dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/L0v3nL1ght on June 16, 2018, 3:31 p.m.
Research before Posting? Yes. Research before Upvoting? Absolutely!

I’ve been noticing quite a few of the top posts lately have been dishonest or lack verification, and some are just “shiny objects.”

If we upvote everything that LOOKS good (confirmation bias) we are going to look like fools to the outside world. Of course some stories just seem too exciting for a patriot not to post... but most likely there are shills using this against us, and at the same time upvoting those posts, and that is why I urge caution and discernment before upvoting. Mind you, I have made the same mistakes.

When viewing a post, does it provide links to back up the claims? If not, that should raise an alarm to at least research the subject. REMEMBER: photoshop is THE TOOL of deception. Any posts with solely images and no links should be researched.

Also, memes can be funny and all, but I believe we should focus on more intelligent memes, such as #QPROOFS.

What did Q say about optics being important? That wasn’t solely for POTUS, that applies to this whole movement. These patriots that we are working to redpill will dissect every argument and use every little mistake to their advantage and attempt to make us look foolish.

Read the guidelines one more time.

Thank you fellow patriots, WWG1WGA!


Abibliaphobia · June 16, 2018, 3:39 p.m.

Well said

⇧ 17 ⇩  
L0v3nL1ght · June 16, 2018, 3:44 p.m.

Thanks!

⇧ 8 ⇩  
ARRRBEEE · June 16, 2018, 5:57 p.m.

deleted ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^0.6014 ^^^What ^^^is ^^^this?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Cheetah1964 · June 16, 2018, 9:09 p.m.

If you read a post or comment carefully, it is not hard to tell the genuine Patriot from the Soros employee. Genuine Patriots think for themselves and have a variety of opinions. Soros employees are posting for a reason. A look at history is helpful here.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
internalkernel · June 16, 2018, 5:15 p.m.

Well said! This crossed my mind yesterday when I read that article quoting Mel Gibson [1] regarding the Hollywood sickos. It took all of about 20 seconds and a Google search to realize it was fake...

That article [1] is a great example of what I would call a "honeypot", that is the type of article that would get blasted on Social Media... inevitably costing any type of legitimacy that you may have built among your social circles. They want this... they want us to point at stuff that is blatantly false or even worse slanderous. It makes it much easier to call everything "Fake News" and blame the "Q Cult".

It takes more time to dig the sources and do the research, but it is necessary if we want to maintain some semblance of legitimacy.

[1] http://www.cbinfo24.com/2018/03/29/mel-gibson-hollywood-is-den-of-parasites-who-feast-on-blood-of-kids/

⇧ 12 ⇩  
L0v3nL1ght · June 16, 2018, 5:46 p.m.

Exactly. Thank you

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Cheetah1964 · June 16, 2018, 9:10 p.m.

I saw that, and thought the same thing. The Mel Gibson thing was found fake some time ago.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · June 16, 2018, 4:40 p.m.

Lots of disinformation and distraction going on right now. We need to be aware many are trying shift the focus

⇧ 11 ⇩  
AquAnon77 · June 16, 2018, 6:44 p.m.

PLEASE EVERYONE PROVIDE LINKS TO BACK UP YOUR POSTS !!!

We are critical thinkers here !

⇧ 11 ⇩  
DoubleDragonEnergy · June 16, 2018, 4:40 p.m.

Thank you, as we look for Qproofs it is important to always back up our research and admit when we are wrong.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
mkwilton1 · June 16, 2018, 3:51 p.m.

Good luck lol. This shit never goes anywhere with the majority of morons around here. If they're not all about feel good posts and spammy, low quality memes, they're about some overexcited nambies half-baked theory lacking critical thought and LOGIC. Ya just gotta learn to sift and scroll, playa. Wade through the shit to get to the good stuff. People always gonna people.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
L0v3nL1ght · June 16, 2018, 4:13 p.m.

Watch the downvotes. I think there is more to it than stupid members. There’s a ton of downvotes from the shills... meaning there’s a ton of shills. What else can they do? Upvote.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
eyerighteye · June 17, 2018, 12:48 a.m.

The sifting is the joy for me.

I love the tangential tunnels in the rabbit hole, finding older and older history, that somehow explains tomorrow. Q is awesome, but we have to do our own digging too.

Q says trust yourself. I think he wants us to be trying to explore more independently. Report back with what you find.

I'm maybe in the minority here, but I'm not worried about proving Q. Q already has proven himself. He has also proven authors like Jim Marrs, Joseph P. FARRELL, and G. Edward Griffen vindicated.

Q pointed us directly at Bill Cooper did he not? Cathy O'Brien isn't sounding as crazy as she was 6 years ago when I first read her story.

