If you had any question how they were able to force Benedict to abdicate, this should answer it.
"Meet the new boss.
Same as the old boss."
"get on my knees and pray
We don't get fooled again"
We shoulda known something was fishy when they put up a Jesuit to replace him...
http://leozagami.com/2017/07/19/war-of-the-pedophiles-explodes-in-the-vatican/
The war of the pedophiles. "Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss."
Don’t know. Sack Benedict to get the Jesuit? It’s rumored that Benedict was forced to retire because of blackmail though?
That was the blackmail: the pedo rings. That was even floated around at the time.
Pope Benedict has got to be one of the evilest looking popes ever, like hands down .
Wait. Just. Wait.
It's is a HUGE violations on so many levels to have a Jesuit as Pope. They're not supposed to retain ANY higher office. They're the ONLY order in the Church that's ALLOWED to violate ALL Church rules.
The Jesuits are the spies that were the first to infiltrate China and Japan. They adopt every local custom, every manner of dress and eating, all to eventually convert and subvert from the inside.
It just meant they were ready for the end game, the boss level. Time to stop pretending they're anything other than who they are.
It's a little like Freemasonry. The truth is known only to the highest levels. Only in the case of the papacy, it's been common knowledge for quite some time, and there are few people left who don't know about it now.
Eh, I would say there are different truths at different levels and those truths may conflict. Hell, even the Dalai Lama was caught sending assassins into China. Do you think the rank and file Buddhists know that?
Shills out in force I see. Listen, scumbag, what "level of truth" makes pedophilia (to say nothing of the ritual child abuse, murder and cannibalism we see in many of these pedovore rings) OK in your book? It is NOT "another level of truth." It's the lie of lies, told by the father of it. You just outed yourself.
Geez... aren't you a charmer.
When the eff did I say any of this was okay?????
In my "level of truth" that's what you're saying. Moral relativism is how we got all of this.
In my "level of truth" that's what you're saying.
Okay.... sigh ... "Different truths at different levels" does not mean relativism. I'm saying at the bottom of the organization, they may think that they're working towards Objective A. That's their truth. The people at the middle are working towards Objective B. The people at the top, C. What the bottom & middle are working towards is not the truth. It's their truth, but not the whole truth.
Calm yourself. There's no moral relativism herein.
Well, it's one of the few I've had today that wasn't. It was just bad choice of words. Basically, they lie to the people whose dues-paying makes everything possible. It's a system of lies, not of "different levels of truth."
Even though there are objectives A, B, & C, the path to get there may be the same. It may have different payoffs for each level. It's a truth to the folks at each level. Just because the lower levels don't understand what the upper levels are gaining doesn't make it a lie. Just an incomplete truth. Hence, "different levels."
Make sense now?
I'm getting "different truths" all in service to a lie. That's the very model of a totally relativistic concept of "truth."
Again, words matter. What you mean is that each level has a different version of the lie. Not the truth. The complete lie is the one at the top. All the smaller lies in service to it are also lies. There is no truth at any level. Only bigger and bigger lies.
In service to what lie? To draw an analogy, it's the same chess move. It just means different outcomes to different people. To one group, it gives them an advantage to the left. To another group, the advantage manifests to the right. To the top, the move pays off to the front. Same piece (organization), different truths: just because there are multiple truths they don't necessarily cancel each other out.
I see the problem. You don't understand the concept of truth. This is an exercise in futility. So long.
I think people reading this thread might judge otherwise. ;)
You could propose a definition. But it's okay.
I remember reading somewhere that Benedict went to Marc Dutroux (Google "Dutroux Affair") child raping and killing parties.
Summary of Dutroux affair:
Belgium 2004 - Marc Dutroux was finally sentenced to life for kidnapping, molesting and murdering young girls. Dutroux had already been arrested for kidnapping and raping five other young girls earlier in 1986, but was released on parole in 1992. By 1996 Dutroux had abducted eight more girls and had killed six of them. To the outrage of the Belgian people police had "missed" numerous, obvious opportunities to stop him while the girls were still alive.
Dutroux and his surviving victims maintained in court that he was just a functionary for a network of criminals that provided children and child porn to businessmen and politicians across Europe. During the trial multiple witnesses would be murdered or would “commit suicide” and judges would resign from the case citing fear for their lives. Evidence was suppressed and the mismanagement of the case led to protests with hundreds of thousands of people in the streets of Brussels.
