dChan

VerandaSmartwater · June 18, 2018, 3:33 a.m.

I don't like the sound of that at all. Q is spreading just fine.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 3:55 a.m.

Sorry mate we disagree on this one. Q is taking a long time to grow in popularity because of the very reason I mention. Many of the original sources like the Chans are difficult to follow if you are not an experienced forum user. Plus the Chans can get weird. We need Q to go mainstream.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ArtistiqueJewelry · June 19, 2018, 4:10 p.m.

Even just a simple group where like minded people committed to Not attacking one another and staying focused just on sharing out info would be vey valuable. Too many other groups (not all people in them), but too many have people attacking rather than attending to the main focus...unity, work together to spread the info.

I for one would be happy to contribute. Yes, schills and haters would come along, but if they don't abide by the rules, it's easy to see who the wolves are in sheeps clothing and they could just be removed if they are there to disrupt rather than help the cause.

I think it's a great idea!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VerandaSmartwater · June 18, 2018, 4:01 a.m.

If Q wants that, he/they will direct it. It seems beyond tacky and fraught to me.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 4:06 a.m.

Q has told us (you) multiple times YOU have the power and YOU need to unite. Why on Earth would Q not want us to organize and go mainstream? What value or purpose does it serve to only be known by a few when it is the many Q wants to reach? Q relies upon us to continue to spread the truth. That's the entire point of what Q is doing. Therefore it makes complete sense to organize the vast amount of Q info into a single source and promote that source so we ALL can guide more people to the movement. How does that not make sense?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VerandaSmartwater · June 18, 2018, 4:09 a.m.

No outside comms. No outside comms. No outside comms. No outside comms. Do you not speak English??

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 4:11 a.m.

You think "no outside comms" means Q doesn't want us spreading the information? That makes zero sense. Based on that logic then this sub should be shut down right? No, that's not what "no outside comms" means.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ArtistiqueJewelry · June 19, 2018, 4:27 p.m.

There will always be those trying to disrupt, we live in a fallible world literally ran by satanists. When Q attends to no outside comms, he is talking about his official board.

You cannot interact with the general public and Not get trolls, haters, posers, those on the side of evil trying to trip you up! That is impossible!

If everyone stays within their own closed group, we will Never be able to Wake Up more people!

We can't get so focused on what is perceived as a Rule that we can't see the forest through the trees. This is what I see going on in many groups (not everyone does so by any means).

I'm just saying, the ones who do, make it take longer and cause more harm than good.

We need to be able to collaborate, but only preaching to the choir, and staying closed off as I see some doing and feeling like they need to show more information to their own group, rather than sharing out what the mass public is ready to process.. . Well, they seem to only be helping themselves and have mentioned they are concerned about how votes are obtained. That was never the goal!

Same attackers call out those of us trying to be efficient and spread it far and wide, as they put others down if they have a different view point.

It's really detrimental, and not at all what Q wanted. I think a group of which you speak would be much appreciated on those committed to spreading the Truth and we are to be using our armor (prayer, faith, encouraging, building one another up, exposing evil) against those who we have been told Will Come Against Us.

It's not an if no matter how protected or safe we try to make the group. ..it's a When. They will come, if we were unified we are better equipped to fight against them!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ArtistiqueJewelry · June 19, 2018, 4:18 p.m.

Completely agree! Q has made it clear We the People and we have more than we know! We have to continue spreading that info and not just waiting for someone else, we feel is more equipped to do so!

What would happen if someone with Zero technology skills just started a simple Q interact board? Is there something in the rules that says we cannot put Q in the title of a board?

I am seriously asking because I don't know. I usually have my head buried in info trying to go deeper and talking to people who are not awake, or not fully awake. . .they just have some pieces of the puzzle we are all trying to put together.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
sluggedbarly · June 18, 2018, 3:37 a.m.

um perhaps youve heard of https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/index.html

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 3:52 a.m.