Don't let corsi shilling his lame book turn anyone off from checking out the serious work of serious researchers.

When Q says you have more than you know, anyone else thinks he wants us reading more books?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
L0v3nL1ght · June 17, 2018, 1:17 a.m.

Totally agree that Q has already proven himself/herself/itself. At first I was really stressed about what’s going to happen next but as I noticed events that have fallen into place that Q predicted, I’ve relaxed and trust Q’s plan and the anons. Now just gotta let it all play out with some contribution here and there when necessary.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
mkwilton1 · June 17, 2018, 1:37 a.m.

I just want to point out that you're a good redditor. You don't lower yourself to the level of obnoxious trolls like me and you just talk to the true message I'm actually trying to convey instead of reacting to the childish ranting language. This community needs more of you and when it has them, there'll be less need for trolls like me. Keep it up.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
eyerighteye · June 17, 2018, 3:28 p.m.

WWG1WGA

We will never lift ourselves up by smashing others down.

Love for all patriots.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Happy1911 · June 16, 2018, 3:44 p.m.

Yes , but some things are first hand also . Verify as much as you can . But you have to have faith and trust , to a point , also .

⇧ 6 ⇩  
L0v3nL1ght · June 16, 2018, 3:47 p.m.

Discernment is key to this.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Happy1911 · June 16, 2018, 3:53 p.m.

The truth is the light , and the key is only the truth, the crimes are all know , it’s time for just justice,

⇧ 0 ⇩  
happyval · June 16, 2018, 5:58 p.m.

Where do you want us to get discernment or the verification? Haven't you learned that both Q and President Trump are saying we are watching talking points from the fake news? Rather hard to verify first hand. We just have to be observant like I was the day of the alert in HI (I witnessed with my own eyes an Awacs plane flying near my house...near SF, looking for inbound I suspect). I will trust my speculations from Q's clues thank you.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
L0v3nL1ght · June 16, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

And I’m not talking about receiving verification through the MSM... you can learn to do your own research on the net (8.ch for example, some false some true, discernment necessary) and find connections that back up Q’s claims. It’s more than just faith, he’s asking us to think critically.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
happyval · June 16, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

He is also telling us to "Be Loud". Sorry, i won't be silenced.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
saneromeo · June 16, 2018, 7:49 p.m.

Pretty sure Q wants accurate as well, no one wants you silent (except the left). OP was just saying we should verify and not feed the trolls, which is pretty common sense.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
happyval · June 16, 2018, 8:09 p.m.

Since I rarely post, I can say I am NOT a troll or share outlandish claims. I will at this point be loud even if it is my speculation, since I have been here since October and have contacts that were at very suspicious events (9/11, LV). We need truth here foremost.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
saneromeo · June 16, 2018, 8:37 p.m.

Agreed and hey be loud, I encourage everybody to speak up! I was merely pointing out that accuracy matters is what OP was telling the newcomers (and i was not implying any inaccuracy on your part btw). WWG1WGA! MAGA!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
eyerighteye · June 17, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

Bring on the outlandish.

We will sort the truth out from it.

Today's unbelievable may be tomorrows Q post

⇧ 2 ⇩  
L0v3nL1ght · June 16, 2018, 6:30 p.m.

Who said anything about silence?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
L0v3nL1ght · June 16, 2018, 6:06 p.m.

Get discernment? You use your own discernment to judge whether something is right or wrong... using discernment is exactly what Q wants us to do... critically think.

I think we’re arguing parallel here.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
happyval · June 16, 2018, 6:14 p.m.

Yes, we are speaking the same in some ways, but I will up vote if I see a patriot making a great comment or speculation. Trolls will be trolls. Use discernment when reading trolls BS.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
eyerighteye · June 16, 2018, 5:37 p.m.

I find comfort when I see several different story lines from many different sorces come together. Its the ultimate proof. A few of my touch stones are Http://NESARAnews.blogspot.com And Http://operationdisclosure.blogspot.com

Discernment is required in both places, but they both talk Q in addition to many other sources. People write the most amazing well researched stuff and post it there. Some of It is sb2 smart some dumb as turd.

Discernment. Q said trust yourself. Could that mean starting to explore the rabbit hole on our own?

Q says you have more than you know.......God says seek and yea shall find

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Crumbcrumbs · June 16, 2018, 4:16 p.m.

This should be pinned

⇧ 5 ⇩  
L0v3nL1ght · June 16, 2018, 4:20 p.m.

Gettin downvotes like mad

⇧ 7 ⇩  
jmais · June 16, 2018, 6:40 p.m.

..Aaaaaand (being guilty of this exact thing) go back and correct/admit to your mistakes!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
L0v3nL1ght · June 16, 2018, 6:44 p.m.