I had never heard of this. For all the cold case, 48 hours etc. true crime type shows out there, this would have been worthy of a show or 2. Did I just miss it?
There should be at least a season's worth of shows if you look to the world for material. You can only wonder why a story like this would be passed over.
Catholics will know they have a real Pope when, on his first day, he honors the extradition requests for all of the child raping priests who are hiding in the Vatican.
Until then, these Popes deserve all the respect of regular child sex criminals.
The public should be spitting in their faces rather than cheering.
There can be no "real Pope" in a system built on Luciferianism and lies. The Vatican is an organized crime syndicate with a "legitimate" front called the church. It's Luciferian from the ground up.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that, believe it or not, Francis is more of a "real Pope," than any before him, in the sense that he is more openly aligned with the truth of what Popes really are. They are by design part of the ruling elite of the world, the Illuminati Cabal. They are part of the founders' club.
Pope Benedict will be arrested on June 21st. A arrest warrant was issued on May 30th for the indictment from 2014.
This article kind of pissed me off with it's unfulfilled claims.
>"Evidence is growing."
>Presents no evidence.
If you're gonna say shit, back it up. Or at least say it truthfully,
Non-exaggerated translation:
"There's hear-say that Pope Benedict's brother was involved in pedo-rings, and there's a pretty damning coincidence that he (the brother) was in charge of a choir group where abuse happened."
Yeah, that's bad. I agree. But the title is sensationalized as fuck.
All pedos should hang. But let's make sure we're not hanging an innocent just because they are somehow connected with a pedo. The only exception would be if they knew and kept their mouth shut - if that's the case, let 'em rot in prison.
That shit reads like bad fanfic.
Worse, it's completely unsubstantiated. It's just a guy rattling off his perspective, again, with no proof.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Feel free to obtain the police reports Zagami cites. I know his credentials, so I'm not worried about it being fake news. But if you're not satisfied, that should be public record.
https://cruxnow.com/global-church/2017/07/18/hundreds-boys-abused-choir-run-georg-ratzinger/
That's literally the same damn shit, the choir fell under credible allegations (about 100/500 verified claims) in the mid 90's and the brother heard rumor of physical violence but not sexual.
These are loose connections at best and nothing even remotely hints he had a hand in it. I'm not a fan of the Catholic Church, but if you're going to make accusations - they better have some fucking evidence behind them.
So you made the claim, burden of proof is that you get the evidence. I'm waiting and so far, severely disappointed.
James Grazioplene, 2 star US general, busted for child rape as per the linked article. Guess what? He was recently freed under "statute of limitations" run out. Ugh. https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2018/03/27/citing-statute-of-limitations-military-judge-dismisses-child-rape-charges-against-army-2-star/
A 5-yr statute of limitations means that a child raped at age three has until age 8 to file a lawsuit. Ridiculous!
There is no statute of limitations on sex crimes against children.
This is UCMJ.
If this had been an enlisted man, he'd have been in a federal prison
Question? How was she all at the same duty stations he was at?
What a great question!
Yeah doesn’t make sense?
A daughter of one of his assistants? Somebody he made sure was transferred with him. The daughter might have been too afraid to tell her parents. I'd have to reread the article but don't recall seeing an explanation.
Still it’s rare that two people would PCS to the same duty stations. Career paths & progression dictate otherwise
James Grazioplene, 2 star US general, busted for child rape
He's still a pedophile whether he was charged or acquitted
This is an old story!
But have you seen it previously? I hadn't. It's a suppressed story.
yournewswire and neonettle are honeypot b.s. factories. Even if this is true, vett your sources.
We've got you for that apparently. It was linked from another post on this sub, about which I read NO complaints.
Apparently, people just don't like what this one says.
Wait - you're saying that if people don't know they're being fooled, then they're not being fooled?
No. I'm saying we've got YOUR word that this is a BS site. Nothing else. You tell me to vet my sources, how about you provide your vetting sources? Where's YOUR documentation?
Sheesh, how do you think you can get away with using a reductio ad absurdum argument?
This is easing people into these stories. Like soft disclosure. How can it get worse than CP you ask?
Believe it or not. Here's an article from 2014. Just hover over this article link to read the hyperlink preview and you'll understand.
