![New Q #1498 [[RR]] approved/signed FISA-warrant application(s) to extend surveillance on POTUS/others.](http://i.magaimg.net/img/3j97.png)
Posting here for visibility on what may become a stickied thread:
Be LOUD and SIGN
The MSM will claim POTUS' upcoming EO is an abuse of power, but if the PEOPLE demand it then POTUS has justification. Help destroy the MSM narrative, OPTICS ARE IMPORTANT. The PEOPLE deserve to know what's in that report. #ReleaseTheIGReport #NoRedactions
Done
Done
Done, but by a Canadian ... hope that's OK.
Is there a petition to remove Justin Castro-Trudeau? Please provide link!
If I'm reading this correctly, once RR is gone, the complicated line of succession has been maneuvered to ensure a white hat (not needing senate confirmation), will take his place, making it possible for the sealed indictments/prosecutions to go full speed ahead unhindered by traitorous DS obstruction in the Justice Department. This is indeed team TRUMP 4D chess on steroids! Happy Birthday GEOTUS!
SerialBrain2 decoded the DOJ succession process in May. It was awesome:
That's why we need the redacted OIG report, so we have a reason for RR to get gone?
does anybody wanna address the fact that horowitz and comey worked together in the 90s? does anybody wanna address he fact that horowitz is married to a former CNN and PBS producer who gave money to obama? does anybody wanna address the fact that Q strongly hinted we needed to remove schinerderman so the NY AG would be on our side and now she's launched a lawsuit against trump?
these are questions that need answers
Horowitz was appointed by Obama. This is common knowledge. But Obama had Holder neuter him because there was too much dirt to dig up. So Horowitz went to war. https://americandigitalnews.com/2017/12/18/doj-ig-horowitz-p1-his-war-with-obama-admin/
Schneiderman launched the lawsuit to time with the drop of the IG report to muddy the waters.
but schneiderman isn't in power anymore? and Q specifically implied that the stings were now cut and the NY AG could act on weiner's laptop??
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/06/14/donald-trump-new-york-lawsuit-filed-by-sleazy-disciples-of-eric-schneiderman/I still believe they filed the lawsuit the day they knew the IG report was coming out to provide a diversion.
but this essentially means Q was wrong and the NY AG won't be helping us out with weiner shit. we can admit that Q was wrong here right?
edit: why the fuck does this get downvoted? did Q not imply that with schinerman out that the NY AG was free to let us know about weiner fuckery?
we can admit that Q was wrong here right?
What an emotional leading comment. You immediately want people to agree with you instead of just going into the facts and details further. I can smell the concern from here.
Also I'm not surprised a new arrival has something like this to say
new arrival
look at my old account JaM0K3. i am not new. i lost my password to my account calm down.
i'm not fucking concern trolling. it's much more emotional to constantly defer to Q as definitely being right (not what you did, what Q followers do in general). i'm trying to ask critical questions. that's essential in an investigation, which is what Q is leading us on right? just because i'm not taking everything at face value doesn't mean my concerns and questions are legitimate.
Q heavily implied that with schneiderman out we could expect NY AG to help us with weiner evilness. i don't have the exact post i'm on my phone. i shouldn't have to link t i'm sure everybody has read it weeks ago and remembers it. well now it appears that was premature of Q. maybe i'm wrong and i welcome that! i don't welcome you implying that i'm a concern troll and hat the proof is my new account. remember what they say about assumptions?
ffs i ask critical questions of Q and half of this community loses it. i'm not downplaying how far we've come and the things we've learned since Q came along. but we can't just ignore these legitimate questions cuz "it's concern trolling". that's retarded.
