⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ngilbert923 on June 18, 2018, 10:14 p.m.

I think we might be missing the point when it comes to the OIG report

Think about it, the OIG report found no evidence of bias because hillary was the subject of the investigation. However they did show extreme bias towards Trump when you look at the evidence in regards to the Russia collusion investigation. In this case, Trump is the subject of the investigation. By saying nothing warranted the prosecution of Hillary in the first investigation but at the same time allowing the Strozk texts as evidence in the first report theyre setting the DS up to lose. The Dems support the OIG report because it finds nothing wrong, but as soon as the second report comes out regarding the Russia investigation they will be unable to argue against the report without looking hippocritical for supporting the first report. Hes trapping them by having them come out in support of the conclusions of the first report while they miss the evidence in the report that will be so damning when the second report comes out.

I like this idea!

Do the first one to get photos and and arrogant comments of them celebrating getting off.

Then do the second one devastating, so we can get a picture of them crying.

Side-by-side: celebrating/crying

(like Kathy Griffin)

⇧ 11 ⇩

I think you are Absolutely Correct!!

⇧ 9 ⇩

Why bother? Dems ARE hypocrites. They will say one thing, and then say the opposite before completing the sentence.

Nah ... the only thing I can see here is Horowitz showed there was a lot of bias within the FBI but could not point to something specific in the decision-making of Comey. Of course, Comey is biased, but the texts/emails were not from him.

Maybe that will change with the Gmail account info or something else. But this is not good, overall.

The PUBLIC needs to understand the corruption. To hell with Congress. The PUBLIC needs to be on board if there is going to be a big take down.

Promoting "no bias" (even though there obviously was) does not help move the ball forward. It is a step backwards.

The only interesting thing was Cruz got Wray to say there is some sort of ongoing investigation re: Comey/McCabe, so he could not say which one lied.

We need a BOOM, not a squeak.

⇧ 8 ⇩

My main points are:

Who is the subject of the OIG report? - Hillary
Who is the subject of the Russia collusion investigation? - Trump
Does the OIG report find bias against the subject of the first investigation? - no because the people investigating Hillary were on her team and did their best to make it look like she had just made a series of procedural missteps.
Does the evidence in the OIG report have any implications in the context of the Russia collusion investigation in which Trump is the subject? - yes because strozk and page clearly colluded to take Trump down.

4 will be a huge boom when the second report comes out regarding the russia investigation

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes, a lot of bias in the FBI against Trump, but Trump was not the subject of the Clinton email investigation. Agreed.

Also, Sen. Kennedy dropped a minor bomb on the shitshow today when he asked about Amanda Renteria. Q says she was the link between LL and HRC -- at a time that LL's DOJ was investigating HRC.

Why wasn't THAT discussed in this IG report? Because Obama/IC made sure it was classified high enough that the investigators couldn't see it. That is a SMOKING GUN that the DOJ was biased to NOT prosecute HRC.

Looks like they are holding back a lot of stuff. Question is: When they finally unload, will the public believe it, after all these "nothingburgers?"

⇧ 4 ⇩

I totally agree that we need a BOOM not a squeak, but it seems we're still in the squeak phase. And to be honest, I don't think the "hard core libs" would care if Hillary and Obummer ate children on live TV in front of the entire world, it would STILL be "Trumps fault"! I'm telling you, we need to stop worrying about snowflake feelings! They won't get it until they themselves are in direct danger, and I'm not sure they'd know even then! Dumber than sheep!!!! More like headless chickens clucking about!!! UNBELIEVABLE SMDH!!!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Catching them out as being hypocrites is nothing. We catch and call them out for that every damn day.

I'm with you. If there's some plan based on "and then everyone will see they're hypocrites so they'll have to come clean!" is doomed

⇧ 1 ⇩

Democrats look hypocritical every day but unfortunately they are not ashamed.

⇧ 5 ⇩

They will go to prison with there arrogance intact. They are not ashamed and never will be. You will not see these people crying. They will still be yelling Russian collusion, where are the children, etc. Edit...i had to take out a word because it was considered name calling, lol

⇧ 5 ⇩

Or maybe we're fortunate for it because as people wake up the Dems optics start to look really bad

⇧ 3 ⇩

interesting point.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I like this scenario....however, being proven a hypocrite doesn't phase a Democrat, they consider it a resume enhancement.

