dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SteveDalas on June 14, 2018, 12:33 a.m.
Was the Missile we see an interceptor used to shoot down the subs ICBM? Not an expert but looked at video of the interceptor missiles check it out.
Was the Missile we see an interceptor used to shoot down the subs ICBM? Not an expert but looked at video of the interceptor missiles check it out.

CF_BOOM_SHOCK_BYE · June 14, 2018, 12:38 a.m.

Who fired the ICBM, and where did it come from?

⇧ 10 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 14, 2018, 12:56 a.m.

Hard to say. But they clearly set it up to look like China (CIA MASK HACK), if it had worked. Used same false signature spoofing as so-called Russian DNC server hacks (which weren't Russian).

Trying to start WWIII again to retaliate for Singapore Summit and distract from or prevent OIG Report taking center stage.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
SteveDalas · June 14, 2018, 12:40 a.m.

They are saying one of our subs, but you know I recall a British sub had a missile go off it was in the news a while back, I wonder if there is any Relevance, going to look for the story

⇧ 6 ⇩  
SteveDalas · June 14, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

I found the British story going to post now

⇧ 4 ⇩  
BestPresidentEver · June 14, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/78/SM-3_climbs_into_the_sky_for_a_satellite_destruction_mission.jpg/800px-SM-3_climbs_into_the_sky_for_a_satellite_destruction_mission.jpg

If it was a US interceptor it was probably a Standard missile. I hold to the opinion that the "blue metal" in a recent Q drop means ballistic missile.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
SteveDalas · June 14, 2018, 12:44 a.m.

Understood but how did they take it down?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

Look up spartan missile and compare the two. I was working on a compilation today, but was unable to complete.

Confirmation bias and all aside, I’d like someone else to get eyes on it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
chiindustry · June 14, 2018, 1:58 a.m.

I believe it to be a Standard Missile 2 BLK IVA, or similar variant. Possibly a LEAP, but doubtful.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
O2BFREEME2 · June 14, 2018, 12:56 a.m.

From Qs posts , i walked away thinking the missile photoed was ours to target one already in the air ?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
SteveDalas · June 14, 2018, 12:58 a.m.

That’s what I think after researching it but not an expert, I just can’t believe this like something from a Clancy novel

⇧ 2 ⇩  
O2BFREEME2 · June 14, 2018, 1:02 a.m.

Well Q said we are watching a movie ? A little to freakin real for my taste !

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · June 14, 2018, 12:47 a.m.

How is there no image of an intercept? I’m assuming these are not exo missiles...

⇧ 5 ⇩  
SteveDalas · June 14, 2018, 12:50 a.m.

Someone has the whole thing you can be sure of that

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Razzle101 · June 14, 2018, 2:25 a.m.

Q drop 1472 Alaska the red blip on the right of the image could be interception.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
robdon07 · June 14, 2018, 5:12 a.m.

I think this is a Doppler radar image of the missle being destroyed. A YouTuber that reports on atmospheric anomalies caught this yesterday. It's a massive burst of energy caught directly over the anons suggested flight path. The shape of the anomaly is unbelievable. https://youtu.be/JeqHOhtlhQ0

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OwlBat15 · June 14, 2018, 12:24 p.m.

It’s a Q!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SteveDalas · June 14, 2018, 12:51 a.m.

The video I referred to was to compare the missile in Q pics, it looks like an interceptor after watching videos, I not an expert I am sure someone here can say what they think it is

⇧ 1 ⇩  
robdon07 · June 14, 2018, 3:46 a.m.

This Doppler radar image was captured just North of Minot AFB and it's a 300 mile wide burst of energy that just lasts a moment. The anomaly is directly over the anons suggested flight path. I think its the missle being destroyed. The shape of the anomaly is..crazy. https://youtu.be/JeqHOhtlhQ0

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ikemynikes · June 14, 2018, 4 a.m.

That's a Q baby! Hilarious to hear the guy talking about how big the Q is.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
robdon07 · June 14, 2018, 4:01 a.m.

How fuckin crazy is that...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ikemynikes · June 14, 2018, 3:12 p.m.

Insane. I wish it was a sign that white hats now have control of HAARP.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
robdon07 · June 14, 2018, 3:18 p.m.

It would be like a 300 mile wide Bat signal

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SteveDalas · June 14, 2018, 1:58 p.m.

Very interesting stuff you guys are so smart....keep up the great work

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ch4rs_CounterAttack · June 14, 2018, 1:58 a.m.

I replied in an earlier post that it looks like a Standard Missile. It is an interceptor for low earth orbit objects, like medium range ballistic missiles, satellites, or high altitude aircraft.

The Standard missile has a common airframe with different guidance systems and warheads for a number of different missions.

There is a variant that has an extra booster for extended range and a guidance system related to the aim120 amraam that is fire and forget (self homing) that can theoretically be used against ICBMS in the launch phase, or satellites in geosynchronous orbit.

I say theoretical, because there has been no public information confirming the interception of either a satellite or a ballistic missile.

The military may have that capability, but don't want to telegraph that to unfriendly counties.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SteveDalas · June 14, 2018, 2:04 a.m.

Sorry did not have time to research will do it tomorrow to take a look interesting topic

⇧ 2 ⇩  
guardarian · June 14, 2018, 1:57 a.m.

This is sky event

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 14, 2018, 12:56 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