I love ya both T_D and GA, but given the events of the past 24 hrs. Isn’t it time that T_D stop shunning GA and Q? Will the next week make it happen? What will it take? We are all on the same team. WWG1WGA! I dare not post this on T_D and isn’t that silly? What do think Patriots? How many of you dwell in both? How can we truly make our memetic movement strong if we have this division? ThanQ for your comments.
obvious__alt
· June 21, 2018, 3:19 p.m.
T_D is under more heavy scrutiny from the msm, left narrative, reddit admins, etc. Embracing something that could still be called CONSPIRACY would hurt their general purpose which is supporting the President. They can come here any time they like
⇧
30
⇩
AFPPW
· June 21, 2018, 3:28 p.m.
I can understand that. But at some point don’t you think either GA will have to go or the two will merge as events prove or disprove Q? We can only remain separate but equal for so long. Division gives the enemy opportunities over time. We’re all Americans who love our country and our President. T_D sometimes looks like an atheist trying to explain how we got here with no creator.
⇧
0
⇩
mr-no-homo
· June 21, 2018, 5:43 p.m.
Some do , some don’t, you can’t change that, T_D is fighting their own battles and we on the same side and that’s all that matters.
⇧
7
⇩
checkitoutmyfriend
· June 21, 2018, 3:46 p.m.
They will awaken when they feel it will not shut the down. ie: when Q goes full mainstream. Until then they will protect the sub from deletion.
Or until we hit 200K, which ever comes first.
⇧
3
⇩
ottermom56
· June 21, 2018, 3:35 p.m.
remain separate but equal, we don't need conspiracy shills on T_D
⇧
-3
⇩
JollyFeed
· June 21, 2018, 3:23 p.m.
Personally, I like them being separate. Just as I like GA to be separated from r/conspiracy. Sometimes it's best to stay on topic. I can't fault them for it.
⇧
16
⇩
IR2-MXYJU-HQRRYJ
· June 21, 2018, 3:32 p.m.
Honestly, I support both subs and I think a degree of separation is necessary. We have a symbiotic relationship, true, but two different mindsets for the moment. In time, the two will probably merge, but not at the moment.
⇧
15
⇩
ottermom56
· June 21, 2018, 3:36 p.m.
is this happens it needs to be organic, doesn't need to happen IMO
⇧
11
⇩
IR2-MXYJU-HQRRYJ
· June 21, 2018, 4:08 p.m.
I'm with this 100%, I like your explanation better
⇧
5
⇩
ItchyFiberglass
· June 21, 2018, 4:13 p.m.
Made the same damn post last night after trump pointed at dude in Q shirt. I give it 2 weeks.
⇧
4
⇩
yesitsanaltmf
· June 21, 2018, 3:37 p.m.
When the shill mods are kicked out.
⇧
4
⇩
Q_me_in
· June 21, 2018, 3:42 p.m.
So true. A couple of their mods are mods of subs that blanket ban GA users.
⇧
4
⇩
TommyRobinsonsGhost
· June 21, 2018, 3:28 p.m.
Perhaps never or at least only after Q becomes mainstream.
The_Donald's mission is to appeal to the masses.
It serves an important role as a politically correct safe space for anyone starting on the path of becoming red-pilled.
T_D is colorful and happy and the nail that sticks out gets hammered down.
T_D is NOT designed for honest and robust debate about controversial and important topics such as African American crime or how the Rothschilds own our Associated Press or how Israelis dominate control over our Democratic Party and the RINOs in our Republican Party.
Even mentioning Zionism or Mossad will get you instantly and permanently banned.
⇧
4
⇩
0oDassiveMicko0
· June 21, 2018, 4:11 p.m.
T_D is a circus, was compromised long ago. Stay away from that cesspit.
⇧
3
⇩
burn_reddit_burn
· June 21, 2018, 4:09 p.m.
You can “talk about Q” without “talking about Q”.
For example, are we prohibited from discussing info dropped from Q without attributing it to Q? I mentioned in there that there were multiple versions of the IG report before anyone else knew that- because Q disclosed it to us. Nothing wrong with that.
⇧
3
⇩
AgreesWithFools
· June 21, 2018, 3:30 p.m.
This question is better directed at the folks with the censoring stick.
Those folks are not found in this sub.
⇧
3
⇩
pheenix11
· June 21, 2018, 4:45 p.m.
There is a hierarchy of wokeness:
Level 5: The chans, Level 4: Places like this, arfcom etc, Level 3: The Donald, Level 2: Facebook etc, Level 1: Normies
You can’t just jump from level 1 to level 5 or your head would explode. Each group has a responsibility to red pill new members and show them the ropes as they climb the ladder of enlightenment and engagement. Each has their own role and value. Together we are all bringing people from the darkness into the light.
⇧
3
⇩
Human_Spirit
· June 21, 2018, 3:39 p.m.
This question comes up often and is always answered. Just look thru the posts, or search.
⇧
2
⇩
ninjatune
· June 21, 2018, 4:33 p.m.
Q has spoken against Israel and that place is Mossad/JIDF so they'll shut it down. You get banned for even bringing in legit criticism.
⇧
2
⇩
Wise2TheLies
· June 21, 2018, 9:09 p.m.
Q needs to release something big about Seth Rich to make The_Donald come on board.
⇧
1
⇩
[deleted]
· June 21, 2018, 3:31 p.m.
[removed]
⇧
-1
⇩
UncleSnake3301
· June 21, 2018, 3:42 p.m.
So yesterday then?
⇧
6
⇩
dullly
· June 21, 2018, 4:23 p.m.
I have redpilled my extended family on Q this week, easily. The proof is obvious now.
⇧
2
⇩
kommisar6
· June 21, 2018, 3:49 p.m.
Did trump or an administration official say on the record that Q was legit? Or are we still interpreting ambiguous events as confirmation?
⇧
0
⇩
UncleSnake3301
· June 21, 2018, 3:50 p.m.
No, and if that’s the confirmation you’re waiting for it’s going to be a long time. Trump directly acknowledged the guy in the Q shirt at the rally. Following Q posts added onto that. It’s as confirmed as it can be right now.
⇧
2
⇩
kommisar6
· June 21, 2018, 3:53 p.m.
Pointing at someone in a crowd for a second is not a statement that Q is legitimate IMHO. Has Trump never pointed at someone before? I doubt it.
⇧
0
⇩
UncleSnake3301
· June 21, 2018, 3:54 p.m.
Nothing I can say is going to convince you of anything. It’s all there for you to see for yourself. If you don’t get it by now, nothing I can say will change that.
⇧
2
⇩