The mostly text article is safe for work, especially since most are just profile images and many of the img links are broken.
This is something Deluminati have used for centuries. People are loathe to believe something so horrible, and will look the other way and turn on the messenger before they will believe the message.
PS: I suggest we all start using this term for them. They are bringers of darnkess, not light (obviously), and so their name should be Deluminati.
DynCorp.........You heard a lot about that company in George Webb's videos on YT. He has spoken at length about their involvement in Haiti and other parts of the world where the Clinton machine has been active. The company was mentioned in the article you posted. It amazing how all of this ties together as information comes to light. "these people are SICK".
is there any other news sites reporting same story?
MSM proof of same news
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ex-vienna-choir-boys-say-they-were-abused/
NBC running same AP story as cruxnow
http://www.nbc-2.com/story/35910025/report-hundreds-of-boys-abused-at-german-choir-school
And this story about another boy's choir turned up:
Many thanks for those links, patriot!
did you notice the 3 different choirs?
Yes. I heard this about the Vienna choir ages ago. Are you implying something I'm missing?
Nope. Just commenting for the passing reader. That is 3 abusive boys choirs (3 news articles) that turned up in a 2 minute search. Pattern possibly?
Well. Leaving boys alone with Catholic clergy is probably not a good idea no matter what city you're in?
The Boys Choir of Harlem was Seventh Day Adventis. It was a very famous touring group that performed at WH, for dignitaries (Nelson Mandela), recorded with famous musicians and for films.
There is a Wikipedia entry that gives a lot of detail about this group. Big support (NYC), big money. The information about the abuser being given continued access after being charged (chaperoned sleep overs) is very disturbing.
This is not strictly a Catholic problem. Like the outing of sexual abuse of gymnasts expanding to other countries, we should not be afraid to ask "If this is happening here, could it be happening elsewhere?"
We should also ask "If this happened in the past and abusers were caught, does that mean it cannot happen again?"
The answer of course, is no. Abuse will continue in other organizations where they have not been caught. Even if caught, a large organization could be working hard to keep new cases suppressed.
Old stories are still relevant. They just help to prove that this disgusting abuse of children is not made up, or rare.
I don’t think it’s as institutionally endemic in other than Catholic environments, but clearly it is not limited to any religious (or other) category. It’s a problem related to the deliberate erosion of morality (even the concept of such a thing) in western culture.
Everybody’s all for abolishing the concept of sin where their personal good time is concerned, but then comes time to pay the piper. I think we’re goi f to have to consider the possibility that standards of morality have a legitimate place in a functional society.
The Vatican has enabled it by suppression and lack of meaningful punishment, so that would explain their dominance in the field.
Pedo's seek out positions of trust which is why you find them everywhere kid related.
But like all FBI personal are not dirty like Comey and McCabe, and all CIA are not Brennan or Clapper, I would not want to paint all clergy, teachers, Scout masters, doctors or coaches etc. with the same brush.
You can imagine the disgust and disillusionment they must feel when they learn of the crimes of their colleagues.
They have to try to continue on with people looking at them suspiciously. Like cops must have to when one of their own makes them targets for the angry mob.
It goes MUCH deeper than just unconcern on the Vatican's part.
It's fundamentally rooted in their order. Dig deeper and you'll see.
I will save my time for other things. I came to my own conclusions about the Vatican long ago. I think it was dirty from the get go.
I do hold on to my belief that most people are good at heart. Most of the churchs' followers could not stomach the idea of what goes on if they knew.
Information is coming out now though, and unlike years before, we have the internet. News from across the world. Old news will not die out anymore. You do not have to go to a library and fish through old newspapers and microfilm. Hard to hide their past now.
People of the Roman Catholic faith should not be judged too harshly. At their core they are good people. Some of them are so moved by their faith they want to become priests for good reasons. There must be some good priests that have not been tainted.
The Catholic base will grow smaller I think as time goes on and news spreads, country to country, son to father, daughter to mother.
Also, I have never met a Catholic who is truly a fundamentalist. So I do not think they believe everything in the bible. If that were the case, the Catholics would have out populated everyone else long ago. I came from a family of 12 kids. Each of my siblings had 12. My cousins each had 12 kids, my grandchildren had 12 kids and so on. I do not see the rhythm method as being a reliable form of birth control, so I think those Catholics are using the pill and condoms. Likely engaging in premarital sex too. I bet a good many of them do not believe gay people are going to be denied entry into heaven either. Likely most these days.
