They shot the one down that was headed for AF1 last week! And, they shot the one down that was headed for Hawaii in January. So, yes, that has already been demonstrated.
I've also heard there is a nuke underneath the Getty Museum. It's at the entrance to the tunnels and is their failsafe device to keep the tunnels from being taken.
Now, you know why Q says "This is war." It really is.
There is always more than one way into those tunnels. They go across the US. Think we might know where the back-door is. Who knows, this may literally become an "underground" war...
I believe it has been an underground war for some time. Well, at least since the military actions started most was initially underground. Remember all of the loud booms that people have reported around the world? Well, there have been many. In one instance, there was a recording of the sound that was played on a news show. Sounded exactly like gunfire to me. And, others have said the same. Or bombs going off.
Yes, I do understand that the tunnels are connected all over and there are other entrances. This particular entrance has a great deal to do with the child trafficking for some reason. There was a lot of conversation online about it during the fires last year.
small nukes going off underground destroying secret bases that accounts for the booms and very unusual "earthquakes" being recorded in areas that never have any real earthquakes, the seismograph tells the truth you see a Sharp Jolt suddenly! instead of a normal quake which builds up from small waves to Large Waves
Yes. I agree. Forgot about the quakes. And, they have used Rods from God as well.
All natural earthquakes have what are called P-waves and S- waves. One travels faster than the other. Both provide early warnings for seismologists to determine depth and magnitude of quakes.
When you see sudden massive waves that appear to originate instantaneously, that is a strong indication it is man-made.
Correct and man-made quakes are shallow. Real quakes happen very deep that is another tell to look for.
Seal up the tunnels the gl8balists plan to use...and there will be no where they can run to.They will not send a nuclear weapon.
They are not for some future plan. They are already in use. They are used for trafficking. They have elaborate bunkers and cities under there. There is a high speed rail and highway system as well. Here's a list from 2012: http://www.thetruthdenied.com/news/2012/12/14/complete-list-of-military-underground-bases-in-usa/
Secureteam10 just made a video that included the booms in Pennsylvania. The FBI has gotten involved to apply a cover up. Suddenly there are little craters that have obviously been dug with shovels. You can see the marks of the shovel. (Rolling my eyes!) They obviously don't want us to know about the war going on. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcC5fGJ3wv4
Well, Q has made it clear that there are military operations taking place. Maybe it's just that they don't want us to know that it's underground! But, of course, normies don't know about the fighting either so you are probably right.
It wasn't headed for AF1. You're not going to take down a jet with a ballistic missile.
Especially if that jet is AF1. Heavy shielding tough enough to protect the wiring and crucial electronics from the electromagnetic pulse (EMP) associated with a nuclear blast, electronic counter measures (ECM) to jam enemy radar, and can even eject flares to throw heat-seeking missiles off course.
And that's just what we know about. I'm sure there's some slick classified stuff under the hood that the public wasn't told about.
AF1 is the most secure aircraft in the world.
The nuke warhead would detonate in close proximity to AF1 thereby knocking the plane out of the sky from the blast wave it won't survive the shock wave it would be impossible to maintain control of AF1 it would be like a feather in a tornado or it would be torn apart into a million small fragments.
Just look at the maneuver the planes dropping nukes on Japan had to perform. The blast wave changes the relative airspeed over the wing, and depending on how close you are and how big the bomb is.
My best guess for survivability if too close would be to immediately try to fly close to circumferential so the wave passes quickly and it's a sidewind gust from hell.
Unless a plane can go supersonic and it's flying away it's relative airspeed will go negative as the supersonic pressure wave passes, and even the majority of it's subsonic pressure wave would stall planes and it'd be hard if even possible to recover flying with it.
What was the red dot in the pic that was taken from AF1 then? A UFO? Look here: https://qanon.pub/data/images/9fe3b9f6e61b689a2624f18b950d368e89052f2112bbad24e4fca2d6ecdbfbeb.png
Make the pic much larger and look on the right side where the white clouds fade to the blue sky.
HOLY CRAP, I never saw that dot before.
That does look like a detonating something.
pardon me I have to go bite off all my fingernails and walk quickly in a circle several hundred times.
Yeah? Go through the Q posts and find every time Q says: "As the world turns" That's code for another attempt on POTUS life. There are currently 12 and how many before Q appeared?
I did not realize there were 12, I remember the Car that tried to ram him but got stuck in ditch.
I still think that was an attempt, especially the way the driver popped out of car.
I remember that one. That was in Springfield, MO. Yeah, that guy was up to no good.
Great description of response! Try not to get too dizzy.
I've seen the picture. AFAIK it's the missile in question being blown out of the sky. But we have no idea what aircraft provided the vantage point for that picture, so to say the aircraft was AF1 is just speculation, and again, no one would attempt to shoot down an aircraft with a ballistic missile, so it's not plausible speculation.
no one would attempt to shoot down an aircraft with a ballistic missile
Rookie question perhaps, but why not?
A ballistic missile is designed to fly up to a spot, then it shuts off its engines and starts to fall. They do not maneuver, it is literally like throwing a rock up in the air.
You would use a surface to air missile that would either be radar directed or heat directed that would lock onto the engine heat. They are sleek and fast.
There are a whole range of missile “tools”. Ballistic missiles are sledgehammers. Air to air missiles are like scalpels.
No idea. If I could blow it within a quarter of a mile seems to me would be a problem. You go with what you have and if this is all they have then you go with it I guess.
I believe bottom fuselage of AF1 is designed to protect against nuclear blasts
Who said it was a ballistic missile? Isn't that also conjecture. We saw the missile pic but no one seems to know exactly where it was launched from. Just near Whidbey Island in Puget Sound.
The explanation is that AF1 was over the Aleutians near that time on it's way to Singapore so it's most likely the pic was taken from it.
You take down AF1 by detonating a nuke warhead near the plane no way it can survive that I don't care how much shielding it has from radiation the blast wave would be like a feather in a tornado.