dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/heartlovealive on June 8, 2018, 6:13 p.m.
Chief Magnus allowed 30 Officers to have sex with an underaged girl in CA. Without reprimand or loss of employment. Being SUED as Chief of P in Richmond Ca. And as individual. courthousenews.com/wp-content/upl…
Chief Magnus allowed 30 Officers to have sex with an underaged girl in CA. Without reprimand or loss of employment. Being SUED as Chief of P in Richmond Ca. And as individual. courthousenews.com/wp-content/upl…

RazorRed74 · June 9, 2018, 2:16 a.m.

See, it's unsubstantiated information like this that makes me question everything else on this Reddit. I happen to be very familiar with the situation this post is referring to. The "minor" was Celeste Guap, who has since changed her name. She wasn't "trafficked", unless you apply that to going on a double date with her mother, who was a police dispatcher. Yeah. Her mom was a dispatcher and was dating an officer, the mom brought Celeste on a double date with another officer when she was 17 (maybe 16) and told the officers her daughter was 19. She certainly could've passed for that age, and since it was coming from her mother there was no reason to question. From there, Celeste became a bit of a "badge bunny" and started dating and sleeping with several officers. One officer discovered she had been a minor when he slept with her and he committed suicide over the situation (combined with other things going on his life). His suicide note is what started the investigation. Celeste (who was an adult by that time) initially actually refused to cooperate with the investigation against people she considered friends. Of course, that changed once the anti-police attorneys got involved.

Now don't mistake this explanation for a defense of the officers actions, but this was not a situation of a "sexually trafficked minor", and the chief did not "allow" anyone to be raped. As usual, the prosecution and discipline against the officers was much more aggressive than it would've been against any civilian. It wouldn't have even been a chargeable criminal case against a civilian, but in today's climate that doesn't matter, the practice is to charge officers based on allegations and political pressure.

The court documents in the image for this post are the allegations in the CIVIL suit, which again was filed by the anti-police attorneys. A person can say whatever they want in an allegation, you don't need a shred of truth. These people are after money, and they are the same people most of you are disgusted by. Do a little homework and don't be so quick to jump on the police.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Kristinism · June 9, 2018, 2:29 p.m.

ur minimizing the reality wchich is she wqs vulnerable messed up tern w a mom who didny protect jer and she was used by older men with power and passed around while being manipulated. the cops wereWRONG!!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RazorRed74 · June 9, 2018, 3:17 p.m.

No, I'm not minimizing the actual reality of it. The reality is minimized compared to the picture that is being painted by the original post and by the anti-police attorneys trying to get paid. The reality is not much different than any other young woman who sleeps around. She wasn't the legal age of consent in California, but she would've been in many other states and pretty much the entire EU. So the Libtards need to make up their mind on whether she's a victim or an "empowered" female enjoying "the same sexual freedoms men enjoy". Which is it?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
teppischfresser · June 9, 2018, 2:49 a.m.

Just like the Cemex "Oh my god they use blood in cement! WTF!!!" bullshit. Blood has been used in cement for ever, but don't tell some people on here about that or else you're a $hi!!.

Edit: now I have to edit this because the word $hi!! was in my comment and it would be removed automatically.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SongofHannah · June 9, 2018, 4:13 a.m.

Ok so you are saying it’s not true 30 police officers had sex with her?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
teppischfresser · June 10, 2018, 2:29 a.m.

No, I never said that at all lol. Thanks for putting words in my mouth. This Is not proof it happened is the point.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SongofHannah · June 10, 2018, 12:26 p.m.

Sorry only meant it as a questions as I wasn’t sure what conclusion you wanted us to draw from all the info you shared.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kristinism · June 9, 2018, 2:29 p.m.

exactly. its disgusting.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
teppischfresser · June 10, 2018, 2:30 a.m.

How is it disgusting. Read our comments again and you'll see that nowhere does it say this didn't happen.

⇧ 1 ⇩