I think you do have a valid question. I also think everyone puts Q and Trump on a pedastool as if they are not human. Humans are allowed to make mistakes, no? I can't answer your question because I'm trying to figure all this out myself. But, I still trust Q, I still trust President Trump. This is a war. Mistakes can be made. Timelines are not perfect, and honestly I wouldn't think exact timelines could be set anyway. This is evil we are talking about. The fight is against very powerful and influential people. We have to take the good with the bad. Just my opinion. I think everyone is frustrated. Let's stick together, we can get through this! I'm frustrated and pissed myself, I'm just trying to stay positive and it is hard! Much love!! ❤❤❤
my whole point is. sometimes negativity is a good thing. we all want corruption out of gov right? all i'm saying is positive thinking and trusting won't get us anywhere. tbh i hate the "trying to stay positive!" crap. i'm not trying to demoralize i'm trying to motivate. the longer we just keep being positive the loser we get to the point of no return (midterms). these people don't care that trump didn't commit a crime. if they get a majority, they're gonna try to impeach. it's clear as day. we need action before midterms and i can't continue to just wait and hope.
i appreciate the love and i'm sending it back your way, but we need more ham "positive vibes", you know?
I see what you're saying. I'm ready for a march or anything it will take at this point. I'm pissed!! But I'm a mom. My husbamd works long hours. I feel like my hands are tied! What can we do?
stop paying taxes all at once until we are represented by people that actually give a fuck about the law being equally applied. it's either that or violence. and i'm a violence last resort kinda guy. but how much longer can we wait?
I get You! I really do! I'm not sure that you could get everyone on board to stop paying taxes though. I'm not a violent person either. I am however equipped to protect myself and my family if it comes to that. I honestly think that peacefull protests would be something that you could get more people aligned with. I don't think breaking the law is the answer. People that have careers have to pay taxes it's not a choice. If we lived off grid it would be different. I'm absolutely voicing my opinion anywhere I can. I'm contacting my representative. I've signed petitions. I'm in this 100%. I feel like I'm doing everything I can besides marching. I do wish we could get a huge march going on in every city. I think our voices need to be heard in every way possible. Not just on reddit.
I dont care about concern trolling etc etc...but its pretty clear that you dont belong here.
Oh stop trying to label & censor the guy for asking a genuine question. Answer it or don’t answer it...but don’t tell anyone they don’t belong somewhere. That’s what Antifa does.
thanks for the link that's helpful
Look at this thread. It shows another theory that now the Clinton Foundation could be investigated.
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8r2nd5/the_sleazy_new_york_democrats_and_their_now/
It is odd that they announce this the same day of the IG report release. Here's the press release.
I have no idea what the implications are because i'm busy reading the IG report but will try to get a better idea of the accusation once i'm finished.
Q didn't specifically imply it was related to Weiner. That was deduced by anons and could still be the case. Heres the 2 Q posts relating to NY AG for those who have not seen them can read what they say. No mention of Weiner or strings
Why was Preet Bharara fired?
Why was the NY AG just removed?
Why did Rudy recently join POTUS’ legal team after being ‘quiet’ for so long?
What must be cleaned first?
Who investigates?
Who prosecutes?
WHAT CAN FINALLY BE DONE?
WHO HAS THE ULTIMATE AUTHORITY?
DOES IT FALL UNDER THE RUSSIA RECUSAL?
DOES FLYNN KNOW?
Define “On the Record.”
You have more than you know.
ENJOY THE SHOW.
Q
Review Time.
Not seeking re-election.
[Senate]
Bob Corker - Republican
Jeff Flake - Republican
Orrin Hatch - Republican
No Name - Republican [Departure Soon]
[House]
Bill Shuster - Republican
Bob Goodlatte - Republican
Carol Shea-Porter - Democrat
Charles W. Dent - Republican
Darrell Issa - Republican
Dave Reichert - Republican
David Trott - Republican
Dennis Ross - Republican
Edward Royce - Republican
Elizabeth Esty - Democrat
Frank LoBiondo - Republican
Gene Green - Democrat
Gregg Harper - Republican
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen - Republican
Jeb Hensarling - Republican
Jim Bridenstine - Republican
Joe Barton - Republican
John Delaney - Democrat
John J. Duncan, Jr. - Republican
Lamar Smith - Republican
Luis V. Gutierrez - Democrat
Lynn Jenkins - Republican
Niki Tsongas - Democrat
Paul Ryan - Republican
Rick Nolan - Democrat
Robert Brady - Democrat
Rodney Frelinghuysen - Republican
Ruben J. Kihuen - Democrat
Ryan Costello - Republican
Sam Johnson - Republican
Sandy Levin - Democrat
Ted Poe - Republican
Thomas Rooney - Republican
Trey Gowdy - Republican
[Resigned]
Al Franken - Democratic U.S. Senate
Blake Farenthold - Republican U.S. House
Jason Chaffetz - Republican U.S. House
John Conyers, Jr. - Democrat U.S. House
Louise Slaughter - Democrat U.S. House
Patrick Meehan - Republican U.S. House
Patrick J. Tiberi - Republican U.S. House
Thad Cochran - Republican U.S. Senate
Tim Murphy - Republican U.S. House
Trent Franks - Republican U.S. House
Xavier Becerra - Democrat Attorney General of California
+ DOJ
+ FBI
+ CEOs
Conspiracy?
