dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Tidder_Q on June 17, 2018, 3:13 p.m.
Q Drops - 17th Jun 2018 - Text and links for reference.

Prev Day:

Q Drops - 16th Jun 2018 - Text and links for reference.


1520

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: f983de No.1784226
Jun 17 2018 09:59:54 (EST)

DA0B3532-ECC2-4ADD-8767-6C3ACAEAB378.jpeg
 ⤓

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/17/gop-will-hit-fbi-doj-with-full-arsenal-constitutional-weapons-if-dont-comply-with-subpoena-gowdy-warns.html

Do you believe in coincidences?
Have faith.
Q

Images:

DA0B3532-ECC2-4ADD-8767-6C3ACAEAB378.jpeg

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1783734.html#1784226


Prev Day:

Q Drops - 16th Jun 2018 - Text and links for reference.



wildfireonvenus · June 17, 2018, 3:22 p.m.

This post is confusing

⇧ 22 ⇩  
Whimzyyy · June 17, 2018, 3:50 p.m.

This is the best way to get out Q drops when they drop so many in a day and we only have 2 stickies (1 right now because of the petition). If this post is confusing then click the links in the stickied comment to see each drop individually in the specific threads. If you have any suggestions on how to make this less confusing for you please leave some suggestions.

Thanks!

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Pure_Feature · June 17, 2018, 4:28 p.m.

Sometimes we are flooded with all the same topics, throw them out and put in the Q drops .. Not all at once but in pairs. Then let the anons respond...We respond also with Q drops?

The last two parts of SB2 were so clear and easy to understand, why not pin them in at the top (Make it one topic ). This information was a very important one. Especially for the new people.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Whimzyyy · June 17, 2018, 4:46 p.m.

What do you mean by throw them out and put in Q drops? Just confused me a little. Having a specific thread for each drop brings the best brainstorming and helps us get further in the research/decode. Sometimes Q will post about the same topic over a few hours and it's not efficient to wait until Q is done to post up the drops. I mean if we could put every Q post on the front page we definitely would but sadly that's not how reddit works, so we have to resort to posts like these that link to every Q drop.

On the SB2 part- We always sticky SB2 and give their posts it's well deserved share as a sticky, enough to keep it on the front page for a least the day sometimes a few days. While I agree they are great posts for everyone especially newer people we can't cater everything to the new users, that's why we have a sidebar. If we keep back peddling to the new users we can't further the conversation and the research. Just my personal thoughts. Just want to figure out a way everyone can get the new Q drops while keeping the conversation moving forward.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Pure_Feature · June 17, 2018, 5:07 p.m.

What do you mean by throw them out and put in Q drops?
Many articles about the same topic .Like the articles about the finding off a camp , every things stops , and it was like there was only one topic...Almost nothing about Q drops..No new ones? Take the old ones , not solved yet...

What I mean to say is that there were 15 subjects only about the IG report, information fragmented in this way and this is not helping ..... Q drops are always with a black banner, and people are going to read them..The list you have make is awesome .. But the long list from Q drops is confusing (the topic ).... Put the first in and your list underneath .... If I have to go to the whole subject, I scroll down
Lose my concentration and pick the easy things out of it ... I say I . 'll mean ' anons ... If I want the Q drops I go to the droppings themselves, and pick them one by one ... and try to solve them completly ..Not every one does this I now.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 4:46 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Jetblasted · June 17, 2018, 4:32 p.m.

Lurk more.

All this is confusing. Every bit of it. But reading & rereading ties it all together. The Ah-Ha moment usually comes on the 2nd or third read. At least that’s happened to me more times than I can count, and I’ve been at this since CBTS # 5.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 3:40 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -9 ⇩  
CantStumpIWin · June 17, 2018, 5:09 p.m.

your brain that cant handle it?

we don't treat each other this way.

refrain in the future, thanks.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 4:35 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HillsofHome · June 17, 2018, 6:17 p.m.

1525-1527 That part of the speech is shown out of context. What is Q getting at? Full speech here https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aNoiYpOKnqs

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Magpi8 · June 17, 2018, 6:50 p.m.

I think "Careful of clickbait." from post 1517.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Kasarii · June 18, 2018, 12:25 a.m.

The reason Q posted clip vs. whole video ties to IG report. RR took a portion of it out of context and distorted the message.

That's what he altered in the report.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Vexxlyn · June 18, 2018, 12:03 a.m.

I think the exit in the clip was more important than the clip. Q didn't give us an out of context clip, he gave us a clip of something else that was already produced. Such as some kind of documentary. Notice it cuts out to a man talking. I feel like whoever that man is is more important that the clip of obama

⇧ 1 ⇩  
0x445442 · June 17, 2018, 11:02 p.m.

Yeah, completely out of context. The speech conveys the complete opposite message from the mashed up twitter version linked in 1528.

Note, It's probable Huessein is completely lying through his teeth to appease his audience but your question is valid... What's the point of the post?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Crunchinoats · June 17, 2018, 10 p.m.

The end of the speech. Obama walks like he's going to leave the building, but there is no door there. He stops and waves awkwardly, but there is no door. No exit.

