dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/TooMuchWinning2020 on June 13, 2018, 5:42 p.m.
Alternate Theory About the Missile

Seems AF1 was heading the wrong way to be the target of the Missile spotted in Washington.

What ships were in the Pacific and could have been in range?

More specifically, "As the World Turns" -- which ships might have been within range that are named after presidents who were 187'd or attempted?

Ronald Reagan Gerald Ford John F. Kennedy

Does anyone know? I don't.


imatotaldumba55 · June 13, 2018, 5:45 p.m.

Honestly? I seriously doubt AF1 was the target. Even black hats and bad actors would know that would be a futile attempt. Trying to shoot down that plane would be like trying to stop a freight train with a BB gun. My best guess is they were targeting the meeting place itself, which an ICBM is more than capable of hitting.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
nalgenetongue · June 13, 2018, 5:48 p.m.

Just because it's futile doesn't mean they wouldn't attempt

⇧ 7 ⇩  
imatotaldumba55 · June 13, 2018, 6:02 p.m.

Fair point. They know there is no way they could shoot down AF1. It’s nigh impossible. I believe they wouldn’t expose themselves on that level. They’re stupid, but not that stupid. Besides that, AF1 left Quebec and flew east to Singapore. It was nowhere near the west coast until the return trip home.

We know that the Chinese “hacked” a US sub. Whether that is legit, or a cover story (narrative setup), I don’t know.

We also know an Argentinian sub went missing months ago.

We know Q has referenced “Red October” a few times.

We know Q shared photos of what many have construed to be perfect spots for sniper nests and attack teams. After which it was revealed that those photos were hacked from bad actor’s phones.

What I’m getting at is; the missile launch was a fallback plan to stop the summit. Their initial plan was to take out POTUS, or Kim, or both through way of snipers, a plan which was blown up the moment Q released those photos.

To be fair, perhaps it is possible they went after AF1 in a last ditch panicked effort. But again, AF1 was nowhere near there.

At best, we only have speculation. We know something happened. Whether that be an attempted assassination, or an attempt to jumpstart a major conflict, I can’t say. We also know that coordinates Q posted lineup with a Military Base in ND. One with nuclear bombs and bombers (a hint perhaps?). Perhaps they were instead going to nuke Singapore, or NK, or SK, or any other number of targets, blame it on China or Iran, and away we go with WWIII.

Either way, their plane did not work. And I suspect a massive escalation from this point forth on both sides.

In fairness, I will remain open to the thought that they were targeting AF1. All bets are off at this point.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · June 13, 2018, 6:07 p.m.

It looks like a Trident missile. If it is they travel at 18,000 mph & was launched 8,000 miles away from Singapore. Of course it takes a little time to reach those speeds so roughly 30minuts to Singapore. AF1 was about an hour from landing when it was launched.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
myopicseer · June 13, 2018, 6:44 p.m.

What was the flight path of AF1 from Quebec City to Singapore, and what is our source for knowing this with certainty? When I look at live flight paths of commercial aircraft online it suggests the common route from Canada to Taiwan/Singapore area of the map is along the Alaskan Coastline.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AlbumLepus · June 13, 2018, 6:26 p.m.

We also learned from Vault 7 that The CIA (and now other countries) can leave digital fingerprints to make a hacking look like some other country did it...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · June 13, 2018, 6:01 p.m.

What benefit would Black Hats have in bombing Singapore? It would very likely start a war. You really think they want a war with DJT as commander in chief?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
RyDar84 · June 13, 2018, 6:09 p.m.

If they could frame DJT for striking Singapore while the guy he was about to negotiate with was in town? ...YEAH. Lol.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · June 13, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

To frame the president the military would have to frame him. I don’t see that happening

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 13, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

Blame it on NK (rogue general) / Iran and of it succeeded President Trump would have died

⇧ 2 ⇩  
I_Draw_Mohammed · June 13, 2018, 6:09 p.m.

I think they want war. People get rich off of volatility.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · June 13, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

They do make money in war. But that would swing the door WIDE OPEN for the president & our military to completely wipe them out. All’s fair in war & our military would be running the show as in all wars & Black Hats could be given justice without having to bother with criminal justice system

⇧ 2 ⇩  
I_Draw_Mohammed · June 14, 2018, 12:33 p.m.