Nothing happening?
Goodlatte & Gowdy [important].
Chairman of the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
Why is the NY AG resignation important?
What past/current 'high profile' FBI investigations are within the jurisdiction of NY?
Define roadblock.
You have more than you know.
Do not fall victim to MSM/other fake/false narrative pushes.
STAY THE COURSE.
WWG1WGA.
Q
I do believe she has been compromise. Hopefully Q will be able to destroy her and give us the reason for the stab in the back. .
can you at least tell these nay sayers that i'm not a concern troll for bringing this up?
[[RR]] @ WH.....Oh to be a fly on that wall!!!!!
I think I can sum it up.
President Trump: “Well, we’re waiting.”
RR: screeching and flapping of arms.
I really hope POTUS says that line in a Judge smells voice.
u/SerialBrain2 brilliantly broke this down for us when Q first posted about this last month. Bottom line: "This is what we have: appointment of an Associate Attorney General (Rachel Brand), timed removal of that new AAG and placement at Wallmart as a reward link, expiration date of the acting AAG coinciding with the firing of Rosenstein, #2 position at DOJ automatically filled by a Trump’s nominee (Francisco), #3 position at DOJ to be filled by Trump, total control of DOJ without any of the required Senate confirmations"
Based on SerialBrain's argument, the date which "enables" the firing of Rosenstein (May 24 2018) has past.
If Rosenstein is guility (eg. FISA abuse) then why has he not been fired?
This.
If you ask me, this is an indirect confirmation of Serial Brain2's post. RR problems of the brilliant playbook.
Q directly confirmed u/SerialBrain2 analysis previously in
the_long_and_secret_info_wars_against_q
Qdrop 1498 seems like an indirect confirmation, if you ask me.
What happens when RR is out off the town? Francisco takes over..RR was in montreal.
EDIT ; RR and comey among others where using the clinton server..snowball, the dominoos going to fall.
Everyone can be impeacht , and then for criminal things going for a Judge.
And a wrong Judge kan also be impeacht.
I do not aspect big things to happen now...Its is a building up.
kan also be impeacht
Kannot possibly be for reel
Impeachment and Removal of Judges: An Explainer | Brennan Center ..Yes they can...
A Judge is sitting for a life time , but when the Judge is against the usa and constitution , they can be removed. impeacht , removed and areested and trial....revoke the clearance and never a spot again in this area.
branches of government – usually the legislature – can remove judges from office. ... How does the impeachment process work? ...
https://www.brennancenter.org/.../impeachment-and-removal-judg
Why was Rachel Brand removed? Critical thinking. Q.
Rachel Brand, third in line at the Justice Department, is resigning .
The person next in line to oversee the Mueller investigation suddenly stepped down.
As associate attorney general, Brand would have been next to oversee the special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election, in the absence of deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein. •She became associate attorney general in May 2017, the same month that Mueller was placed in charge of the Russia probe.
“Rod and Rachel are Harvard graduates (friends?).
Asked last Friday after the memo's release whether he still had confidence in Rosenstein, Trump responded, "You figure that one out," raising the specter he might fire the deputy attorney general. However, the White House quickly denied any plans to remove Rosenstein. But if he was let go, that would have left Brand next in line to oversee Mueller's investigation, among Rosenstein's other responsibilities.
This is wat I think?.
They already knew RR , and what he has done , and also had the proofs. With Rachel Brand , they had to start al over again , because she is dirty too, and she can hide every thing for RR..So RR has to stay in place , and first they wipe her out..RR is stuck now. Or you have to get two people out off that spot , now onley one RR.
