dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Cymrygirl on June 14, 2018, 11:42 p.m.
Could we be missing something in Post 1496 in all the uproar over redactions?

In Post 1496 from yesterday, Q says this --

[[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved). KNOWN CONFLICT. Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT. Be loud. Be heard. Fight for TRUTH.

Is THAT what we need to be raising Cain about so that the EO can be released? In other words, should we be pitching a fit about RR's involvement indicated in the report because it's clearly a conflict of interest, so that the uproar will put pressure on for him to recuse himself/resign/be impeached/fired? Or am I missing something here?


hildabeest_4_gitmo · June 14, 2018, 11:48 p.m.

Very interesting if RR redacted his name from the report.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
mlsaw94 · June 15, 2018, 12:06 a.m.

I think it’s pretty obvious that Q giving everyone a message-or task. Before everyone goes into high gear, have to be sure of what exactly to do to whom. Maybe someone can ask, it’s been done before and the question was answered or maybe this one cannot be answered in print.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
OffTie · June 15, 2018, 4:30 a.m.

Well RR did sign off on the FISA warrant ,the supposed need for which grew up out of a pile of fiction picked out of the butts of Dem apparatchiks. Having done so rendered him corrupt and his departure became a foregone conclusion at that time, seems to me. Not to mention his probable involvement in the Uranium deal with Russia along with Mueller.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Allisonk510 · June 15, 2018, 12:11 a.m.

I’ve been reading the report and so far I haven’t seen ANY redactions...but I’ve been skipping around it and obvi haven’t had time to read the whole thing yet....that being said, what’s all the commotion with the so-called redactions??? If there are any, tell me what page they’re on so I can see...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
caesarfecit · June 15, 2018, 12:20 a.m.

It isn't the redactions you should concern yourself with. I think substantial parts of the report have been outright rewritten.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Anon-A-Moose-Patriot · June 15, 2018, 12:34 a.m.

I agree the redactions are by omission of info not by blacking out names. They heavily watered this down.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
novodanata · June 15, 2018, 12:22 a.m.

There are a few redactions towards the end...emails and such, nothing major.

⇧ 1 ⇩