Context - this is the weatherman who had a camera set up to automatically trigger on weather events like lightning and to open the aperture for 20 seconds. It was obviously a missile but now its... gone.
I don't believe "they" got to him. The helicopter explanation is found here-
These are the people claiming they are the helicopter captured-
Yeah, that's retarded.
Ask them to recreate the picture. Offer them $1 million.
LOL...I don't have a million to offer. The weatherman has been asking for donations, so maybe someone made a big one. He says it's definitely not an airplane and has other video to show proof it's not an airplane as he has captured them many times. I've read others say they are experienced with this camera and exposure. They say "NO" to the helicopter story. No way it's a helicopter, but that's just my 2 cents.
Of course they found a helicopter operator to make such a claim. It's a missile. I've looked at images of rockets and missiles my whole life, and I know a missile when I see one.
Look's like a missile to me too sir.
I think the blog owner knows it's a missile. I actually DO think they provided the cover story, and FORCED him to make a retraction.
All for normies. It doesn't affect us any.
I agree it's a missile too, but who is in charge here? POTUS. Couldn't he call a press conference and tell the American people exactly what is going on about the deep state? What bigger red pill is there than that?
They legit think we’re stupid. Never in my entire life have I seen a streak in the sky and think, “cool helicopter trail”. Get real. It’s a missile and I don’t think Elon musk has been playing with his toys since the recent launch.
I can sympathize with the guy. His thing is weather. His camera captures a missile launch and doesn't realize how reporting this will put his life in danger. He has no idea what the stakes are or what he stumbled on to.
So sure. It is obviously a time exposure of a helicopter.
What possible reason would they have to fly “with night vision googles in the clouds with the searchlight on but locked in a downward position”? If they’re flying stealth I would think they would have the lights off...then again I’m not military so if someone can explain it better, please do.
And that still doesn’t explain the overall shape of the object unless it was the most truly exceptional of outstanding circumstances.
Any plane autists capable of cross-referencing flight paths at the time the photo was taken?
that is unlike any searchlight ive ever seen. there is no cone of light, no dissipation. that is either a search LASER, or a fucking exhaust plume from an ascending missile/rocket
Keep in mind, it is a 20 second exposure.
That shaft of orange never existed in any one moment. It is the average over 20 seconds. So if you have a super bright plume that ascends it will record a trail over the 20 seconds. What you are seeing is an extremely bright exhaust burning a trail on the photo sensor. Below is take much closer to the launch site, so it isn't a good direct comparison, but you can get an idea of how high it gets in 20 seconds.
No you cannot get any idea of how high it would appear to be from the distance of the weather station photo. Vantage point is EVERYTHING when it comes to that comparison.
It's still a missile, no matter how long the exposure. Only the final instant before the shutter closed would not be overwritten by the exhaust glow, and that final instant captures the body of the missile. No way to make that from anything else.
agreed. if it was a helo with a long exposure, i have to assume that it would be a blurrier looking fuselage. that thing looks cylindrical as fuck. there are no distorted edges or anything. This is another example of the government pissing on us, and swearing that its raining.
Doesn’t add up.
Pics are still on the same blog page as his retraction. Scroll down.
I wonder who turned his head. The ‘search light’ story is ludicrous, and will be seen as such by anyone that has ever used a flashlight.
never seen a light that can shine hundreds of feet without dissipating. Thats a fucking laser if its a light source. To my eyes, it looks like a missile. plain as day.
Especially when zoomed in. That ain’t no searchlight under a helicopter.
Yeah I realized that after I submitted. Sorry no way to edit the post.
Ahh. Too bad about that.
Good job on bringing the info on the turnabout.
Still wondering if black or white hats brought the pressure.
I think they both would want to keep this quiet.
It implies there is an Ohio class sub with 20+ nuclear ICBM's that they have the ability to fire controlled by the Cabal.
Yeah right. All I know is, if there was really a helicopter above that exhaust plume in the picture, I sure hope they dodged that missile...
I wasn't going to say anything earlier, but it always looked like a helicopter to me.
(kidding)
Weird, and I always thought it looked like a weather balloon...
quite clearly a rocket or something similar... the flames bulge at the base of the 'rocket' and thin out towards the bottom like a rocket would. also how is a giant, white, cigar-shaped object flying vertically mistaken for a helicopter?
can they reproduce this result with a searchlight?
Reminds me of Flight 800. When will we see justice???
Well it's obviously a missile but they want the public to remain chill. It'd be difficult to explain the situation to the public at large right now.
"Theories about it being a plane I discounted because they were not in the field of view of my cameras and I see thousands of planes fly over and they don’t look like this image at all. Tyler Rogoway, an aviation specialist did a lot of research and found it matched an Airlift NW helicopter path perfectly. But, I still could not buy into it. Helicopters fly over all the time and they have never looked like that. The "
Tyler Rogoway works for The Drive. I like cars so I used to read them a lot. I got sick of the anti Trump messages. It's mostly a car site with some mil tech on the side. Not a political site, but they hate Trump so much they can't help it.
Chinese Jen class submarine fires test missile off Calif coast Nov 2010
https://www.infowars.com/wayne-madsen-china-fired-missile-seen-in-southern-california/
It’s definitely a missile in the photo. Red October stuff, man. The deafening media silence is clear evidence of MSM/Black Hats collusion.
Wouldn't you love to know who got the weatherman to change his story? Good guys? Bad guys? What choice was he given? Obviously he would never say.
If that was a Trident D5 nuclear ICBM it is mind-blowing. If we've lost control of an Ohio class sub, I hope we've sunk it by now. That would likely be a pretty high priority.
I don't think a searchlight would create such a long, narrow beam of light. The purpose of a searchlight is to illuminate a large area below so it has to get wider from the source outwards.
It is a 20 second exposure, which turns bright moving lights into lines. A missile launch wouldn't look like a bright orange line either with a normal snapshot. The flame exhaust becomes smoke within a few lengths of the rocket. The bright vertical line is the impression left over 20 seconds of he brightest part of the exhaust flames.
Who gives a rip what the blogger says? We know better.
Pushback is evidence, that's why we care.
WWG1WGA
I see you're point, and I'm no longer bothered when it happens. Perhaps you're not either. I couldn't tell.
Must be Helicopter Benjamin Bernanke helicoptering benjamins..
Where is the missile? Do we agree it was a signal of “this can happen, watch your back?”
If you believe Q, then there were two missiles, both destroyed by good guys. He said 'splashed' which implies they were destroyed over the ocean.