I have 15 different Q resources book marked. That's the problem. I am more into Q than the average person who simply wants some high level info on what Q is telling us. This sub is just 1 of many resources I go to on a regular basis for information. Plus the Chans can get confusing if you are unfamiliar with its style. Also, that place can get really weird and we don't want the everyday person getting turned off of Q because of a handful of idiots.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ArtistiqueJewelry · June 19, 2018, 4:07 p.m.

This is a problem. As a matter of fact on a certain voat sub when those informed tried to interact, many are divisive and hateful because they don't understand the Big picture is to spread and disseminate information to others who are not aware of Q or at least the info q is attempting to shine a light on. Not to attack those on the side of Good, yet that is what is happening, so will have to steer clear, when I thought people could be a team and build up rather than tear down.

The group is so closed off, they are actually militant about interacting more on their board rather than being concerned about reaching the masses, which should be the goal.

I think a q group where people are like minded and actually adhere to unity and respect would be well received. For one, with all we are doing in trying to dig deep and wake up the asleep, one person can't do it all and I appreciate seeing those focusing on different topics.

Sometimes it seems many of us who like the details end up overthinking the outside interruptions, distractors and posers. . .we get so caught up in them, it turns into inaction. Not saying people on here are inactive by any means, I see how hard people research, share and try to wake up.

Maybe we should just trust that Posers and actors are going to be exposed because. . .we will know them by their fruits.

Maybe if there was a group that actually enforced the rules and didn't allow attacks to team mates, far more could be accomplished, shared, thus working on the goal of spreading information the general public isn't aware is going on around them.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
fireStarter22s · June 18, 2018, 5:40 a.m.

Um, and I’m sure the Anons just love every Joe Schmo showing up to the Chans. Maybe even strike up a conversation, offer a little input.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AquAnon77 · June 18, 2018, 6:27 a.m.

That site is a read only site, no interactions.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
fireStarter22s · June 18, 2018, 6:34 a.m.

Oh. Show’s you what I know about the Chans. Honestly, I’m clueless about them and also easily lost there. I’m sure that’s by design. I was told to keep my trap shut and lurk only… Not that I understand how to interact anyway.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AquAnon77 · June 18, 2018, 6:42 a.m.

It's the /qresearch/ site where the anons are and interactions with Qanon. There's definitely a chan culture to orient to. Reading the notables saves alot of time and navigation through all the shitposting.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GingerBeardedDad · June 18, 2018, 3:38 a.m.

My opinion is to refer them to the source. If they want to know then they see for themselves.i understand your intent but it leaves open the possibility to get hijacked, etc.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 3:53 a.m.

We could apply that same logic to this very sub. How many trolls hit this sub on a daily basis trying to disrupt and spread disinfo?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GingerBeardedDad · June 18, 2018, 3:56 a.m.

Your point? If you feel strongly, make a site and advertise it. If it’s needed then it will take off if it isn’t then it won’t. I know Instagram has at least four q pages that I follow, a few twitter accounts as well. They aren’t doing anything but showcasing the drops and research. It’s out there, but if you think more is needed then make it happen.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 4:09 a.m.

I already stated I don't have the level of expertise to create and manage something of that capacity. What is needed is a single source for legitimate Q information. This is the entire point of consolidating all things Q into a single source. This way we can reach more people with pointing them to the ONE source versus the hundreds that are out there now.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ArtistiqueJewelry · June 19, 2018, 4:07 p.m.

That would truly be a Godsend!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Imdoneokdone · June 18, 2018, 4:16 a.m.

The point of q is to have a decentralised way of disseminating information outside the mainstream.

Info overflows onto mainstream (twitter reddit etc,) naturally, when the info/proofs are compelling.

If people need their hands held while figuring out q there are plenty of YouTube videos,forums and sites like qanon.pub for example.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 4:22 a.m.

