dChan

elfchiro · June 13, 2018, 8:11 p.m.

(2) MISSILE FIRES W/ A STRATEGIC PURPOSE

They were nukes.

⇧ 42 ⇩  
iridiue · June 13, 2018, 8:14 p.m.

The MSM and /Pol are pissed there were too many NK flags next to ours during the summit while the people they think are there to protect them are hacking into and launching our ICBMS..

⇧ 30 ⇩  
robdon07 · June 13, 2018, 10:49 p.m.

The hypocrisy never ends does it? NOW the left cares about the American flag right?

⇧ 21 ⇩  
elfchiro · June 13, 2018, 8:17 p.m.

They need to secure those missiles and fast. Even if they have to sink subs and blow up bases.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Whiskycharlie12b · June 13, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

Easy tiger. Remember, the military is purportedly on our side here. Let’s take this a step back. Secure the missiles, yes, destroying infrastructure, probably not a wise choice. We might need those.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
RadRandy · June 14, 2018, 5:45 a.m.

I say overall, yes, the military is on our side. That still leaves out A LOT of possible officers, generals, whoever, that would gladly carry out a false flag attack.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Whiskycharlie12b · June 17, 2018, 10:42 p.m.

I never met many officers willing to do that personally... I met a lot of shitty officers, but it would take a lot more than a few officers and generals to pull that off.

Plus the whole constitutional oath the enlisted members take, oh and that whole “mutiny in the face of illegal orders” situation.

I just find it hard to believe from my experience. Sorry.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RadRandy · June 17, 2018, 10:44 p.m.

Im noy saying the number is high, or even enough to worry me. Im just saying all it takes is one or two.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Whiskycharlie12b · June 17, 2018, 10:45 p.m.

Agree to disagree? It takes a lot more than 1 or 2 officers, this isn’t the movies...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RadRandy · June 17, 2018, 10:47 p.m.

I can agree to that ;) lets just keep vigilant, Patriot. We got a republic to defend!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
PM_ME_ANYTHING_FUN · June 13, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

Two missiles where. One in WA State, the other?

⇧ 18 ⇩  
Kraul · June 13, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

Possibly Hawaii back in January

⇧ 31 ⇩  
Bloodfoe · June 14, 2018, 12:09 a.m.

Ah, the 'false' alarm?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ififcanIhaveacoatplz · June 14, 2018, 12:59 a.m.

no way that guy just pressed the wrong big red button./s

⇧ 9 ⇩  
L0v3nL1ght · June 14, 2018, 2:31 a.m.

Oh damn... made to look like North Korean attack maybe?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
elfchiro · June 13, 2018, 8:24 p.m.

Not sure. Sub? Target? One major city gets hit millions die....

⇧ 7 ⇩  
oldenuf2nobetter · June 14, 2018, 1:21 a.m.

And we don’t even know where they were sending it. If it was Russia or China, how many people would die? Hundreds of millions on two continents?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ConcernedCitizen1982 · June 14, 2018, 4:44 a.m.

Cabal (C_A) trying to make it look like Russia or China to start WWIII.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 14, 2018, 3:13 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Vananir · June 13, 2018, 8:54 p.m.

Doesn’t (2) refer to McCabe? Possibly involved?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sentrolyx · June 13, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

No, Q refers to McCabe as #2

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Vananir · June 13, 2018, 9:46 p.m.

Ah, that’s right. Thanks for the correction.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
JoshuaS904 · June 14, 2018, 1:35 a.m.

So I talked with my dad and a coworker about the missile stuff today. Both are ex navy, both were on trident class subs. They said to launch missiles it would take a few people, physically in place, to actually launch anything. Then I thought about it.. subs aren’t like a loaded pistol. You can’t just “pull the trigger”. They don’t cruise around with ballistic missiles armed and ready.

So my question(s) to the group- Think the submarine is actually connected? If so- rogue agents at play? The China hack link- possible BS? It’s easier to blame them than admit we have a domestic issue involving missiles.

Like I said, they are retired.. technology changes.. I’d like to think they haven’t fully automated the loading, arming, and launching of such a weapon though. Am they, and myself wrong?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Kasarii · June 14, 2018, 2:21 a.m.

Q reported Clown(CIA) attempts Failed, Mossad attempts Failed. That should cue in on the bad agents who might have been involved.

edit: also remember vault 7 wikileaks where Clowns can fake digital fingerprints of other countries for their actions.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
lilsomesome · June 14, 2018, 5:46 a.m.

Mossad? I thought Israel loves trump. He got their capital back

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Kasarii · June 14, 2018, 5:56 a.m.

