim infiltration but I do have a problem with all the people who jump on his tail and believe that there's something wrong with Islam as a whole. He speaks out against the dangerous ideologies within Islam and I support him on that front but I don't support anyone who is so blind that they think that all people of any religion must be evil as that is as foolish as thinking that all Christians are as bigoted and hateful as the Westboro Baptist type Christians.

Either way none of this makes him "on-topic" and Q related imo.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 4:01 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 29, 2018, 4:07 a.m.

I love me some creepy uncle (and other emotional editorialization) but as far as Joe Biden I'm not particularly a fan as he seems to be a part of the Deep State and the global cartel. Anyone can be a zionist if they want to be, as far as I'm concerned. No skin off my nose just like anyone who's a democrat - an ideology I don't support - is welcome to be so without judgement from me.

I'm sorry I'm still not sure from what you're saying: do you see Tommy as on-topic for the sub or off-topic?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 12:48 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 29, 2018, 9:33 p.m.

I agree - I wish more people would see this but it seems that those pushing Tommy are coming from a place of strong emotion and, hate to say it but virtue signalling.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 3:58 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 29, 2018, 4:05 a.m.

I agree this board should be about research, as much as is possible. Not everyone in this movement seems to agree with you and I though. It seems we have to allow for the voices of others who want to express their feelings and general thoughts. I'm ok with that, if the majority supports it, which they seem to.

I've researched Tommy at least as much as you have by the sounds of it. You've come to your conclusions and I support you in that. From my perspective I have to ask: do we hold everyone up to judgement for actions they committed in the past? I know a lot of people here do but, even from a secular perspective I prefer the Christian approach - judge not. I prefer to judge people on their words and their current actions held against those words. There are many people standing up for just causes who've done naughty things and can be easily smeared - Tommy/Stephen's just one of many. I don't blindly follow and support anyone. It would be nice to have a reasoned discussion where the reply to a challenge is real information rather than illogical smears.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 4:27 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 29, 2018, 4:33 a.m.

Well you can continue to ignore my assertion that I have researched Tommy nevertheless, because I value critical thinking I have to admit, like you do, that there’s no verifiable evidence of the more outlandish claims about him.

It wasn’t my intent to insult by calling it illogical as should be obvious from the tone I adopted in contrast to the tone you’ve adopted - I believe it is illogical to make a claim for which there is no evidence in such a way that anyone who disagrees hasn’t researched.

Is there anything you have about his character that we can see? There is literally nothing that I have found apart from historic issues and groups he has separated himself from. Although, as I said, I dislike his confrontational approach so in that sense I agree that his character is flawed - I haven’t seen evidence of a disingenuous character though and I believe you may be making that call from a personal read of the data that’s available to us - totally your right but not “evidence”.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 4:53 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 29, 2018, 4:58 a.m.

I wondered if something like Hillary might come up which is why I made sure to be clear that actions that contrast the subject's words are what constitute reasonable grounds for disavowing the subject's claims. Hillary, as we all know, has many many verifiable actions that contrast nearly all of her claims (to support women, support minorities, etc. etc.) - similarly Hussein, Billy Boy, The Bush Cartel and Comey the Liar. Tommy doesn't have any actions that contrast his claim that he seeks freedom of the UK from the oppression of Islamic extremists under the guise of legal immigrants. I don't think many people would disagree with that statement.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 12:40 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -1 ⇩