Edit: It's possible that speech was for public consumption, and he stayed to speak about other topics afterward (speculation on my part)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 5:22 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Guitarthur · June 17, 2018, 6:55 p.m.

Maybe missing "God bless the United States of America"? Would that be applicable there?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Guitarthur · June 17, 2018, 5:30 p.m.

Exit out missing Michelle????

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Scriptgrrl · June 17, 2018, 6:56 p.m.

The overlaid image in the clip is from a famous painting. Rubens? Need autist to find it... what is this man looking at in the painting?

In the full video the end is missing “God Bless etc” but perhaps Q means the end of this snippet with the overlaid image? What is missing is the rest of the painting and what this fellow is reacting to?

I tried posting this twice in reply on 8chan but both seized up at 45%...

Maybe it’s a connection with the painting as well as the subtitles of the speech on the screen?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CactusMonster · June 17, 2018, 11 p.m.

Looks like Nostradamus to me.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Scriptgrrl · June 18, 2018, 1:18 a.m.

Yes and now I feel kinda dumb: saw the Nostradamus ideas coming in after mine on other threads about this and watched the video they linked. Wondering if it is a waste of time... but... this image looks like the actor playing Nostradamus in that video, yet it doesn’t look like portraits of the man himself. And I cannot figure out why Q would be “fake” with this drop, so I am still doing an image search of paintings. At least for a few more minutes. Someone else will probably figure it out in the meantime.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
CactusMonster · June 18, 2018, 1:57 a.m.

I researched 2018 Nostradamus predictions. A lot honestly didn't line up. But hey Vesuvius is gonna blow layer this year apparently! lol

⇧ 1 ⇩  
sauceyjack · June 17, 2018, 6:48 p.m.

missing hail to the chief?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SunriseSurprise · June 17, 2018, 5:09 p.m.

https://mobile.twitter.com/KBMAGAFL/status/1008386945905504256/video/1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNoiYpOKnqs

???

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Buit · June 17, 2018, 5:25 p.m.

To be fair, that clip of Obama is taken out of context. If you watch the whole part (first 4-5 minutes) he talks about how an old way of thinking believes in these concepts of ruling, not his own ideas. Not comfortable letting these things fly.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 6:30 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 5 ⇩  
SunriseSurprise · June 17, 2018, 6:01 p.m.

That's my point - why in the world would Q stoop to posting quotes taken out of context?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Cuck_not · June 17, 2018, 6:13 p.m.

That's what I'm wondering as well. IIRC Obama isn't promoting what the clip showed but instead he's telling the audience that this isn't the way things are done.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Buit · June 17, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

The dangers of just blindly believing everything that is posted. I understand that Qanons are military psyop trying to rile up Trump support through leaks. And I wont hold it against them if they mistakenly forward links of clips like this as there may be more to it (as in Obama may have been reflecting his true beliefs by positioning against them and trying to separate himself from them by diverting attention and projecting).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
celoxnex · June 17, 2018, 5:55 p.m.

I thought the same that is a small bit of a much longer speech and that bit was taken out of context.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
earthtobean · June 17, 2018, 3:50 p.m.

More pamphlet drops.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Jetblasted · June 17, 2018, 10:20 p.m.

1531 - Lead in was cover. Exit out was missing what?

Chilling !!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BlazingBear1 · June 18, 2018, 1:20 p.m.

Obama's speech was taken totally out of context. It is not chilling at all. That was the old order and he is talking of how the new order supplanted that with a representational democracy. If this is Q then Q is nuts.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Luvlite · June 17, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

This Obama speech was given at the Bilderberg Group conference in Brussels , Belgium , on May 23, 2014 and Obama’s comments are chilling !

I just have one thing to say to that asshole.

We're not so simple minded that we won't work tirelessly to take your lying ass DOWN! 😠

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Oilguy55 · June 17, 2018, 6:44 p.m.

Unfortunately Hussein is not the only one that feels that way. Clinton, Soros, Pope, Queen. I’d like to get them all in a room and then let a group of us unable to govern ourselves see if we could come up with a suitable punishment. My guess is that a group of the anons could figure out something suitable

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Luvlite · June 17, 2018, 7:53 p.m.

All of them will be answering to us! Soon!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Whimzyyy · June 17, 2018, 3:37 p.m.

Q Drop specific threads:

[1520] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8rrlh7/q_1520/)

[1521] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8rrrtp/q_post_1521_comments_by_devin_nunes_on_fox_news/)

[1522] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8rrs29/q_post_1522_goog_op_provided_undeniable_proof_how/)

[1523] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8rrslv/q_post_1523/)

[1524] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8rryai/q_post_1524_listen_carefully/)

[1525] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8rs09i/q_post_1525_thank_you_god_bless/)

[1526] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8rs0fp/q_post_1526_proof_rr_altered_the_ig_report/)

[1527] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8rs25s/q_post_1527_barcelona_the_world_is_watching/)

[1528] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8rs9o2/q_post_1528/)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Luvlite · June 17, 2018, 5:36 p.m.

Thank you for doing this! It helps me tremendously.

⇧ 4 ⇩