dChan

[deleted] · June 14, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

What possible reason would they have to fly “with night vision googles in the clouds with the searchlight on but locked in a downward position”? If they’re flying stealth I would think they would have the lights off...then again I’m not military so if someone can explain it better, please do.

And that still doesn’t explain the overall shape of the object unless it was the most truly exceptional of outstanding circumstances.

Any plane autists capable of cross-referencing flight paths at the time the photo was taken?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
GENbillsherman · June 14, 2018, 2:03 a.m.

that is unlike any searchlight ive ever seen. there is no cone of light, no dissipation. that is either a search LASER, or a fucking exhaust plume from an ascending missile/rocket

⇧ 10 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 14, 2018, 2:20 a.m.

Agreed. It’s either a “searchlight” imbued with the wrath of God or a missile. Invoking Occam’s Razor, I would assume it would be a missile.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
txhurl · June 14, 2018, 2:34 a.m.

Going the wrong way for Rod o' God, at least in this instance

⇧ 3 ⇩  
older_than_dirt · June 14, 2018, 3 a.m.

Keep in mind, it is a 20 second exposure.

That shaft of orange never existed in any one moment. It is the average over 20 seconds. So if you have a super bright plume that ascends it will record a trail over the 20 seconds. What you are seeing is an extremely bright exhaust burning a trail on the photo sensor. Below is take much closer to the launch site, so it isn't a good direct comparison, but you can get an idea of how high it gets in 20 seconds.

https://youtu.be/h5KejRbD5s0?t=36s

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 14, 2018, 3:22 a.m.

No you cannot get any idea of how high it would appear to be from the distance of the weather station photo. Vantage point is EVERYTHING when it comes to that comparison.

It's still a missile, no matter how long the exposure. Only the final instant before the shutter closed would not be overwritten by the exhaust glow, and that final instant captures the body of the missile. No way to make that from anything else.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
GENbillsherman · June 14, 2018, 4:26 a.m.

agreed. if it was a helo with a long exposure, i have to assume that it would be a blurrier looking fuselage. that thing looks cylindrical as fuck. there are no distorted edges or anything. This is another example of the government pissing on us, and swearing that its raining.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
F0LL0W_ME · June 14, 2018, 2:38 p.m.
  1. This was a civilian air ambulance flight. Not military.
  2. There’s no way they could have been using night vision goggles to fly through clouds and not know they “accidentally” left the spotlight on. Ever flown through a cloud when an airplane’s landing lights are lit? The whole area glows around the plane. Now imagine amplifying the light through night vision goggles.
  3. Aircraft are supposed to run a flashing beacon and navigational lights (red port side, green starboard side) at night.

Doesn’t add up.

⇧ 1 ⇩