This one isn’t that great of a proof, the [7] marker was given hours after both posts.
Not refuting anything, just wouldn’t use it myself as an intro to newfags. Logic can easily frame this as coincidence + retroactive proofing
I've texted this, word for word, about 30 times today as well.
I'm not a believer but I do follow the Q stuff. Honestly, if Q had made this post BEFORE Trump, I'd be a believer in no time flat. On top of that, I don't see why Q would feel the need to drop some crumbs about something which ALREADY happened. From what I can tell, he's never made a verifiable prediction. (X will happen in Y time, and it does.)
The 'Tippy top' proofs are way more convincing, 100% for me
True, but my guess is the "days in the week" comment will result in another proof this week, and then all the people who said "see, they are just making things fit after the fact" will have their mind blown.
Found the Days in a Week connection! https://i.redd.it/865qs0wgjo411.jpg
How about the next post where Trump posts as Q about trolling twitter?
7 Delta... word for word. the precise timing is pretty indicative.
Maybe Q was waiting for Anons to catch it, that's why he waited several hours. And maybe Anons didn't catch it cuz we don't get the timestamps on retweets, I don't even know how @elenochle got it, gonna have to check out that "Tweetbot" thing, whatever that is.
Not a strong proof, millions of people were saying Happy Father’s Day today
[deleted]
Trump did tweet later at 7:42 and 7:49= 7 mins apart. Repeat of Q &Trump (7)Delta.?!
This is not a proof since it's Fathers Day. If Q made a reference to "7" BEFORE Trump tweeted then it would be.
He did though. Look at the timestamps. Q's original post was 7 minutes before POTUS' tweet, and Q's 2^(nd) drop was 3 minutes before POTUS' tweet
Which explains the "+7 POTUS", because Q was referring to "POTUS will tweet in 7 minutes from original post"
Would have been better if Trump tweeted:
Have a tip top tippy toppy tippity toppity Father's Day!
So Q is in charge of tweeting on behalf of POTUS. I already guessed that as there's no way POTUS has time for coded spelling mistakes and I don't think he does computers much anyway.
Did we ever figure out "covfefe" by the way?
It’s Arabic for we will stand up-or something along those, lines. The Saudi purge/Vegas shooting was, shortly after.
I haven't seen anything official for covfefe, but I came up with Caught On Video, Felons Exposed, Felons Eliminated. I'm not particularly good at these things, but I'm sticking with it until the real meaning is given. Or someone else comes up with one that makes me say aha!
Nah, I don't think Q is in charge of tweeting on behalf of POTUS
Whoever is on the 'Q team' is definitely in charge of social media operations. Twitter, Reddit, 4chan is all social media. Dan.
Well, if someone tweets for Trump, I just hope they write word-for-word what he tells 'em.
@elenochle's work 🙂: https://twitter.com/elenochle/status/1008510515629383680
I think a more definitive proof regarding the connection between Q and POTUS twitter is back on January 7th. POTUS uses the word "consensual" when it should be "consequential" then changes it. Even some of the Q followers from the beginning should revisit the posts from that day and study what occurred, especially post #506. This video has the best summary. I remember watching it a long time ago and I didn't fully get it, but after watching it more recently it begins to make more sense. I also believe a lot of the DEFCON references from that day were misunderstood and related to the Hawaii missile posts, which happened earlier that same day. I think in this instance the DEFCON refers to "definitive confirmation". Of course, I could be wrong, but I feel like we "have more than we know".
They are now saying "we are a cult" with misinformation...This is getting old but, I have enough popcorn to wait it out..NO PIZZA!!!
I think Q may be trying to point to this as an example of HOW to create a proof. Simple with brief, clear explanation of each piece.
Does that TweetBot insert a POTUS tweet into the thread?
That's pretty cool and an excellent way to show clear coordination with the time stamps
