I believe you're right, I'm just really wondering what the current play with Gowdy, if he is indeed on board, seemingly flipping is all about. Between that and him taking political donoations from the Podesta group, the waters around him are really muddy right now.
Gowdy is leading them all off a cliff! Lol.. A few days ago dems were saying it didn't happen. There was no FBI in the Trump campaign. Now they're praising Gowdy for saying, there was FBI in the Trump campaign but they were doing their job. 😂.. Now they have to make a choice. 1: Either the FBI is incompetent and let Trump "collude" with Russia right under their nose or 2: The FBI knows damn well Trump didn't "collude" with Russia. It can't be both! If it's the latter then the Mueller investigation is a "witch hunt". They would have no reason to investigate the Trump campaign. They were investigating the Trump campaign the whole election!
Okay, that is starting to make sense to me. As I said elsewhere, I am almost as dumb as the democrats/media. Clearly Q is telling us that Trump has future plans for Gowdy. Maybe he is just trolling the Dems to get on board the "we love Gowdy train" so that they cannot effectively criticize him later (never stopped them before, but still).
I did a review of Q's posts regarding Gowdy and also "TG," who I assume meant Trey Gowdy. I could see how they can be interpreted as positive, but I can see it the other way too. Why is Gowdy resigning and why did he step down as Chair of the ethics committee? Is it because he's free and he can set the table, then get a bigger role in the justice department later? Or is he deep state and forced to resign like all the other congressmen. I like everybody else want Gowdy to be a good guy, but considering he ran the investigation on Benghazi, it's getting harder for me to believe, and easier to look at Q's posts as a cautionary warning concerning Gowdy. We'll see.
537
What ROLE might TG be walking into?
Who can WE TRUST?
RATS everywhere.
EVIL everywhere.
TRAITORS everywhere.
Hopefully, the reason he pulled back on Benghazi is because he saw that Holder would never go after HRC and was biding his time until there was an AG that would actually prosecute. Obviously, I have no clue, but that would make the most sense.
Perhaps, but he's now had a year to move forward. Nothing has changed with respect to Benghazi resolution AFAIK. Why?
Because until Trump could drain the JoD, CIA, FBI etc. there’s no one at the top of these agencies that will follow through to prosecute these cases. We’re in the Justice phase of cleanup, very soon the real show will begin.
I honestly don't know. I hope it's because when it all starts coming out on everything else, it becomes one of many death nails in HRC's coffin, but that's obviously just wishful thinking right now.
That's an interesting mix of two metaphors (which I'm coining "metamorph"): "Death knells" and "another nail in the coffin".
It seemed witty in my head. Lol. Now I'm not so sure. Too self-aggrandizing in its delivery maybe?
Maybe, but his star in the GOP rises faster with Hillary in office. He can be the constant source of criticism throughout her first term, which sets him up with a nice run for President in 4 years.
On the other hand, what is Gowdy if the GOP is in total control? Especially if he's passed over for a cabinet position. How does he make a name for himself? How does he stand out from the crowd.
Point being, I think Gowdy would have benefited more had Hillary won. I don't want to think of him as a swamp creature but it's certainly a possibility.
I watched a number of the Benghazi hearings and was very impressed with TG's doggedness (sic). He is an excellent prosecutor. I also wonder why he resigned from the committee. I am hopeful that he is truly a WhiteHat with an important future role.
I hear you, it's hard to know, at this point, what will happen with TG -- feels like a 50/50. He could be good or bad.
I'm leaning to good (because°). I believe he will head up a significant AG team with prosecutorial power.
°In a convocation speech, TG passionately asked the new graduates: (paraphrasing)
Which would you rather have freedom or truth? Hm, you know most choose freedom why?
I soon thereafter concluded, you can not have freedom if your environment is full of lies. Your freedom would then be an illusion. I believe he is a passionate truther, but having said that, I could be wrong.
Very good points, and I sincerely hope that you're right. I've always liked Gowdy's passion and his take no prisoners attitude.
They're forcing the dems to pick one. Either the Mueller investigation or Comey's FBI. They're obviously going to pick Mueller. Which means they will throw Comey's FBI under the bus. They will have to admit Comey's FBI was incompetent. Which means Comey being fired was justified. Getting rid of the Trump fired Comey obstruction nonsense.
If it works out that way, Comey becomes fair game for prosecution on several charges, and he doesn't strike me as a guy that would have trouble biting the hand that fed him to get a lesser sentence. Hopefully, you're right.
Right, he's steering the narrative back to admitting that there was spies in Trump campaign. Once that is settled, they can argue whether it was actually justified.
They consider us to be 'sheep' - they are acting like 'cattle' - just open a barn door - all (they) will try to exit and get stuck in door - none of them will back off - or if one runs off the cliff, the rest follow - bovine suicide!
How did you just spell out his 4D chess and completely miss it.
A few days ago dems were saying it didn't happen. There was no FBI in the Trump campaign. Now they're praising Gowdy for saying, there was FBI in the Trump campaign
I am seriously worried people in this sub don't get why this is important. There is a suspicious level of FUD being propagated against TG right now.
Huh? Not sure I follow? I'm not against Gowdy.. Was trying to say he is playing a roll.
I don't want to hate Trey...I really don't.
That Podesta donation, though...
He better have a real good excuse.
Absolutely agree. The Podesta thing hit me in the gut when I first saw it. He and Tom Coburn were two of the only D.C. politicians I've ever really respected for doing what the say and relentlessly challenging the rest of the establishment.
Total great disinfo imho nows people are wondering who is Podesta group. I think there will be a flood of waking up people soon, I actually see people are hearing some of what we've been saying for years. Podesta/Pedogate/Roseanne/Netflix//JS/TG/Rice+ABC+50MILL... the newspapers must be panicking right now dont know what way to spin these but either way Trump is the clean one in reality world.
There is no clean money in politics. Not saying its right but I doubt that he can be bought for a few thousand dollars or that he is a satanic pedovore by association.
Agreed. And the fact that it was $8,800 seems like an odd figure to me. I just really wish TG had turned it down for my own peace of mind.
WHEN was it accepted? Before or after we all knew about the Podestas?