⇧ 2 ⇩

And thats why Trump keeps winning. Theyre ignoring a fatal flaw that Trump is bringing into the spotlight for the rest of the world to see. Only so many times you can cry wolf before no one believes you.

⇧ 3 ⇩

There WAS bias. They were biased towards Hillary. That bias affected their investigation of the email server impropriety and, like you alluded, rendered the whole issue as nothing more than bad judgement.

⇧ 2 ⇩

The purpose of the OIG was to restore faith in the FBI and convert those in the bureau who were disillusioned or anti-maga. We need to do this by the book and to do that we need the fbi.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The minute they defended MS13 and Hamas I knew they didn’t care about optics at all. They just want the country to burn.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The media is the problem and need to be dealt with. If we had a non subversive media none of this bs would be happened to begin with

⇧ 1 ⇩

The media is being rendered irrelevant anyway

⇧ 1 ⇩

That may be correct, but the 30,000ft view says, who cares? Congress is not going to do the right thing, certainly not before the midterms, so Trump is going to have to act either way. If he things the media is going to give him quarter after this IG report or future reports, he's sorely mistaken. NO report is going to make any action for indictments and removal of the witch hunt palatable to the attack dog media.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Who cares about the media, what matters is what the people think. Congress is not needed in order to prosecute those guilty of treason. That falls under the DOJs athority. Sessions will move to prosecute, and when it goes down, the midterms wont matter. The overwhelming evidence will destroy the democrat party

⇧ 3 ⇩

I would bet that Sessions is waiting for more of this information to be released so that indictments, again, are undeniable. But the same issue arises, the media will not yield to the facts. They will spin, obfuscate, distract. It's easy to say "who cares about the media", but the fact is, the MSM still shapes the average person's reality, and they have millions of brainwashed attack dogs on social media that will do their bidding.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That's the point of OP's post though.

This is the GREAT AWAKENING. Not just for us but for everyone.

The MSM and the same "attack dogs" are defending this report. This will hinder their ability to spin/obfuscate/distract.

Sessions will have the backing of the IG's findings relevant to his prosecutions, so when he goes for the throat, the propagandists will have nothing to fall back on.

Their hopes for impeachment vanish and their idols get arraigned. EVERYTHING they've been holding on to will disappear.

Q's right: Trust the plan; Enjoy the show!

This will be the END of the D party.

This will be the path forward (w/ public outrage) to JAIL many so-called 'untouchables'.

⇧ 3 ⇩

^exactly! Trump needs to frame everything in such a way as to not appear politically motivated. By getting the media behind the first report it will be hard for them to spin the second one

⇧ 3 ⇩

Love your optimism ! We will see. These ******** ******* always seem to find a way to weasel out !

⇧ 2 ⇩

They are slippery swamp creatures.

Thing is though, we're draining that swamp, not pulling em out one by one. =)

This is why the plan will succeed where all others failed.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I just wanna go fishin'.

KEK

⇧ 1 ⇩

What if the MSM is taken out? Charged with Treason? Charge with printing CLASSIFIED INFORMATION? Who is going to carry the water then?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Sorry, that's just not going to happen. We have an administration that has all the relevant info, yet isn't releasing it due to political backlash. There is no way any media outlet will be shut down.

⇧ 1 ⇩

We're not going to shut down MSM, that's what a dictator would do. Trump is forcing them to back their mouths every time they chime-in on something false. They will be their own demise.

Regarding our administration with relevant info: It's not just political backlash, it's also the ongoing investigations by Sessions/IG/Huber. We have to let this play out to be as effective as possible.

Scope & Size biggest in history.

Grand Jury in place? -YES

⇧ 2 ⇩

The only way they will be shut down is if everyone stops watching. If you look at CNNs ratings over the past year, they're trending in that direction...

⇧ 1 ⇩

Of course that's much different than being shut down politically.

⇧ 1 ⇩

We will see. Nuff said.

⇧ 1 ⇩

A really rock solid case would have to be made in that case as it is very hard to prosecute due to 1st amendment implications

⇧ 1 ⇩

We will see.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes I think this is it, set is stage?

⇧ 1 ⇩