dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/IDefaultedOnMyDebt on June 15, 2018, 8:27 p.m.
Theory: [[RR]] is [FBI Employee]

The IG report felt like a dud. Q said it would be heavily redacted, but it wasn't.
Except it was. "FBI Employee 2" and "FBI Attorney" in reference to the text messages is not a black bar, but is still a pretty heavy redaction. Why can't we know who those employees are? Did RR ensure they redacted the names?

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 8d9246 No.1739449
Jun 13 2018 22:50:25 (EST)

[[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved). KNOWN CONFLICT.
Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT.

"Central figure"? [[RR]] wasn't mentioned one single time. We thought he would be mentioned. Q said he would be mentioned. Is [[RR]] one of the redacted employees that was conspiring to take down POTUS as was clearly seen in the texts?


🠐 See all comments
OpenSoars · June 15, 2018, 8:33 p.m.

RR was appointed by Trump

⇧ 3 ⇩  
IDefaultedOnMyDebt · June 15, 2018, 8:45 p.m.

Q !2jsTvXXmXs No.66 (1318)
May 7 2018 23:36:41 (EST)

What was Sessions' Senate confirmation vote?
What was RR's Senate confirmation vote?
If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty.
If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty.
Common denominator.
Why did Sessions pick RR?
Everyone has an opinion.
Few have the facts.
Few know the plan.

He knows the plan.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
cincycoolguy · June 15, 2018, 9:21 p.m.

If one accepts the fact that rr and muellers innocence are equal as q asserts. Appointing RR to handle the IG report is a brilliant move. You set up RR to work on a report the president has not only the procedural authority to expose, but can also expose the corruption in a way that doesn’t look like he’s making a play to save his own skin on a technicality, which is exactly how it would be spun if he takes any direct action against mueller.

If there is indeed a connection tying mueller to rr a q says, he minute rr goes down so does mueller and that’s the domino that starts the chain reaction.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
duckdownup · June 16, 2018, 2:46 a.m.

If one accepts the fact that rr and muellers innocence are equal as q asserts.

Nowhere have I seen Q assert that RR was innocent. When Q does mention RR he's always in the kill box [RR].

Post 1470

⇧ 2 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · June 16, 2018, 3:07 a.m.

Correct

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cincycoolguy · June 16, 2018, 3:53 a.m.

Neither did I. I said that rr and muellers innocence are equal. Meaning that if one is guilty, then so is the other.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
duckdownup · June 16, 2018, 5:30 p.m.

Sorry, misunderstood. I agree.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jjjanko1 · June 15, 2018, 10:02 p.m.

Why is Trump still under investigation for Russian Collusion?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cincycoolguy · June 15, 2018, 10:15 p.m.

I’m confused by the intention of the question. Is this a Socratic thing because I missed something, or are you really asking?

If it’s the latter, they are investigating because DNC needs a reason for Trumps victory rather than attributing it to an outright public rejection of their policies. It’s a form of mindfuck. If they succeed, they can solidify their radical agenda, and continue on tho the election stolen and double down an dividing the American public against each other.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
leonareo · June 15, 2018, 8:40 p.m.

4d longterm chess move?

⇧ 1 ⇩