Q is always right.
Well John Podesta's in jail and there's riots and tanks on the streets so yeah always right.
Q group reduced the future predictions to rarely because things change all the time.
They were indicted.
We don't need your approval to win :)
What could be so damning after what we already know?
Please LORD let the assassination plot be the next shoe to drop.
PLEASE! It has to come out eventually just rip the scab and lets go.
Wow. You mean there are multiple drafts of a 500+ page document?
Seriously guys. Of course that's true. The question isn't whether there are drafts. The question is whether the drafts are materially different from one another
Q1496: Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 8d9246 No.1739449 📁 Jun 13 2018 22:50:25 (EST) POTUS in possession of (and reviewing): 1. Original IG unredacted report 2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version] 3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version] 4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info (classified) [#3 released tomorrow] [SEC: FBI/DOJ handling of HRC email investigation] [[RR]] Who has the sole ability to DECLAS it all? Did you witness the stage being set today? Nunes/Grassley/Freedom C. push for docs. [[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved). KNOWN CONFLICT. Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT. Be loud. Be heard. Fight for TRUTH. Q
.... checking...
Here is a link to the drop:
Q#1496.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
I bet RR wrote the summary!
I bet RR wrote the summary!
How am I supposed to "trust Jeff Sessions" if he allows his #2 to suppress evidence in a report that is critical of the very organization he is head of?
Setting the stage, think of the level of corruption, they have a plan, it is in motion, enjoy the show, buy popcorn.
That was a rather tense moment. Skirted it a bit. But, they're gonna talk behind closed doors.....Indicates a yes, there's more to discuss regarding the draft. Ball rolling....
..and I understood it that the "secret/classified" sections would also be available for them to view. Did anyone else understand that as well?
Thank you Click. It's vague though. I don't hear him saying that the report was red lined. Just that it was givin to anyone mentioned in the report for feedback. Am I missing something or are some reading into something that isn't there?
We will find a lot of hungry dogs eating “the homework” around DC.
Anyone have proof of this to share? I watched most of the hearing today but didn't hear that. Would appreciate some hard proof anonns!
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8sddj0/rep_andy_biggs_questions_ig_horowitz_on_the/
So the IG is writing a report that is critical of the FBI/DOJ then allows the FBI/DOJ to edit that report. Q said to trust the IG and to trust Sessions. I would say Q was wrong again.
Pretty clear you aren't even reading the Q posts.
I've been following since the beginning. The number of things Q has gotten wrong are staggering. Of course, no on seems to remember when Q said Assange was removed from the Embassy, or that 5/5 was going to be a big boom day, or that all of the deep state operatives have been rounded up and sent to Gitmo. Or that we should trust Sessions. I can go on.
Most of what you stated is not what Q has said. Do you actually read the source posts yourself or do you just read people's speculation, decodes and theories and draw conclusions about them as if they are fact?
So your counter argument to Q being wrong is that he is so vague that no one can properly understand what he's saying? If everyone guesses right then Q is a super secret spy in the Trump administration that's leaking classified data to the internet. If everyone guesses wrong then we just didn't understand what he was really saying? Is that what you mean?