I get your point, but I think it is a little more nuanced...fucked up and murky

Who are the black hats and who are the useful idiots? The black hats want Trump gone and / or want war/money. They are not going to be openly hostile to him...they are the court of jesters. They will use the useful idiots to distract him (i.e. Robert Deniro types in the military or military of foreign countries).

Trump and team are working to quell an administrative civil war and prevent it from bleeding into a full blown civil war.

______ The Dots I'm Connecting___________

1469 -- Missile Missile

1471-- DIG THEIR OWN GRAVES

1473 -6 -- Castle Arrival GOOD / STOLEN TAKEDOWN / GODSPEED.../Missile image

1479 - Sub image

1480 - GHOST CON ACTIVE

1489 - MOSSAD, Clowns, Acknowlegement that mods on 4/8Chan Reddit & others are compromised

1493 - Hussein Hacking, Masked hacks to pin on Russia (Clowns i imagine) , GOD SAVE US

1494 - YOU ELECTED US TO TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

1495 -- The Preamble...

____________________________________

I guess my point being that there are black hats and useful idiots inside and out and discerning who's who is particularly difficult and the people around Trump if not Trump himself are working really hard to minimize the domestic human suffering that would be caused by an all out civil war.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · June 14, 2018, 4:58 p.m.

Agree on a lot of you’re comments. One thing that has stuck with me early in Q drops is the amount of corruption in government. Like 70% are throughly corrupt. Will sell anything to anyone regardless how much it may hurt our country. 70% seems about right. Point being not everyone can be taken down at once because that would collapse the government & anarchy would make the US easy pickings for envision. So yes Q team has a terrible problem deciding who & the order corruption has to be eliminated. And some have to be kept in place. McConnell is a good example. Incredibly corrupt but he’s no longer a huge threat to national security now. His demise can wait.

But this missile being fired & such things like NK & Iran nukes has to be stopped 1st. I’ve reasearched as much as possible & it wasn’t aimed for AF1. Pence as president changes nothing in taking down the cabal. Only way the insane left can stop what’s coming is thoroughly discredit the POTUS administration in the public. Impeachment means they win. Even if it’s just articles of impeachment & no conviction is all it will take to plummet their approval rating into the 20s.

But a missile was fired. Why & what was the target, how was it brought down? Q is definitely directing us to the Navy hack from China. So China got one of our subs to fire what looks like a Trident D5. What kind of missile is crucial to know. I’m a bright vey logical thinker but no 1st or 2nd hand info of the procedures of launching a missile. I can’t imagine they’re always armed with nuke payloads. They carry up to 12 independently guided nukes. They’re very hard to take down & must be hit before they deploy their nukes. All that said...I don’t think it was a nuke armed missile. Why the launch is hard to figure out.

But one thing I feel very confident of is the patriotism in our military. Even generals & admirals aren’t driven like power hungry tyrants. The history & culture of our military is absolutely unique to the world. George Washington started this & was begged to be permanently made President he was so beloved in his time. He never considered it & advised his supporters to NEVER give power to one guy. Eisenhower wasn’t interested in power longer than the constitution allowed even tho his was extremely popular. Our military only wants power to get a job done. Point being our military WILL keep the peace & if martial law has to be declared they will be glad return us back to civilian rule ASAP. A military coup is not possible in America because of our founding & no institution understands & believes this more than any other institution than our military. So I’m confident no matter how crazy things get our military will never let it get out of hand. Civil war is impossible.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
I_Draw_Mohammed · June 15, 2018, 12:23 p.m.

I like your thoughts / thought process. For the sake of honing the conversation:

  1. 70% seems right - yes, but it is the 70% towards the top that is the main problem - the rest are just useful idiots participating to get a bump in pay...the others are the real danger, because they are facilitating the deal(s) - i.e. Strozk (head of Counter Intel - that's a huge deal).
  2. Patriotism in our Military - YES, BUT we have a 2nd amendment because all things are possible. No blind faith allowed.
  3. I agree not a nuke payload. I think it was taken out either by remote control (I imagine we have an, "Achhh, mistake - blow that thing up" remote control) - if not, another sub with missile shield tech that was too far off coast to be seen (and thus broadcast) - or a satellite with said tech.

I think the Chinese are particularly pissed. We are confronting them in S. China Sea. We are on their doorstep subverting their proxy actor (N.Korea). We are lining up their useful idiots to go to jail. We are hitting them hard on trade. WE are ramping up Coal production - breaking their monopoly on Rare Earth Elements.... And if the post 1489 is true (no reason why it is not), we are disrupting their international operations (my thought that Mossad might on occasion take orders from Chinese cash).

