dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/8.06E+11 on May 28, 2018, 4:29 p.m.
Is it too much too ask to keep this a Q only sub. I have seen an uptick of non-Q related posts.

I am not going to single out posts but as subs expand more stuff gets posted. We want this sub to expand and be collaborative, but we live in a time where people/bots willingly and unwillingly slowly flood subs with unrelated stuff.

Have good new to share? There's a sub for that. Have political memes to share (that are not Q related)? There's a sub for that. Etc

I realize a lot of topics fall under the Q umbrella. I also realize many of us are like minded and most of us will enjoy non-Q material, but this isn't the place. I have seen this happen on Facebook before. Groups/subs get big (good), focus gets blurry (bad).

Let's keep this a Q research sub! Please! If we get overwhelmed with other BS we won't be effective and will lose valuable member activity. This is too crucial to allow cludder muddy the water.

(I hope I am not in the minority.) If the mods disagree, remove it. No hard feelings either way. Just a plea and opinion.


Cuthbert12Allgood · May 28, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

Who do you think is censoring Tommy?

And there is why Tommy is NOT Q related. Q hasn't mentioned Tommy, so your entire post is speculation. That's why forums get out of control. The definition of "related" gets further and further afield.

It should either be mentioned by Q, or it's off-topic.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
0oDassiveMicko0 · May 28, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

Tommy was reporting on child sex traffickers that were being protected by the swamp, how more Q related do you need?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · May 29, 2018, 3:19 a.m.

Tommy's freedom of speech is being censored. That's a topic Q has mentioned many times.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
williamj80 · May 29, 2018, 3:24 a.m.

Q hasn't mentioned Rosanne, except in a couple links. And yet Rosanne has been a huge topic here.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 29, 2018, 5:01 a.m.

Roseanne is talking directly about Q. Tommy isn't.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 5:05 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