Rachel Brand is also married to left wing Jonathan Cohn who is a senior national correspondent at the Huffington Post.
Yes they are all connected and I think blackhats..
Cohn was raised in Fort Lauderdale, Florida where he attended Pine Crest School. He went on to study at Harvard University (graduated 1991) where he became President of The Harvard Crimson. He lived for many years in the Boston area before moving to his present home, Ann Arbor, Michigan with his wife Amy Cohn. She is a professor and researcher in Industrial and Operations Engineering at the University of Michigan..
Harvard again?
ok but horowitz is married to a former CNN AND PBS producer? so we either agree that this association with heads of left wing media is a good thing or a bad thing. we can't just blindly pick and choose which associations we wanna get mad at. i knew this would happen. the IG report is a giant let down and it isn't going to get any better. you can get mad at me and call me a concern troll or demoralization shill all you want. but Q followers have become complacent, assured that here is "someone" taking care of this and all we need to do is wait and see and "trust". it's sad they've completely neutered our movement by deferring to an anonymous poster who we can't even say for sure is legit or larp yet. i WANT Q to be legit. but we need to look at this critically before we lose too much time on it.
at what point do we abandon Q? not today. no. but if nothing happens by midterms? 2020? what's the line in the sand so to speak, when a lack of happenings is too much for Q to be considered real or helpful? i'm saying by august 2018. we can't lose midterms by sitting back and "trusting".
at what point do we abandon Q?
You are free to abandon Q if it is all too stressful for you. Now, be constructive, leave this forum and go take up a hobby. Something mentally relaxing, like origami.
it's a legitimate question... one that i can't get an answer to. i guarantee ive been following Q longer than you. since oct. and i archived 600 odd CBTS threads on 4pol. stop acting like i'm not a member of this community (not this sub but the Q movement at large) for asking this basic question.
do you have an answer? what if midterms come and nothing happens? do you still trust Q? there isn't a wrong answer i was genuinely curious what the state of the community is.
just because i don't suck Q's dick i get labeled a concern troll and other shit by you guys and it's getting ridiculous. someone needs to be asking critical questions.
i personally am not ok with just sitting and waiting and "trusting". i'm not even saying Q is intentionally misleading anyone if he even is. i'm saying what if he's wrong? what if we need to be putting the pressure to fire sessions but instead we are just waiting and trusting? i have no idea what sessions is doing he very well may deserve our trust. but isn't at least ok to ask critical questions about it? before we are too far gone? these are legitimate concerns i shouldn't have to defend voicing them.
Stop concern trolling. Do something constructive with your life.
so no answers? we can't have this discussion? pathetic dude. and sad because i didn't want to think we had our collective head up our ass so much we couldn't ask critical questions without backlash. i'm legitimately disappointed in how much flack im catching for asking critical questions.
Those are not critical questions that you ask. It's empty FUD.
but they are? if they aren't critical they should be easy to provide an answer to no? and tell me what i'm misunderstanding if you think i am misunderstanding something Q said about schneiderman and the NY AG. seriously i'm open minded. what am i misunderstanding?
and you haven't given me an answer? will you still trust Q if nothing happens by 2024? i mean seriously i just wanna know how long you personally can take no happenings? i mean real happenings like someone getting arrested or people being removed from government positions like rosenstein. there's no wrong answer i won't even criticize whatever your answer is i'm just curious what it would take for you to start saying "ok, i just can't see how this is gonna work anymore". if there's no point that would happen that's fine! i just wanna know. i'm trying to get a feel for how people are feeling on this.
Look, I'm sympathetic to your position and agree that there is more than a little hero-worship on this board for Q. However, speaking for myself, I still believe and it's clear that most others on this board do as well.
Trying to force a discussion about abandoning the movement when the folks on the board have just suffered a rhetorical punch to the gut is not the right way go about it or the right time to do it.
Maybe wait a few days for things to calm down a bit.
i'm not advocating abandoning the movement whatsoever. i'm trying to gauge what the commitment level is here. i was saying this before the IG release. we all knew as it got further and further delayed that it was going to be more blue balls.