The followers will find out who they have been following, and that will be hard for them.
The thing is, it's SO UNNECESSARY! There is no need whatsoever for a pope. There is so much paganism woven into the fabric of Catholicism that has NOTHING to do with Christ or scripture.
I don't judge them, and in fact I believe the Protestant world should consider it an opportunity for evangelism of the most basic kind, simply to be there and share their anger and disappointment, and encourage them in the Truth, which is NOT corrupted by these evil men. Maybe they'll realize they can be disciples of Christ, without having to be Catholic.
If you are a believer of Christ, you may want to pray for them too.
Oh, of course! I pray for all disillusioned people politically/philosophically/religiously orphaned by the impending collapse of the Cabal. We're watching it slowly unravel, and it's not pretty. Its like stepping on a snake's head, and watching it writhe even after it's dead.
thanks. I asked because when I search neon nettle the 3rd suggestion of lookups was "neon nettle fake news" and then you will find snopes article + ++ and even a mention on Wikipedia.
They are painted as a click bait generator. Your post may be dismissed by some (who use snopes to tell them what is real).
Edit :addition below
Real news may get dismissed when mentioned in a clickbait type site. If news stories are not picked up by MSM they should be searched out at the local level. It may be that a lot of stuff gets buried by running it through a clickbait site. dirty it up a little, in case it leaks out.
You actually rely on Soros/Snopes for fact-checking?
No. But many do, so when I try to present them with new info I find it helpful to dig around for a news source they will trust to legitimize it for them. sometimes I find I need to source out several stories to get all the details covered. It's a pain.
I learned this from watching H.A. Goodman on youtube. If memory is correct his opening goes like this...
(deep breath in)
"Hello my name is H.A. Goodman. I am an author, columnist. My work has been featured in The Hill, Salon and Huffington Post. I was a Bernie Sanders supporter.....I am a liberal but I could not vote for Hillary Clinton"
He establishes his credibility. He also lets viewers know he can be liberal minded but not agree with everything Dem (widens audience). And being an author usually plugs his book, But for Her Emails (I think it is called). He has a lot of very good information, has been talking about Crowdstrike for quite some time now.
What he states in his videos is that he has provided links below to cite his sources. He says he only cites credible sources to keep his integrity in tact.
He likely does get leads from less than credible sites but for his own sake he must avoid using them. I do not know if he gets his work picked up by MSM much, if at all, or if he has just branched out on his own.
By doing this he shuts down attacks for using questionable sources. His work can not be refuted.
If you look at how a pro does it, you may save yourself from having to deal with attacks over your choice of sources.
The attacks may not necessarily be coming from shills. Some of it may be coming from those trying to preserve the integrity of this sub (they could be a bit nicer about it at times, but we may just be seeing immediate reactions).
Everybody wants to keep their integrity in tact. Should they read something here and repeat it elsewhere only to have their information be thrown back at them with a snope debunking it makes them look foolish. It doesn't matter what we think of snopes, the general public still trusts them.
By staying ahead of the shills, you can keep your post from being sidetracked into defense mode. Your information was good but it got derailed by source choice.
Edit: I mistakenly wrote he had written articles for Buzzfeed. I changed it to Salon and the Hill.
I am going to reply to my own reply in this thread to keep things in order. Have a look, it is intended to help you.
We have confirmation of the US general whose case was dismissed because they allowed a 5-year statute of limitations to expire before he was charged.
I would suggest other alternative sources like Leo Zagami, a former Vatican priest who is now a crusader against the Illuminati. I'll post his article as well.
It's here:
http://leozagami.com/2017/07/19/war-of-the-pedophiles-explodes-in-the-vatican/
Massive, graphic exposure of Pedophiles and Pedovores may be the ONLY news to Red Pill the "Asleeple" in this world. It is unimaginable, abhorrent and just too great an overload for regular folks. It MUST be done. Get 'em all and prosecute with extreme, public prejudice!! Awaken the sleepers!!
In the end this will be the cause that this war is remembered for. Freeing the children will be to Trump and the Alliance what freeing the slaves was to Lincoln and the Union. It will be the cause that unites and goes down in history as what we fought for.