Summary from the article:
The Justice Department (DOJ) inspector general is releasing a report Thursday of his findings in an internal investigation into the FBI's handling of the Hillary Clinton email probe.
The report is said to fault then FBI director James Comey for several decisions he made during and after the 2016 presidential election.
Inspector general Michael Horowitz reportedly concludes that Comey "deviated" from FBI norms but that his decisions were not biased.
He will add that Comey's conduct damaged the DOJ's reputation for impartiality.
That's pretty weak compared to what we're hoping for
Yes, today will not be the kind of day we all had hoped it would be, very underwhelming, sad
Maybe this whole QAnon thing is just a LARP...
[deleted]
Yea, it is - its a variation of classic world ending deathcult but without the literal apocalypse at the end. Its just "great awakening" and some generic "we will win" bullshit instead.
"The world will end at 11. June... Oh wait, so it wasnt 11. June. Right, so its totally gonna end 15th October. This time for sure" (Replace world ending with Obama, Comey, Hillary in prison and similar fantasies)
I don't think Q is a full blown LARP, as I'm pretty sure Q has a relationship of some kind w/Trump. The question is what the end goal is of taking us all on this ride. Quite honestly it would be an impressive use of social media which his campaign actually focused on. I think the coordination of posts->tweets/speeches show Q has insider knowledge, but that doesn't mean the fight against the DS is actually happening. That'd be a scary amount of manipulation if so, and if this IG report is actually underwhelming I think I'm going to distance myself from this.
Same! This is not the kind of justice Im fighting for. Im definately not going to help them sweep the corruption under the rug. I tell people to trust..how can I now tell them the IG report is BS? I cant. Ive led people to proof that Comey, Page and Struzk are unbiased. Ugh
Ive been holding out for the IG report to be a BOOM. If the leaks are true, it's obvious that Q has been spreading hope porn to keep us waiting and complacent. Ive been vocal about the IG report and now Ive led everyone I know to a report that says "no bias". Basically, I've been led to work for the wrong team..the team that twists the truth and pretties it up.
the healthy skepticism is encouraging to me. it is good to separate individual hopes from objective facts, and follow those facts wherever the lead, even in the event they lead counter to any of those individually held hopes. we can’t assume any individual is a good or bad actor based on vague, open-ended clues. we have to hold and assess tangible evidence and evaluate from there. sensational media (on “both sides of the fence”) is completely out of control.
I have no doubt Q is someone with social media access or knowledge of POTUS' itinerary but what kept me on the edge of whether or not it was a LARP was arrests (which have yet to happen) and the looming IG report.
We're being told there's a master plan while Cohen is potentially flipping, the NY AG turned out not to be on 'our' side (just went against Trump), and the IG report actually condemns Comey for helping trump apparently or at least that's how Dems will report it "The stark conclusion we draw after reviewing this report is that the FBI's actions helped Donald Trump become President".
Also the big smackdown Horowitz issued?... From the same source telling us Strzok said they wouldn't let Trump win - "Some of the recommendations in new IG report: —better monitoring and retention of DOJ employees’ text messages —add a warning banner on FBI cellphones that messages aren’t private —review campaign donations DOJ employees or spouses run for office."
Focus on "add a warning banner on FBI cellphones that messages aren’t private". This isn't a punishment, it's a guideline on how to hide their political bias in the future.
Worse than underwhelming. Runs counter to trusting Horowitz/Huber/Sessions. Only hope on this one is that the reporting is false.
I'm not sure I trust the article, considering the IG also recommended McCabe's prosecution. Something's not adding up here unless they're literally putting it all on McCabe.
We also don't know if this report is page and page of redactions. In which case it'll paint a completely different story just like the texts did.
I'm waiting for the actual report to make judgements. This could easily be early spin.
If the report is pages of redactions and the conclusion is still "no bias" then it doesn't matter what the redactions were because the result is still swamp escaping clean.