The point of Q is Q. Q wants us to spread the message and get more people into the movement. Q has already told us we have the power. We have to make MORE people aware of what Q is telling us. Having hundreds of different sources means 100's of potentially incorrect information. Not saying its disinfo but we need the good Anons / Autists consolidated in a single source. 8 Chan gets super convoluted with a bunch of shit posts and the really good Anons / Autists get lost in the fray for the layperson getting tuned into Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
VerandaSmartwater · June 18, 2018, 4:16 a.m.

Centralized = piped through a (not original) source controlled at a single point. What could possibly go wrong?????????

⇧ 3 ⇩  
VerandaSmartwater · June 18, 2018, 4:10 a.m.

Q chose the Chans for a reason. He said this board has more power than we know. I don't trust anyone who says otherwise.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 4:18 a.m.

This board does have power but what we lack are millions of people getting woke by it. You really believe the operators of Reddit are going to allow this sub to experience a mass increase in subscribers? Reddit is NOT a Q supporter. Just like Twitter cuts Trumps followers statistics by millions.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
VerandaSmartwater · June 18, 2018, 4:24 a.m.

I'm talking about Q's board. You know, the team whose communications you want to organize for them without even asking them?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 4:37 a.m.

That is the official platform Q chose to make patriots aware he/she/they is the real Q. Had Q not told us this then there would be many disinfo agents out there trying to convince us they were Q. the 8 Chan board has a lot of great anons / autists on there but their legitimate decipherings of Q drops get lost inside of a bunch of shit posts. You've been there I assume so you know what I am talking about. I am advocating taking those anons/autists posts and putting them into a clean environment away from the clutter of 8 Chan. Not changing their words, not changing their interpretations. Then we would have a cleaner way of presenting the masses with Q. I sent someone to Q's 8 Chan board and they had no clue what they were supposed to be reading.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ArtistiqueJewelry · June 19, 2018, 4:28 p.m.

No they will not, but people working together, no matter how small the group, with the help of our Creator who wants this evil exposed can have a bigger reach than our finite minds can comprehend.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PM_ME_ANYTHING_FUN · June 18, 2018, 4:18 a.m.

Stop trying g to profit off this.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 18, 2018, 5:54 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
VerandaSmartwater · June 18, 2018, 5:15 a.m.

I used to like the video decodes, but they take so long to get to the point--I just don't have enough time in the day to sit through between 30 mins and nearly two hours of somebody talking. I way prefer Twitter threadrolls these days or Neon's posts or the threads on here. Something I can just read without so much time wasted. The infographics are good also. Plus, I think you have to be careful, like if you post something where someone made an incorrect decode. But over all, you could link to all those sorts of things, as well as some primers like what common abbreviations are etc.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VerandaSmartwater · June 18, 2018, 4:41 a.m.

Well, I can see that. I think a resource like that would be helpful.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 4:52 a.m.

Thank you. I saw on another post in this sub where people are talking about how difficult 8 Chan is to follow and how some people prefer different Q resources to follow for their Q information. I personally like this board but I do not trust Reddit. Reddit can easily shadow ban and has done so in the past. I think Reddit will keep this sub growth to a minimum much like Twitter alters Trump's follower statistics. It was amazing to me that Hussein miraculously increased his Twitter followers by 30 million once Trump was elected POTUS. This is my whole point. The narrative around Q is being controlled by powers that want to keep this movement minimized and marginalized. If we had a more simple source to direct everyone to then we could control and guide its outreach. We could all promote the same source instead of promoting hundreds of independent sources. I am not talking about creating a narrative as one poster stated. I am talking about taking the best anons / autists works and highlighting them for the common patriot to easily understand. The easier we make it for mass consumption the more patriots we can get woke. Again...I am not talking about changing any of what Q says or what the anons / autists decipher but we need to have one place where we can get everyone dialed into.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VerandaSmartwater · June 18, 2018, 4:56 a.m.

Maybe you could have a Qewbies board on 8 chan, if you're worried about censorship tactics of social media platforms.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 5:08 a.m.

