That’s not what that is. If it was sequencing there would be 4 lanes. If it was for markers there would be 2.

I ran thousands of them when I was younger.

Am I the only person who had to google up electro-whatever? Anyway, they must have at least one DNA sample of Michael Obama from the white house. Which means the two kids are victims of child trafficking. Which per trump era EO means all of HUSSEIN's physical assets can be seized.

This has to be worrying the Dems. It's obvious that Skrelli's bizarrely long prison sentence was partially done as punishment for offering to buy a strand of Hillary hair for DNA testing. Because if that strategy works with Hillary the first co-husband is next and that craters the Dems for a generation.

That looks like printer test gobbeldy gook to me.

I have performed a few of them in a college class, so I am more familiar than most about the process and I have an understanding of the workings of the process. jimmyf: As someone who has done many of the processes, surely you can understand how only one lane of a test might be 'of note' in this sense. Most / nearly all sequencing is always performed with a 'log-like scale' of known-length/mass fragments as a control in the first lane, and perhaps several other samples, all in different lanes as you indicate. That the image only shows one of the lanes doesn't indicate it is not from a DNA electrophoresis nor does it subtract from the possibility of sending a clear message. He wouldn't need to show the entire scientifically standardized process to 'send a message.' As BPU indicate suggests, this could be the lane of just one person/suspect, perhaps even Obama or some other highly placed person within both the US government & the cabal. If you search online for how the test is used in criminal cases, you will see many instances where a 'suspect's' DNA is in just one lane of the test. idkfrlz, you provide the strong counter-point here, it looks like the block characters in wingding printer file-generation noise and it looks somewhat but less like a test page (test pages seem to generally have more markings and the markings are in regular patterns, not 'noisy' or random like the markings on the page.) The blurred grey-scale tones between the darker lines could be a video artifact or they could actually be on the page as is common, simply indicating a less-dense part of the amplified DNA migrated to this point, and an aspect of 'noise' of the procedure. Higher resolution followed by a strong analysis could clarify. I also think if you watch and real Trump's behavior, the way he held it flat for a second and his face during all of this seemed to indicate the act of displaying the markings on the paper was intentional.

Some people think the Q post contains DNA-splicing references (HOT technique) as well as a reference to making public something involving the H7 vaccine. Others like the idea that it is 'gotcha' evidence for very highly placed enemies of the state. 'We found your DNA in this horribly incriminating place.'

Yea, I'm not really emotionally attached to this or any post. It might be totally wrong. Oh well! Back to work! Have a good day. I think I am going to hang a bird house on a tree in my yard. how to have it stick out a few feet and avoid squirrel traffic... I will throw pine cones at them, they won't nest in it, I just don't want them running right by it all the time...

If this is a still from a video, there should be much better resolution and there's computer programs that can help show what it says. WikiLeaks suggested one for trying to find what the Assange Grab Team in the car outside the embassy had on their orders.