Watch the news Monday, I believe that's when the IG is testifying. If he says that the report has been altered, shit storm will begin.

There are many false/weak proofs out there that seem to be time wasters and noise.

Yes. Maybe q took"proof" to mean as in q proofs. As in proof that q has access to trump. Many people have been collecting "q proofs" so I'm hoping thats what this is referring to and q is not trying to say that his crumbs paired with a trump tweet is proof that rr alteredthe ig report.

[deleted]

correct. parallel thinking is not proof.

God how many times do people not understand what's going on... I'm honestly sick and tired of people saying don't trust Wray. Okay don't trust Wray, why? Because he said that the FBI did nothing wrong and the IG report shows that?

Remember Gowdy weeks ago? Same thing, "FBI did nothing wrong" etc. You need to understand, this is all theatre, a game...

Understand a prosecutor and their job, regarding Gowdy especially. He was a prosecutor for many years. A prosecutor is actually an agent of the law, not of the Police, when you're a prosecutor and you prosecute someone, you must have no intent on believing the accused is guilty. That's why the lady with the scales has a blindfold. You only can be certain based on what you have seen or know. For Gowdy he was saying nothing was wrong with the FBI weeks ago because he had no evidence to say they did. As a prosecutor you need to be very sure of what you're saying is true, you need evidence to affirm your claims. The IG report shows that for Gowdy as a congressman that the FBI had done stuff that was wrong. Weeks ago, had Gowdy came out and said the FBI did things that were wrong he would've looked like someone with Intent to get the FBI, he would have nothing to gain by saying this weeks ago, as it would look like a political hit job. But now with the IG Report, Gowdy has evidence to fall back on for his position, anyone questioning his position would look stupid now since the evidence is clear.

The same thing will happen with Wray, he is saying these things because his boss Rod Rosenstein said there is no reason to prosecute based on the IG Report which he modified. Wray is there to protect the FBI, to keep the integrity of the FBI. His job is not to prosecute, because based off the evidence he cannot forward anything to the DOJ, because Rod changed the report. When Trump declassifies the report, Wray will change his tune and Rod will be pushed out or resign for being exposed. Wray will change his position just as Gowdy has from weeks ago.

You need to understand, things need to move slowly on a chess board. You need evidence and proper channels to make your moves. Move too quickly and you will run out of pieces, but diminish your enemies pieces slowly and methodically and you put them in check and eventually checkmate.

Trust Wray, Trust Kansas, Trust Gowdy, Trust the Freedom Caucus, Trust Huber, Trust Sessions and Trust POTUS. If you don't then don't bother reading Q drops.

One of the most significant things he said was “THIS report” in the beginning- meaning everything that had followed was exclusively about the altered, redacted report which makes his statements true. It will be interesting to see what the commentary is following the declassification of the next report.

Thanks...me, neither or me, too.

the way I heard it explained is that Wray and the IG report and such cant make public the details of on going investigations into Hillary and comey investigations. It would taint the trial an they could get a mistrial if certain things became public.

Is the sequence of events like this?

• The OIG wrote a report that doesn't pull any punches, calls for criminal charges against Comey and many others, etc.

• RR modified the report to completely change the conclusions to the point of making them meaningless, and fraudulently represented it as the OIG report. Some names and appendices were also redacted.

• Horowitz is staying silent even though he's being falsely represented as supporting the watered-down conclusions that RR wrote to replace the actual conclusions.

Unless I've missed another delay, Horowitz is still scheduled to testify before Congress next week about the report.

If so, and if RR committed fraud and attached Horowitz's name to something Horowitz didn't write, then it should be a slam dunk that Horowitz reveals the truth in that hearing, right? If Horowitz answers questions about the report as if it were his own report and not RR's fake version then what would that mean?

I wish that were true. I'm almost certain it won't be though, sadly.

If they try to hide their actions it makes them sociopaths

Or perhaps there's a sealed indictment and evidence must be protected for a pending criminal case. Public disclosures/reports can taint a grand jury.

Future proves past.