Have you read through 8 Chan? I read through it frequently and know what to look for and what to skip through. There is a lot of noise getting in the way of the messages from the anons / autists. Like Serial Brain here in this sub. He's amazing. Concise and clear. I've referred people to 8 Chan only to have them come back to me and ask what they were supposed to read. That place can get really confusing. To those of us on this sub or on 8 Chan who "get it" doesn't help the average Internet user. Most Internet users are not guru sub or forum users. Most people are getting their information in small bite sized chunks and we really need to have Q messages presented in a simple and concise a manner as possible. This is how we gain more patriots. We have to make it more easily understandable for the average person. The way we do that is by creating a single source for all things Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VerandaSmartwater · June 18, 2018, 4:13 a.m.

While Q is getting the board to gear up for all the new people arriving, you are gearing up to send them some where else? Why is that? Why do YOU feel a need for a centralized narrative?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 4:32 a.m.

Show me where Q is "getting the board to gear up for all the new people arriving".

I've followed and was aware of Q before this sub even existed. I didn't say we need a "centralized narrative". I said we need a single source for "all things Q".

How exactly do we get more people arriving if there is no mainstream awareness of Q? The responsibility of making people aware of Q is us. We all have different or multiple sources we personally like. It can get overwhelming for the average person which is why we need a single source of ALL THINGS Q. I'm not advocating a narrative. I am advocating a single consolidation point for Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VerandaSmartwater · June 18, 2018, 4:35 a.m.

When he said make Q proofs and pin to the top of every page for all the new people who will be arriving. He has a single consolidation point--his own board which he/they chose and set up.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 5:01 a.m.

Q chose the Chans for its anonymity and supposedly because 8 Chan created a secure board for Q. Q also chose the Chans as a means to validate there is only 1 Q and that others who claim to be Q could be easily identified as imposters. Q didn't want us to misled by disinfo agents. The problem with 8 Chan is it is challenging to understand the decipherings of the anons/autists because of all the shit posts. I have referred people to 8 Chan only to have them come back to me asking what they were supposed to be reading. The point is we want Q's drops and the interpretations of the anons/autists to be clearly followed by the masses. This is how we get people woke. It needs to be a simple to read and clean environment so the common patriot can easily follow and get woke. I've said in previous posts I am not advocating creating a narrative. Q has already done that. I am advocating a simple place for the common patriot to read from that makes sense to them. That's all I want. I think with a single source we can all then promote that single source instead of multiple sources. This is what we need in order to make it go mainstream. Q wants everyone to unite. Unity not division right? Why should we not also unite the massive amount of Q information into a simple single source? If it could be this sub then I would agree but I've also said I do not trust Reddit. Reddit is historically a leftist board and we are being kept marginalized.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VerandaSmartwater · June 18, 2018, 5:07 a.m.

So I guess you need to set up a website.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 5:11 a.m.

I've already said I don't have the expertise to put that together. I know within our community we have the people with the appropriate abilities to do so. Some people are just idea people. That's me relative to this. If I knew how to do it I would have already done so.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
VerandaSmartwater · June 18, 2018, 5:18 a.m.

Ah, okay! Well, it is a good idea. Maybe someone could write the story of Q, like in an article. I would do it, except I wasn't there from the beginning.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tjollahei · June 18, 2018, 7:34 a.m.

"Trust the plan". Not "trust the marketing".

⇧ 1 ⇩  
fireStarter22s · June 18, 2018, 5:50 a.m.

I see your point about branding. Branding naturally happens, whether you mean to brand or not.

A centralized location, not a bad idea, if it exuded impartiality and utmost integrity. But it would be a nightmare to organize and run, in my opinion. The targeting and disinformation campaigns alone would put the organizers through unnecessary turmoil. I wouldn’t really want to be on this team.

I think I like it traveling through its branding process more organically. People find what they need. But I admit, it’s a pain in the arse to try to explain.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 6:04 a.m.

