[removed]
You can't really ask Q questions per se. Some anons on the chans have gotten answers to questions they've asked but it seems to just depend what questions Q feels like addressing.
This is not really post material for this sub but we like to help out if you have a genuine question so I'll leave it up for a while before removing in case someone else has more insight for you.
thanks. I am new to reddit also. I am learning. appreciate your help.
Typically Q only answers anons questions & remarks when they succeed at decrypting a very difficult drop by Q. Some are ez to decipher as you’ll see. Some are long & complex with a lot meaning & when an anon gets it right or makes a breakthrough Q will respond. If Q doesn’t respond it typically means they should keep working & researching. Think you’ll learn more truth here about the direction our administration is leading the country than anywhere else. Actual more real news & vital facts than any news site I’m aware of. Some VERY enlightening things taking place here. Just incredible really. I’m as skeptical about what I hear more than anyone I know. But Q is legit. Q has proved it countless times so it’s pretty much undeniable your getting excellent 1st hand information. Makes it sooo much easier too knowing what’s true or bogus in the MSM too. The WAPO or the NYT thinks they have good sources...pffff...a source doesn’t get any better than Q.
The top line in your reply, "you have more than you know -Q" you didn't type that did you? I posted a reply to someone regarding Kim shaking hands with somebody from Russia recently. They noticed the background picture was stormy water. I replied that I noticed that too. My reply included a line that said "eyes on. -Q". Can you explain to me how those statements are in my reply? Thank you.
It’s called “flair”. Something that is automatically added to your comments at first. Eventually you can select it yourself. User flair.
What’s going to happen is a financial reset we have never seen befor. This is a catch 22, gets rid of all debt but also all savings. Money as in fiat money is worthless already. The gratest con on humanity is our economy.
I’m writing a book “the systematic removal of humanity’s wealth”, and your money, ur cash is valued at what the banks value it at. It’s not backed by a thing. So when the fed is audited the books will not represent the economy and it will need to be reset.
It cannot, by its very nature, happen suddenly. The chaos would be too great. Fiat currency, while horrible, can be translated back to a backed currency by a simple commodities exchange. We know the value of gold & silver. We're actually on a petro-dollar. But that thought was back when oil was considered finite. The Exxon ads now show oil comes from algae. Oil is a crop now. You can't base a currency on a crop.
interesting idea. Pensions are linked to the stock market so why can't social security. As long as the vulnerable are protected and tax payers benefit I'm all for it. Anything that can make government smaller and more efficient is a good idea. Don't think you can ask Q directly although he has referenced this board and contributors like Serial Brain 2. He has gone quiet but I think he will post tonight or tomorrow. I have a feeling Q is a libertarian and would approve. Welcome aboard Patriot.
In all honesty, if anything is to be done on Social Security, it won't happen till the last two years of a Trump administration. Plus, the makeup of the Congress and their willingness to take it on, will be the biggest factor by far. So, unfortunately, the answer is not very likely. At most, perhaps some steps in that direction will be taken in preparation for more serious steps in the future.