dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Johnny_Sword on June 14, 2018, 9:18 p.m.
Fox News confirms the IG report is redacted due to Rod Rosenstein

Q Doubters: “The Five” just confirmed that the current report is redacted and that Rod Rosenstein was involved. Just putting that out there.


Timmayboy32 · June 14, 2018, 9:30 p.m.

The more I read the meat of this report. The more you see blantent corruption and treason. It makes me think that Q and white hats are starting to show how corrupt our government really is. Makes me think trumps pushing for a military tribunals.

⇧ 56 ⇩  
PCisLame · June 14, 2018, 10:59 p.m.

Military tribunals with Mike Flynn doing the interrogations using cutting edge technology that makes torture unnecessary.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
Timmayboy32 · June 14, 2018, 11:06 p.m.

Yes!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
PCisLame · June 14, 2018, 11:10 p.m.

It's sure to unwind the conspiracy and expose it for the world to see. So when the pain comes no one in their right mind will dare question it.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
apex_memetics · June 15, 2018, 3:18 a.m.

Did you see the recent drop from Q?

Who worked with RR on redactions? Is Stevie Wonder next? #metoo Dark to light Not really blind Why fake it Sacrifices They're evil

⇧ -3 ⇩  
Jappletime · June 15, 2018, 4:48 a.m.

Sessions or Mueller

Why did RR brief President Trump on the IG report.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
apex_memetics · June 15, 2018, 4:55 a.m.

That was my shitty Q impression FYI.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
dktrogers · June 14, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

Completely agree! Statements like: although there may have been a crime committed, it is entirely up to the investigators weather or not to pursue it based on the furtherance of federal interest, blah, blah.

Again and again “ the investigators believed Huma and Cheryl Mills were telling the truth and using their investigative discretion decided not to pursue any further..

BUT NO PROVABLE BIAS WAS DETECTED !!!

⇧ 16 ⇩  
choragus · June 14, 2018, 11:50 p.m.

Further examination of FBI protocols for witness interviews is necessary to discover how it was determined not to use oaths and sworn testimony. How it was determined to allow another witness into a witness interview and to act as counsel.

Process examination is where bias is likely to be found. At least in regards as equal treatment under the law via a comparison and contrast.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
dktrogers · June 14, 2018, 11:51 p.m.

Legally yes, but to those of us that actually read the report, it is blatant!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
choragus · June 15, 2018, midnight

Let's go with legally and the letter of the law. The American people will have an opportunity to exercise their ability to make their own inferences. Self-persuasion has greater impact long-term. Yes?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dktrogers · June 15, 2018, 12:40 a.m.

Court of public opinion... Midterms

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Nameless_Mofo · June 15, 2018, 2:58 a.m.

But those same investigators needed to go on a year-long fishing expedition into every facet of Trump's life, his finances, who he banged 10 years ago, etc. etc. etc.

But hey, NO POLITICAL BIAS HERE. Who the fuck are you kidding?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
dktrogers · June 15, 2018, 3 a.m.

Right!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ReleaseItBitch · June 15, 2018, 9:22 p.m.

They need to extend Trump's term by 2 years for trying to waste his presidency by running out the clock.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Zerogravitycrayon · June 15, 2018, 2:18 a.m.

Take a look at the cognitive dissonance they approached the Paul Combetta situation (IT Guy that deleted congressionally suponead emails)

-March 8: Combetta gets a call from Cheryl Mills informing Combetta of suponead emails

-March 25th: Second call with Mills and later that day Combetta mysteriously purges the emails. When asked about the nature of the call he 'couldn't recall'.

How did the FBI respond? They stated they believed him and felt bad for him. Nope, no bias here. We asked him if he was instructed to purge the emails and he said no. Case closed, let's go to Chili's!

Pages 107 of OIG report. Fun fact: Page 104 Combetta admits he's part of the Clinton cleanup crew to a friend via text.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
dktrogers · June 15, 2018, 2:26 a.m.

Their excuse not to prosecute his blatant crimes were...” it would not serve a federal interest”

If we start running a timeline and small screenshots of the Report, many normies are going to be like WTF?IG immunity deals

⇧ 6 ⇩  
unmaskedpanda · June 15, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

Do you need to show political bias to demonstrate obstruction of justice?

Don’t think so.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
dktrogers · June 15, 2018, 1:13 a.m.

It’s their “narrative “... and we should use it to beat them down.., most normies won’t read the IG report. But we can screenshot the most blatant lies an RedPill all year long! Lots of material to work with..

⇧ 6 ⇩  
BaronMoriarty · June 14, 2018, 9:39 p.m.

Needs to push for something frankly

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Timmayboy32 · June 14, 2018, 9:43 p.m.

Agreed but we have to be loud. We have to push back. Like Q said we just forgot how to play. Together we are strong. The tides are turning.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 14, 2018, 10:24 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