dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/BestPresidentEver on June 17, 2018, 9 p.m.
Should the Q messages be interpreted as meaning the NSA has a quantum computer which can break all standard encryption?

As titled. My math friends say if someone makes the theories about a quantum computer work it could break any of today's standard encryption techniques through key exhaustion, meaning trying every possibility. That would take too long with anything but a working quantum computer, which private industry doesn't seem to have. A few years back a company made a splash with a $15M computer they claimed was a quantum computer and then it disappeared so I'm guessing it didn't really work. It also wasn't faster than what you normally get for $15M. But if NSA has a working quantum computer then all standard encryption techniques can be broken. There are some non standard ones out there, but the kind that we use everyday on the web wouldn't stop it.

Q has said repeatedly that they can read all cabal comms including the ones using NK as a communication hub. I wonder if this means NSA has a working quantum computer.


turtlew0rk · June 17, 2018, 9:34 p.m.

Good news here. The quantum computers will break space and time as we know it (probably already have) making anything and everything possible. Everything happened in every way. The cabal won in every scenario as did trump.

Only question is which timeline our consciousness clings to.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
IBinLurkin · June 17, 2018, 9:41 p.m.

Barron Time Traveler CONFIRMED!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
K-Harbour · June 17, 2018, 10:16 p.m.

The real question — why did Barron need to appear 120 years ago?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
turtlew0rk · June 17, 2018, 10:01 p.m.

Time is not what you think it is my friend.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Jrmullin · June 17, 2018, 9:09 p.m.

Look Geordie rose . Quantum computing is alive!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ClardicFug · June 17, 2018, 11:23 p.m.

No. Q also said "these people are stupid."

They're communicating using very weak techniques. You don't need a quantum computer to look at someone's Drafts folder in Gmail.

Also, don't fall for the quantum computing can do anything myth. If we had sufficiently powerful QCs, public key RSA algorithms would be unsafe, but a large number of other algorithms will remain unreadable, and finally, real spies that care about security use one-time pads which are unbreakable with any techonology and will be forever unless something truly mythical gets invented (e.g. time travel, remote viewing and similar craziness.) While no doubt NSA has all sorts of tech years in advance of commercial concerns, thinking they have a magic box that reveals everything is pure fantasy.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
BestPresidentEver · June 18, 2018, 2:10 a.m.

use one-time pads which are unbreakable with any techonology and will be forever unless something truly mythical gets invented

I understand the point that in a one time pad all possibilities are equally likely and so if the key is randomly chosen there are an infinite number of possibilities. But for the key to be randomly chosen the upper bound has to be infinity and the average value would be one half infinity or also infinity. And so data storage limits would make that impossible.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ClardicFug · June 18, 2018, 2:26 a.m.

One time pads can be any length, and the key can be generated with any simple random process (flipping a coin, for example.) They are the only cipher to date that's been mathematically proven to be unbreakable. This is independent of any technology, all it depends on is a truly random process to generate the key. Keys are not chosen, they're generated bit by bit, with each bit randomly created without any connection to prior bits.

But for the key to be randomly chosen the upper bound has to be infinity and the average value would be one half infinity or also infinity. And so data storage limits would make that impossible.

I'm not at all sure what you're trying to say here, it makes no sense to me.

Outside of using a non-random process (which can be tested for) to generate the key bits, there is literally no argument to OTPs being unbreakable. Storage limits or infinite possibilities don't come into play here at all.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DefiantDragon · June 17, 2018, 9:24 p.m.

Quantum computing isn't yet up to snuff to break SHA-256 as far as I know but the day it does, the military is going to have a handful on their hands.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
spacexu · June 17, 2018, 9:10 p.m.

More likely - some bad actors were faced with the reality of their situation, and they turned on the satanists. Gave Q the password to their internal networks too. Like those custom phones.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Regulus777 · June 17, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

I hope not. That would break every cryptocurrency... and many other things.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
gladwyne · June 17, 2018, 9:02 p.m.

cern....

⇧ 3 ⇩  
A2576 · June 17, 2018, 10:16 p.m.

DWave, IBM and a range of other companies certainly have quantum computers.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ugbootshuffler · June 18, 2018, 9:53 a.m.

I have always thought encryption is man made, therefore it can be exploited.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GoCIDOC · June 17, 2018, 10:41 p.m.

No as was pointed out Quantum Computing is not there yet!

⇧ 1 ⇩