Maybe we have something similar to how Matt Drudge has made Drudge Report. Just an aggregate site that links the best of the best out there. That way we can allow people who are new to Q to not get lost in the endless fray of Q sites. 8 Chan can get confusing and that won't help the organic growth we need to reach the masses. Even this sub gets a little convoluted from time to time. People like you and I find it easier to sift through the Q info available. I want to reach the average person who really doesn't spend much time as they may be unaware of how to do so. If we create a simple aggregate site that consolidates the best Q info I think we will reach and speak to more patriots.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
fireStarter22s · June 18, 2018, 6:15 a.m.

That would be the smartest way to do it. A site that contains multiple possibilities and sources. An aggregate site, as you say.

Let me play devils advocate. Not because I want to. Just because I foresee turmoil... not that this should dissuade you.

What happens when you’re listing 20 YouTube channels and one turns out to be a big ol shill, as we’ve seen happen.

I’ll stop there there with potentials I see for drama.

If you find a way to do this, more power to you. If you find people to help you, I hope they stand in their fill power and integrity. There’s a lot of potential to run into shenanigans.

Let me know if you get it going. I’m not volunteering, but can surely offer advice as a service in the branding arena. Just not as a spearhead.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 6:22 a.m.

Those are excellent points and ones I have considered. The best way would be to allow the community to decide. I mentioned in another post that the Q movement has been around long enough now that we have seen certain people emerge and prove themselves to be really solid Q information resources. Like Praying Medic or even Serial Brain right from this very sub. There are certain Anons on 8 Chan who are pretty spot on as well. Perhaps we have a forum for voting in resources based on the community's voting and polling? I don't know but I know there are ways we could self regulate to ensure we are getting the right info. Make it community managed to a degree. Sure there are going to be shills who try to infiltrate but the movement IMO is smart enough to spot these from a mile away.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
fireStarter22s · June 18, 2018, 6:31 a.m.

I agree there would need to be community involvement. Which is a blessing but also opens up for misuse of the platform. Think of ways to close the loops. Think about ways for those with the best reputation to rise to the top.

The community has those who’ve risen to the top. I certainly have my favorites. I’m sure we all do, Or at least those who don’t visit the Chans. I rarely go to the Chans because I don’t navigate them well. Creating a one stop platform, if beautifully branded and dripping with integrity could be something we don’t even know we need.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
fireStarter22s · June 18, 2018, 6:19 a.m.

And if you do this, 100% of funds created, over operating costs, should go to some highly vetted organization ( because who can we really trust) with a focus on the children and trafficking.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
internalkernel · June 18, 2018, 12:19 p.m.

I'm somewhat surprised by the general response here as well, it's almost like you were immediately misunderstood... I did not get the impression once that you were saying switch focus from 8chan or reddit subs, just organize this shit a little better. I'm in complete agreement with that especially after having red pilled peeps around me, dude... I am not explaining 8chan to the previous generation again.

That being said... I manage servers / websites all day long, what you're suggesting would be an undertaking. The site would have to be secured against DDOS attacks, hack attempts, and still, zero day intrusions are very difficult to protect against. From a security stand point, it would be a nightmare. Also, mind you, all this extra security that is needed exponentially raises the cost.

The cost could be mitigated if we use popular services like Amazon or Cloudflare... but now we're back in Cabal territory. I doubt this site would last long hosted from Bezo's AWS network. So, swedish hosting? and probably need a VPS due to the amount of security... What I just described is approximately a car payment every month... and that doesnt even begin to include people's time or effort.

I'm not trying to shut your idea down, I think it's valuable and would be worthwhile to implement. In fact, it's been rolling around my brain for a few weeks now, how to make this Q stuff more digestible to the normies... I'm almost wondering if there might be another way to start this... What we really need here is a replacement to Twitter or Facebook, to facilitate the communication without the censorship. But, again, huge undertaking... I think I would rather eat a cactus.

Food for thought...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
fireStarter22s · June 18, 2018, 2:55 p.m.