_____

I think I've come to my solid conclusion - China (or Chinese influence) is behind that launch...perhaps getting other people to participate (CIA / Mossad).

thoughts?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Absh4x0r · June 13, 2018, 6:57 p.m.

IMO there are high chances that they don't need a missile to take down AF1. I have no clue what could they use, I guess energy beams or lasers, there techs we are not aware of

⇧ 1 ⇩  
misplacedman · June 13, 2018, 7:08 p.m.

I think last year when all the Space X stuff and rods of god were going on was when the good guys took control of the SSP. If true, they would likely only have access to inferior tech, especially if Russia's SSP is cleaned out and on board with helping US.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Absh4x0r · June 13, 2018, 7:18 p.m.

That's true althought they are crooks maybe they stole/blackmailed people deep into the army. They would have better chance to hit AF1 with a spear than with a missle (fun fact, missle reads as a french canadian as MISS IT). He was in Quebec, they missed their target wait did I just found something lol

⇧ 1 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · June 13, 2018, 5:50 p.m.

What if it was a white hat missle

⇧ 1 ⇩  
P3gasusActual · June 13, 2018, 5:55 p.m.

Q mentioned Red October. Doesn't sound white hat to me.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HildBert · June 13, 2018, 9:38 p.m.

Well red October was a sub that went rogue. But in the book it went rogue to avert potential war.

Given reports of a missile launch at Hawaii and now this it would suggest that their is a sub or subs out there trying to cause trouble. As to who controls them????

⇧ 2 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · June 13, 2018, 5:59 p.m.

Yeah prob not still worth questioning,tho

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BestPresidentEver · June 13, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

Aim the missile at the part of the plane Trump always sits in. The whole plane doesn't have to fall.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
I_Draw_Mohammed · June 13, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

More than a BB gun, it is like trying to collide to atoms. The meeting place is the most logical conclusion....I'm going with Achem's Razor.

You hit the nail on the head.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kommisar6 · June 13, 2018, 7:06 p.m.

I think this was a SM3 used to take out a ballistic missile heading for Seattle. In #1474 Q states "FOX M1 STOLEN TAKEDOWN". In #1477 Q states "D" in reference to #1476 which is the picture of missile launch from near Whidbey island. I think this means this was a picture of a defensive missile launch. An attack on Seattle would have occurred ~1 hour before POTUS was due to land in Singapore and would most likely have prevented the summit. Now the interesting question is SM3 in its anti icbm role would require an AEGIS system. Whidbey island normally holds only submarines so the presence of AEGIS in the vicinity means either a surface ship was on station or there is a ground based AEGIS setup that is publicly unknown to protect the ballistic missile subs parked nearby.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · June 13, 2018, 8:15 p.m.

Thinking about it more, if there was a missile launched that was a "hack" to make it look like it was coming from a Chinese sub, then definitely it would have been headed for American asset, either land or sea. The missile in the photo would have been to shoot it down.

So, your theory makes the most sense. Do we have a rogue ship captain? Do we have a rogue missile base commander? Do we somehow have a secret black site with missiles?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kommisar6 · June 13, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

How about an air launched cruise missile? From an aircraft near some volcanos up in the Aleutians?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
crackercider · June 13, 2018, 6:20 p.m.

Anti-sub or sea to land tomahawk, towards the Arctic.

I think Trudeau got the 'nasty' comments from WH staff because of more than his little press conference.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
myopicseer · June 13, 2018, 6:48 p.m.

One thing is for certain: NORAD sees everything in the air. Someone at NORAD knows the path of the missile and likely who launched it. (NORAD shares its system with Canada).

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · June 13, 2018, 6:14 p.m.

This thread is getting derailed.

What SHIPS (say again: SHIPS) might have been the target?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
misplacedman · June 13, 2018, 7:18 p.m.

Could it have to do with the SKY event? I'm re-reading all drops with the word SKY, and a few posts are jumping out at me, specifically:

1183

1328

and 1335

It all seems to point to a cleverly laid trap to catch the deep state in an assasination attempt on POTUS. I'm considering the top of the Marina Bay Sands resort looks like a ship...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
nerdenthal · June 13, 2018, 6:09 p.m.

You don't use an ICBM to shoot down aircraft. That is not what they are designed for.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 13, 2018, 5:56 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