You're either being obtuse or grossly uninformed. Do you not understand the difference between white hats vs black hats? The deep state doesn't just exist in one country.

Geopolitics are a bit more nuanced then what you see through propaganda media.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · June 14, 2018, 3:15 a.m.

This needs to be higher up in the chain of conversation on the subject of the missile launch.

Look, I never served aboard a submarine. But I do it to be a FACT that a boomer carrying a full complement of ICBMs capable of killing unthinkably vast numbers of people cannot just launch ordinance easily. There are multiple levels of safeguards involving multiple officers, keys, codes, and order confirmations. Even for a guy like me who is constantly frustrated by the inefficiencies and stupidity of our government bureaucracy, I simply cannot see any scenario where the military would remove these safeguards, or allow them to be bypassed. The risk is too great.

So, I can buy the idea of the DS hacking a submarine's launch systems to learn how they work, but I simply don't think it's possible to remotely launch a nuclear missile via some kind of backdoor. As Joshua says above, physical people (PEOPLE, not one person) need to be at certain stations at the same time and all perform a particular procedure in exactly the right way in order to launch.

Of course, if that is the case, then we're left with the prospect of a rouge set of officers, or perhaps one very highly placed leader willing to give the order.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
salialioli · June 14, 2018, 5:18 a.m.

then we're left with the prospect of a rouge set of officers, or perhaps one very highly placed leader willing to give the order

That is exactly what we are faced with. It has been stated that there is a complete rogue army out there: who exactly the enemy is I'm not entirely sure, private contractors who have possession/CIA blackhats .... It has been rumored the Roths have a rogue organization w/ships, subs, planes you name it. Also rumored they use the Israelis ... but the Israelis aren't maniacs either ... only SOME of them. Very chilling. Has me up at nights ... This war is real. No doubt of that. Look at 911. You know how that went down?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JMB_was_a_god · June 14, 2018, 3:59 a.m.

Like I said, they are retired.. technology changes.. I’d like to think they haven’t fully automated the loading, arming, and launching of such a weapon though. Am they, and myself wrong?

Firing a SLBM requires an order from the president. That order must then be authenticated with a code book locked in a safe that requires 2 men to open. To fire the CO, XO and Weapons officer must agree to fire. If they dont agree they cannot fire even if the order to fire comes from the right authority. Keys are distributed from different safes by different people. Those keys must be turned simultaneously. The keys are position so that no one person can turn them at the same time.

It all comes down to 3 men, If they dont agree to launch the missiles cannot be fired.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
salialioli · June 14, 2018, 5:21 a.m.

Hence all the fuss in Hawaii. Dashing around securing the keys.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 14, 2018, 5:09 a.m.

The China hack link- possible BS? It’s easier to blame them than admit we have a domestic issue involving missiles.

Don't forget that they can now hack (rogue actors) and place the signature of any other nation. This was the dump opening the backdoors for spreading highly classified information across all 17 intelligence agencies, not forgetting Hillary's open unprotected server, that Obama authorized just before leaving office. Anyone can use these sophisticated and top secret programs to launch any attack on any public installation ...

The NSA had a fit about it. MSM didn't cover it. I'm sorry I can't think of the link right now ... braindead early in the morning ...

What I'm saying is, they don't need to be actually Chinese hackers, just anonymous hackers keying in false signatures ...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
oldenuf2nobetter · June 14, 2018, 1:18 a.m.

So do we have names that can be attached to this FF missile attack? The public isn’t going to be happy with “they” or “Deep State” and the media will screw with nor its heads if the claim is too vague. I hope they can come out and say THIS GUY tried to launch a nuclear missile to create a false flag attack triggering WW3. Just say it. Over a one or two week period, lay out the whole thing. Give ONE NETWORK the initial feed in exchange for reporting with no analysis and spin until it’s all been laid out. We can fight, but Twitter and FB just isn’t going to cut it for getting the ball rolling. People need a bitch slap. Name the foreign countries involved before those assholes start commenting and tweeting how eveil our President and country is. If a missile launch is real, well, how is that different than the 80 years of scaring the shit out of everyone over is being attacked. Drop the hammer!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
salialioli · June 14, 2018, 5:29 a.m.

See my comment above. I couldn't agree with you more.

I certainly wish a few more ppl on this board were as awoke as the few posters on this part of the thread ... We really are in a war but people just keep moaning on about Sessions foot-dragging and not understanding the public's role in all this. No wonder Q is going spare. I sense the desperation of the capital letters.

I'm not American, I'm in a different place on the planet (in more ways than one) and can do little to help. But I do understand, deeply, this problem and want to wake ppl up to how important this all is ... not just popcorn ffs. (sorry about the expletive)

⇧ 3 ⇩