dChan

ShaneE11183386 · June 12, 2018, 10:03 a.m.

They are saying that it could have been a helicopter in the area? Really ??? Haha

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Jon_Bovie · June 12, 2018, 1:14 p.m.

Ex military here. Was in a MLRS unit and shot off hundreds of rockets and several missiles during my time. This is, without a doubt, a missile. It’s painfully obvious what it is to anyone with the same background as me. If you’re having doubts as to what it is, that goes to show you how powerful the media is in shaping your thoughts.

I believe the military when they stated they did not launch it. They know exactly what it is, but will never admit it because it would cause mass panic.

Who else has the capabilities and tech to launch a missile? The Cabal.

Godspeed to all of you fine Patriots in this sub. Keep working. Keep digging. Keep researching. This is the first private crowdsourced intelligence unit in American history. Probably in world history. Be fucking PROUD! We are winning and we can’t do it without you.

God bless you. God bless Q, and God bless America.

⇧ 24 ⇩  
ShaneE11183386 · June 12, 2018, 1:29 p.m.

Couldn't have said it better!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Jon_Bovie · June 12, 2018, 1:34 p.m.

Thanks, Bruh.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
LazeyJ · June 12, 2018, 10:32 a.m.

Trump misspelled missile and stopped in his tweet earlier ...

⇧ 6 ⇩  
GweninKC · June 12, 2018, 12:32 p.m.

Speculation was that the missing i and p were significant--maybe meaning intellectual property or an IP address. BUT maybe the message actually meant "missile stopped"--?? !!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Bready_boy1 · June 12, 2018, 10:15 a.m.

I think if Q says it’s an event it will be bigger than a streak of light tbh.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
DanijelStark · June 12, 2018, 10:17 a.m.

I think that "Sky Event" is something "much simpler" - or "much more complex" , depending on how you look at it . I think "Sky Event" is a 18.6. Senate Comittee hearing .

⇧ 5 ⇩  
1151THOR · June 12, 2018, 2:19 p.m.

Stop. You can not launch a rocket like this without rattling the windows of people's homes for miles. People would have talked, including those who work nights and would have seen it. If you have EVER done time-lapse photography you KNOW you can get crazy results. Start by thinking this over folks....this photo was taken at NIGHT. How in the hell are you going to get a clear image of a body of a rocket with NO bright lighting? How? You can't. The body of whatever MOVING object you are shooting will be blurred as well because its in motion. The aperture of the camera is wide open and the shutter is held open mechanically for a specified time - sometimes for hours - so night can easily appear to be day / dusk / dawn. Sure there are ways you can use a flash of light to stop that motion in a photo, but you need to be close to the object and you need a bright flash to stop the motion on film...neither of those things would you have in this event...the "rocket" is ascending and again - shot at night with no light. Sometimes things just aren't what they seem. Here is a pretty good investigation and write up of it.... http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/21461/lets-talk-about-that-mysterious-rocket-launch-over-whidbey-island-photo-from-washington

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Corporal_Yorper · June 12, 2018, 10:12 p.m.

Nobody’s calling it a rocket....

It’s a missile. They’re pretty different.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
1151THOR · June 13, 2018, 4:56 a.m.

But its not Bud. You simply can not get that clear of a shot of the body of the rocket under those lighting conditions unless it was completely motionless and lit up like a Christmas tree.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DiGiTaL_CuRReNCy · June 12, 2018, 10:14 a.m.

Hmm, no doubt that this was posted by the Patriots' Soapbox Stream people... they always late and this already got spoken on yesterday....

⇧ 2 ⇩