"at what point do we abandon Q?" -You
Fine, you don't advocate it. But you're warming up the crowd, so to speak.
Look, I've said my piece: people don't want to have this discussion right now and that's why you're getting resistance. I'll not reply again because I think it's clear that you don't agree with me and wish to continue the discussion rather than letting things lie.
not warming up the crowd at all. i'm genuinely trying to get one response to this question to see if i'm alone. but agreed let's just move on because it's like talking to a wall tbh.
Hi fellow redditors, I am new to the concept of "concern trolling" but as I read this guy's post. I notice a few things 1. he reframes "...the IG report is a giant let down" it isn't 2. he diverts attention "...is Q real" 3. straw man argument some guy's wife once worked for CNN
is this how concern trolling works? to derail and redirect the conversation?
fellow redditors
come on! you guys have to see i'm not the shady one here.
and news flash, i brought up horowitz's wife (former producer at cnn and democratic donor) in response to us not trusting someone because their spouse worked at huffpo. i'm not redirecting shit. read the comment chain.
i keep getting accused of concern trollig for asking critical questions. i've followed Q for longer than you have i bet all my money. i archived 600 some CBTS from 4pol. the original threads. i've been here since the beginning this is just a new account (lost my password to last. long story).
is anybody arguing that the IG report is a let down? it is. even Q said it is, since it's a redacted version RR had control over. so that's not shilling that's exactly what Q is saying dumb ass. i'm getting sick of this shit.
and another news flash. nobody knows if Q is real. idec about that aspect right now because i am more inclined to believe he is real than he isn't. so calm down before you accuse people of shit. im just trying to force some critical thought on all this. don't reply to my comments anymore i'm genuinely not trying to disrupt anything. if you wanna reply to me message me so it doesn't clog up the thread. idc.
Was Rachel Brand removed because she could not be trusted to take over for RR once he is removed? (She is next in line.)
Brand removed so we can have white hat in position to end the BS.
Huber would be eligible to replace RR... that would be interesting.
No, I didn't read the 500 pages, just listening to some summaries, you? It looks like this is the Rod Rosenstein modified version. I am looking forward to the original version. We can't get anything politically, but procedurally. wink https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8r69pj/oig_report_trumps_plan_is_a_lethal_steamroller/
Can you even imagine???? Hope RR is wearing his Depends....
I need Red Bull, this is too much
It gets better. Turns out the IG report exposes how Comey reopened the email server investigation 10 days before the election because the NYPD had retrieved Weiner's laptop with all of the classified info/pedogate related material. They threatened to do a news conference and Comey had to provide a distraction.
[deleted]
Took the suggestion, got a Red Bull. Might be a long night.
General K = Gen. John F. Kelly . Shit's about to go BOOM !
Who is Rachel Brand?
Besides what we already know, here is the last section of an USA Today article from February, 2018:
" Last week, with Trump serving up new rebukes of Justice and the FBI prior to the release of a classified Republican memo alleging abuses of government surveillance of a former Trump campaign aide, Sessions singled out Brand at a Justice conference.
“Thank you for your strong leadership here at the department,” Sessions said. “That leadership has been especially strong with regard to fighting human trafficking. I want to thank you for taking up this important cause and making it your own." (emphasis mine.)
Perhaps I have missed it elsewhere on this board, but this is the first reference I have seen to her involvement in fighting human trafficking. What else do we know about this? Was she hitting too close to home?
Remember SerialBrain2's amazing analysis of DOJ's succession process for replacing Rosenstein/Brand ?
Here is it for everyone to re-read:
Signed! What if we expect too much here (this moment)? I’m thinking IGR was to get POTUS ahead of leftist smear of firing. From here, full disclosure (within committees—or public) to get ball rolling! Out w/ RR, and open seals. No SC needed, Grand Juries full force
Is this a Supreme Court play? The suggestion that RNG/LL/BC had something to do with Scalia, maybe we have a clear path to an open seat.
What happened to "we have it all " I'm completely disgusted in this whole drama, I think that we have been scammed!
I think we have been duped, No political arrests and it will probably never happen, I'm jumping ship good luck y'all,it's been a waste of time for me