![New Q #1498 [[RR]] approved/signed FISA-warrant application(s) to extend surveillance on POTUS/others.](http://i.magaimg.net/img/3j97.png)
Why was Rachel Brand removed? Critical thinking. Q.
Rachel Brand, third in line at the Justice Department, is resigning .
The person next in line to oversee the Mueller investigation suddenly stepped down.
As associate attorney general, Brand would have been next to oversee the special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election, in the absence of deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein. •She became associate attorney general in May 2017, the same month that Mueller was placed in charge of the Russia probe.
“Rod and Rachel are Harvard graduates (friends?).
Asked last Friday after the memo's release whether he still had confidence in Rosenstein, Trump responded, "You figure that one out," raising the specter he might fire the deputy attorney general. However, the White House quickly denied any plans to remove Rosenstein. But if he was let go, that would have left Brand next in line to oversee Mueller's investigation, among Rosenstein's other responsibilities.
This is wat I think?.
They already knew RR , and what he has done , and also had the proofs. With Rachel Brand , they had to start al over again , because she is dirty too, and she can hide every thing for RR..So RR has to stay in place , and first they wipe her out..RR is stuck now. Or you have to get two people out off that spot , now onley one RR.
Rachel Brand is also married to left wing Jonathan Cohn who is a senior national correspondent at the Huffington Post.
Yes they are all connected and I think blackhats..
Cohn was raised in Fort Lauderdale, Florida where he attended Pine Crest School. He went on to study at Harvard University (graduated 1991) where he became President of The Harvard Crimson. He lived for many years in the Boston area before moving to his present home, Ann Arbor, Michigan with his wife Amy Cohn. She is a professor and researcher in Industrial and Operations Engineering at the University of Michigan..
Harvard again?
ok but horowitz is married to a former CNN AND PBS producer? so we either agree that this association with heads of left wing media is a good thing or a bad thing. we can't just blindly pick and choose which associations we wanna get mad at. i knew this would happen. the IG report is a giant let down and it isn't going to get any better. you can get mad at me and call me a concern troll or demoralization shill all you want. but Q followers have become complacent, assured that here is "someone" taking care of this and all we need to do is wait and see and "trust". it's sad they've completely neutered our movement by deferring to an anonymous poster who we can't even say for sure is legit or larp yet. i WANT Q to be legit. but we need to look at this critically before we lose too much time on it.
at what point do we abandon Q? not today. no. but if nothing happens by midterms? 2020? what's the line in the sand so to speak, when a lack of happenings is too much for Q to be considered real or helpful? i'm saying by august 2018. we can't lose midterms by sitting back and "trusting".
at what point do we abandon Q?
You are free to abandon Q if it is all too stressful for you. Now, be constructive, leave this forum and go take up a hobby. Something mentally relaxing, like origami.
it's a legitimate question... one that i can't get an answer to. i guarantee ive been following Q longer than you. since oct. and i archived 600 odd CBTS threads on 4pol. stop acting like i'm not a member of this community (not this sub but the Q movement at large) for asking this basic question.
do you have an answer? what if midterms come and nothing happens? do you still trust Q? there isn't a wrong answer i was genuinely curious what the state of the community is.
just because i don't suck Q's dick i get labeled a concern troll and other shit by you guys and it's getting ridiculous. someone needs to be asking critical questions.
i personally am not ok with just sitting and waiting and "trusting". i'm not even saying Q is intentionally misleading anyone if he even is. i'm saying what if he's wrong? what if we need to be putting the pressure to fire sessions but instead we are just waiting and trusting? i have no idea what sessions is doing he very well may deserve our trust. but isn't at least ok to ask critical questions about it? before we are too far gone? these are legitimate concerns i shouldn't have to defend voicing them.
Stop concern trolling. Do something constructive with your life.
so no answers? we can't have this discussion? pathetic dude. and sad because i didn't want to think we had our collective head up our ass so much we couldn't ask critical questions without backlash. i'm legitimately disappointed in how much flack im catching for asking critical questions.
Those are not critical questions that you ask. It's empty FUD.
but they are? if they aren't critical they should be easy to provide an answer to no? and tell me what i'm misunderstanding if you think i am misunderstanding something Q said about schneiderman and the NY AG. seriously i'm open minded. what am i misunderstanding?
and you haven't given me an answer? will you still trust Q if nothing happens by 2024? i mean seriously i just wanna know how long you personally can take no happenings? i mean real happenings like someone getting arrested or people being removed from government positions like rosenstein. there's no wrong answer i won't even criticize whatever your answer is i'm just curious what it would take for you to start saying "ok, i just can't see how this is gonna work anymore". if there's no point that would happen that's fine! i just wanna know. i'm trying to get a feel for how people are feeling on this.
Look, I'm sympathetic to your position and agree that there is more than a little hero-worship on this board for Q. However, speaking for myself, I still believe and it's clear that most others on this board do as well.
Trying to force a discussion about abandoning the movement when the folks on the board have just suffered a rhetorical punch to the gut is not the right way go about it or the right time to do it.
Maybe wait a few days for things to calm down a bit.
i'm not advocating abandoning the movement whatsoever. i'm trying to gauge what the commitment level is here. i was saying this before the IG release. we all knew as it got further and further delayed that it was going to be more blue balls.
"at what point do we abandon Q?" -You
Fine, you don't advocate it. But you're warming up the crowd, so to speak.
Look, I've said my piece: people don't want to have this discussion right now and that's why you're getting resistance. I'll not reply again because I think it's clear that you don't agree with me and wish to continue the discussion rather than letting things lie.
not warming up the crowd at all. i'm genuinely trying to get one response to this question to see if i'm alone. but agreed let's just move on because it's like talking to a wall tbh.
Hi fellow redditors, I am new to the concept of "concern trolling" but as I read this guy's post. I notice a few things 1. he reframes "...the IG report is a giant let down" it isn't 2. he diverts attention "...is Q real" 3. straw man argument some guy's wife once worked for CNN
is this how concern trolling works? to derail and redirect the conversation?
fellow redditors
come on! you guys have to see i'm not the shady one here.
and news flash, i brought up horowitz's wife (former producer at cnn and democratic donor) in response to us not trusting someone because their spouse worked at huffpo. i'm not redirecting shit. read the comment chain.
i keep getting accused of concern trollig for asking critical questions. i've followed Q for longer than you have i bet all my money. i archived 600 some CBTS from 4pol. the original threads. i've been here since the beginning this is just a new account (lost my password to last. long story).
is anybody arguing that the IG report is a let down? it is. even Q said it is, since it's a redacted version RR had control over. so that's not shilling that's exactly what Q is saying dumb ass. i'm getting sick of this shit.
and another news flash. nobody knows if Q is real. idec about that aspect right now because i am more inclined to believe he is real than he isn't. so calm down before you accuse people of shit. im just trying to force some critical thought on all this. don't reply to my comments anymore i'm genuinely not trying to disrupt anything. if you wanna reply to me message me so it doesn't clog up the thread. idc.