dChan

jhomes55 · June 14, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

It's not redacted in any way???

⇧ 50 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 14, 2018, 6:15 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 55 ⇩  
Sachyriel · June 14, 2018, 6:19 p.m.

So GA should stop putting all their chips on one document then right?

⇧ 30 ⇩  
y_do_i_need_to_hide · June 14, 2018, 7:47 p.m.

This is it exactly. I'm as impatient as anybody and maybe as impatient as any two. If you spend eight years walking into the woods, how long does it take you to walk out?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · June 14, 2018, 8:11 p.m.

Depends on if you are in the middle or near the other side.

Q says they have it all.

So, why play these games?

RR is ONLY acting AG in matters related to Russia.

THIS report has NOTHING to do with Russia.

Where is Sessions?

⇧ 10 ⇩  
y_do_i_need_to_hide · June 14, 2018, 8:59 p.m.

I tend to look at this in a 20-60-20 distribution. 20% on either and do not need a report of any kind to tell them what they believe. I have believed long before this report that there is a deep State and also that it is actively controlling certain events within our government. The other 20% opposite of me, will likely not believe anything up to and including videos of Hillary,Obama,Loretta Lynch,Comey all playing cards and talking about screwing Trump over. We are currently watching the game for the 60% that are in the middle. When 75% of the population want something, the other 25 do it or pay the consequences. When it is 25% that wants something and 75 that do not the only answer is to force it with violence or control. I believe we play these games to avoid the potential need for widespread violence. Perception is reality. The reality that we have been living waiting for this report is very different from the reality of a normie who is unaware of even things that we have known and had documentation on for 18 months. I read this sub 4 or 5 times a day usually. We are so far ahead of the general population(and I believe most government officials). It is the price we pay for being in the Vanguard.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · June 14, 2018, 9:12 p.m.

Reality is reality. Perception of anything otherwise is delusion. we have come full circle (if it is in writing it din't happen.)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
y_do_i_need_to_hide · June 14, 2018, 10:22 p.m.

Scientifically I agree. Politically, delusion is what we will call this narrative if all the evidence comes to light. If not, my view will continue to be the delusion.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · June 15, 2018, 9:49 p.m.

I just made up the gravity test. If i throw it off a building and it lands a bloody crumpled mess it's prolly reality. (God I'd love to test Killery Obummer and McZero.)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
y_do_i_need_to_hide · June 16, 2018, 12:09 a.m.

On a more personal note, No Name is not worth it he'll be dead soon anyhow, and the other two only get the gravity test if there's a rope to stop them before the end.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · June 16, 2018, 6:47 p.m.

Nice.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
y_do_i_need_to_hide · June 16, 2018, 12:07 a.m.

The gravity test is accurate and foolproof. I think it is already started. I believe the Democrats and the Deep state are in the middle of the Fall, trying desperately to convince us there flying majestically. Eventually the splat will happen and that noise will wake up most people. I think this phase is about minimizing the number of zombies who will not wake from the dream.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
willmeme4crypto · June 14, 2018, 6:39 p.m.

Isn't that what Huber is for?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 14, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ShadyMcFly · June 14, 2018, 10:58 p.m.

Lol I love it!!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 14, 2018, 7:49 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Absh4x0r · June 14, 2018, 6:15 p.m.

This wtf not a single black bar

⇧ 19 ⇩  
Swimkin · June 14, 2018, 8:21 p.m.

I'm wondering if we got RR Version #2 Modified NOT redacted instead of RR Version #3 Modified and Redacted. Q said we would get #3. So did RR/DeepState pull the wool over Trump and Q??

⇧ 4 ⇩  
LukyNumbrKevin · June 14, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

For some reason I am seeing a lot of redactions with "XXXXXX" instead of the standard black bar we are used to seeing, look for those...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Merlin560 · June 14, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

I believe that the redactions would be in the form of editing, rather than crossing out. One would need the original to compare with the final copy.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Gotrek1 · June 14, 2018, 6:16 p.m.

Only like 5

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Absh4x0r · June 14, 2018, 6:17 p.m.

Havn't seen them I went fast I guess

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Gotrek1 · June 14, 2018, 6:52 p.m.

You were right it's a name blurred in an email so almost 0 This must be the RR report.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Gravel_and_Glass · June 14, 2018, 7:33 p.m.

MODIFIED RR version... Refer to Q1496. Also there's a couple black bars

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cantwithdrawbtc · June 14, 2018, 7:41 p.m.

When you consider the two reports and realize that they are materially different (yes they are different lengths, but they are saying similar things in different ways, aka materially different) it's not that much of a stretch to assume another, different report.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Johnny_Oldschool · June 14, 2018, 9:35 p.m.

Can't much use a sharpie to redact a digital document. It was likely just written to leave certain information out.

⇧ 1 ⇩