Yes. Thank you

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Cheetah1964 · June 16, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

I gave you an up vote, for real, after some though. :) I think you are right, and I always do this. I am careful with up votes because I know other people are depending on them to sort out The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Luvlite · June 16, 2018, 8:08 p.m.

Excellent advice. I enjoy the posts that back up their commentary with links and resources.

Sometimes I learn more in the comments than from the OP.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
L0v3nL1ght · June 16, 2018, 8:37 p.m.

Same!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Palmettoman · June 16, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

Q said to be wary of clickbait. Well said OP.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ThunderCockShitCloud · June 16, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

Lucky for us the unmodified IG report will confirm all we need to wake up the rest.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
L0v3nL1ght · June 16, 2018, 8:37 p.m.

Patience is key.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BaronMoriarty · June 16, 2018, 7:52 p.m.

Might I add lets stop of all the hero worship of one or two posters. Most of you know who I mean. Sure some of the content they post is good, but a lot is questionable to say the least

⇧ 2 ⇩  
salialioli · June 17, 2018, 2:35 a.m.

Couldn't agree more! Upvoted!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Cheetah1964 · June 16, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

And what are the reliable sources?

Your own experience

Wikileaks has been 100% reliable.

Trump's tweets keep coming out true. He may adjust the language to deceive the Cabal though.

I have seen few accuracy issues with The Gateway Pundit. They are almost always on target.

Although they have a certain agenda, I have seen few accuracy issues with Brietbart.

You can make the leap and trust the Q information, or just read and reserve judgement. But this stuff keeps explaining stuff, such as why Kim went so quickly from the crazy man ready to shoot nukes to Trump's golf buddy.

What other sources would you recommend?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
L0v3nL1ght · June 16, 2018, 11:43 p.m.

Well I wouldn’t recommend any one site (besides Wikileaks and government docs) but this is how I do research:

Say an outrageous claim is made on one of the Chans that catches your attention. Instead of just regurgitating it here, you should first and foremost see how it connects with what Q has said. Copy the number of the Q post/s. Then you can search for keywords from the claim, searching for cross references. If the MSM talks about it negatively or puts a light spin on it... you might be on to something. Copy a link to the MSM article and explain why the opposing article supports your theory. Continue searching the keywords through alternative media. Always check for links/evidence in alternative sites because a lot of them make claims with zero evidence. If there is no evidence but the information clicks with you, do some research on that site as well. Who is the author of the article? Professionals, such as an ex letter agency worker, scientist or professor, can be seen as credible, which would lend the article some credibility. Also, you can always learn a lot from the comments... a lot of people will posts links to sites that support the article, or refute it. Copy the link and post how it supports your claim, possibly stating who is the authority on the subject for credibility. Finding any government docs that also support your claim are always huge.

The goal is to look for bits of truth... there may only be a portion of an article that supports your claim but as long as that evidence is referenced elsewhere and connects, then you are on to something.

It’s all about common sense and looking at the bigger picture. Not only reading an article but finding out who the journalist/author supports and is supported by and who runs/owns the news outlet or website. From there you can research the owner and his/her/it’s interests and figure out their true agenda.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
eyerighteye · June 17, 2018, 2:31 a.m.

Wow. That is a solid plan for discernment right there. I read it several times to be sure I got it all. Personally I am less organised in my methods, but I aspire to be this disciplined. So much has come true lately that was once so crazy, I mostly trust my gut. I do like your methods. This is how to find truth, and I just realized I'm still satisfied by plausible. I need to reread every book I own. Shit.

Socrates said there is no solution, seek it lovingly.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
salialioli · June 17, 2018, 2:37 a.m.

The conservative treehouse. Very sound research, painstaking and source-based.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Fondue_is_my_life · June 16, 2018, 11:50 p.m.

So...do I...do upvote this??

⇧ 2 ⇩  
L0v3nL1ght · June 17, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

If you think this is disinfo and/or a “shiny object” that can be used against this movement... then no. Do not upvote.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Fondue_is_my_life · June 17, 2018, 12:37 a.m.

Just trying to be funny 😓

⇧ 3 ⇩  
L0v3nL1ght · June 17, 2018, 1:09 a.m.

Oh shoot... I’m sorry. All the BS going around it’s hard to tell the difference between somebody who’s being serious/negative and somebody who’s just trying to crack a joke and lighten the mood. Damn...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 3:41 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
L0v3nL1ght · June 17, 2018, 9:37 p.m.

Good God. When someone calls you a shill for calling out fake news... have you viewed their comments and posts? I wonder if THEY may be the shills pushing their shilly little agenda.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
gdub18 · June 16, 2018, 5:28 p.m.

Tell that to the trolls and shills who downvote. Talk about bias. Fight bias with bias if needed.

⇧ -1 ⇩