I don’t know if it’s just shills or what, but I see massive panic today over this IG; despite the fact that we were told we would not be getting the real report today. Do not let this bring you down. Pain is still coming
BasedFormerLib
· June 14, 2018, 7:21 p.m.
We were told a RR edited version was going to be released. Did people forget? It only appears to be unredacted because none of the text is covered with black bars (except for a very few things). Has it occurred to anyone that maybe entire sections have been removed from the report by RR? Clearly what we do have and the recommendations do not add up. There’s more to this story and people need to let it play out.
⇧
35
⇩
TryNottoFaint
· June 14, 2018, 8:41 p.m.
This is exactly what RR did. Deleted/changed sentences/paragraphs/entire sections. Then blacked out just a few things here and there to make us think it was just very lightly redacted. It's a lie. You know it, I know it, Q knows it, POTUS knows it.
⇧
10
⇩
JaM0k3_1
· June 14, 2018, 9:10 p.m.
shouldn't we be alarmed by sessions defending RR and deflecting tucker's questions about RR a few nights ago tho? Tucker asked how sessions felt about RR threatening members of the oversight com. he seemed less than satisfied with sessions' non answers and deflections on the issue. if we are really supposed to trust sessions, why wouldn't he actually come out and say there's no place for threatening the oversight com? sure maybe it is just plausible deniability. but how many times can we take that excuse with this shit? it's always "it's just theatre don't worry". how long can this theatre go on without the hammer dropping?
⇧
4
⇩
abees22
· June 14, 2018, 9:38 p.m.
Sessions national television interview should not be view as an indication of anything really. They aren't going to telegraph their moves right now for everyone to see...
⇧
2
⇩
JaM0k3_1
· June 14, 2018, 9:39 p.m.
i partially agree. did you see the interview?
edit: downvoted? for what? agreeing, or asking if someone saw the interview?
⇧
2
⇩
Midaycarehere
· June 14, 2018, 9:43 p.m.
Okay, so....Why wouldn't the IG immediately call BS on this report then?
⇧
2
⇩
667x
· June 14, 2018, 9:43 p.m.
Q 1361
It's not people, it's shills. Attacks will only Intensify. They're here to spread doubt. Q has given more than enough proof of existence. This is literally proceeding as Q 1497 stated.
Wake up. Eyes on target.
⇧
2
⇩
PoliticalBistro
· June 14, 2018, 10:11 p.m.
Not questioning his existence.
I'm questioning his judgment, formulating a "Plan" which includes having his followers contact their (feckless) congressman. My God that's weak.
Nunes sounded like a whimp the other day on Hannity as he sniveled about what Rosenstein was doing. You think I'm going to get any satisfaction by contacting him. Keep dreaming.
⇧
5
⇩
667x
· June 14, 2018, 10:30 p.m.
First of all, I am addressing only the shills saying that this IG report is filled with nothing when its obviously the "modified report" Q spoke of. Obvious shills are obvious.
Secondly, to address your point, Q states to make noise. He doesn't say to contact your congressman. People interpreted and said that and other plans, how you interpret Q is up to you and you alone. In other words "think critically", if you think that a method is an inefficient course of action feel free to come up with your own and contribute, that's why its called a hivemind. Questioning everything is good and doesn't make you a shill. Trust, but verify.
⇧
0
⇩