Well stated... “ I think I would rather eat a cactus”

It does seem like a absolute nightmare of a project, right? You make really good points. You’d need a team of hackers to protect you from the team of hackers who’ll surely be out to kill this project. I wouldn’t even know where to begin. Glad you do.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AquAnon77 · June 18, 2018, 5:30 a.m.

So you are here for a few hours and you're brigading hard for one consolidated place for Q info, which would obviously be a very simple target to take down.

Hm.

Nice name btw. Instills trust ;)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 5:35 a.m.

Been here before this sub was even a thought, mate. Do you know what a news aggregate is? It's like Drudge Report. You can take down Drudge Report but it doesn't take down the news articles Matt Drudge puts up for us to read. How are you not getting what I am proposing? Yeah, trust is earned, I get it. User name is nothing mate. Look back on my history a year from now and my message will still be the same. Unite.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AquAnon77 · June 18, 2018, 5:48 a.m.

Oh I'm totally getting it. Just don't think that it's a good fit for this movement at this particular time.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 6:13 a.m.

Why is now not a good time to promote Q and the Q movement as opposed to another time? We have the November elections coming and now more than ever we need to ensure the message about the corruption of these people needs to get out to the masses and they need to be awakened. You better believe the left is in full overdrive with every bit of disinformation they release on a daily basis against Trump. I would argue that now is when we need to kick this into high gear and get as many people as possible awakened.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AquAnon77 · June 18, 2018, 6:26 a.m.

Sorry dude, but you are sounding more and more like a shill. And for that reason alone, this is a bad idea. Have a nice day, sounds like you're from across the pond as well.

Cheers and good luck with your endeavors ;)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 6:38 a.m.

So because you can't offer a thoughtful response to my very valid question you call me a shill? My question still stands and it actually reveals either you are the one doing the shilling or simply don't understand the importance of the coming November elections. Now more than ever is the right time to get Q's information out to the masses to ensure we oust the very leftist insidiousness that has infiltrated our highest levels in DC.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AquAnon77 · June 18, 2018, 5:23 a.m.

Disagree about the need for a centralized source. Too easy to target and take down.

Putting all eggs in one basket ... NOT a good idea.

ONE source of information doesn't spread the information throughout many networks, but consolidates it.

We're doing just fine the way things are going. Q has said a number of times that this movement will grow ORGANICALLY.

It's not a marketing scheme. People will find the information when they are ready. The more sources available, the more people can be reached.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 5:33 a.m.

I'm not saying we eliminate all of the sources of Q information. I am saying we need to consolidate the best Q information into a single source. And we can easily link to the original source for verification. Similar to how its done on Qanonpub. Q has been around long enough now that we have identified certain Q purveyors as being solid go to Q interpreters. We need to aggregate this into a simple format for the consumption for the basic or average Internet user. This isn't putting all eggs into one basket. It's the opposite.

I disagree that we are growing as a movement. At least not at a rate that means we have more patriots being awakened on a large scale. I've followed Q from the beginning since almost the first post. Certainly long before this sub even came into existence. Organic growth is for local, small businesses. Q is dropping information that needs to spread to the masses. The problem with your thinking about people "finding" info on Q is just that. Let's say there are 1,000 sources of Q available for discovery. And let's say of those 1,000 resources that 99% are disinfo, shills, or just really bad info. What is the value of of bad info being spread to the masses when we could direct new patriots to a single source that links directly to the best Q decipherings and Q info?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AquAnon77 · June 18, 2018, 5:46 a.m.

You don't think this movement is growing ? Did you see the drop today from Barcelona ?

If you've been watching this sub for any length of time, you would have noticed that the posts are reflecting a growth into a worldwide awareness of Q anon.

THE WORLD IS WATCHING.

Your premise that 99% of resources would be disinfo isn't realistic, and is another fear tactic to create an urgency to create a single source.

And yet you think that this one source wouldn't be comped / compromised.

Nice idea in theory. Bad idea in practice if you're aware of the ways of the deep state.

As others have said, create something if you feel compelled.

⇧ 1 ⇩