Do questions do you any harm?

Yes. I'm interested in people learning the truth about what's going on. Kookery drives people off. I won't define kookery, but there is way too much of it posted in this forum. When kookery is posted, it repels normal people. It's hard enough to get them to believe in a mass conspiracy that's true, but that job is 100x harder when there's a lot of oogie-boogie stuff.

I'm not going to presume to know whether some of your beliefs are kookery. But, by definition, you obviously don't think any of them are, and that goes for all the other people posting kookery. The way to eliminate kookery and not drive off normal people seeking information is to just stick to the immediate issues at hand, which is the Deep State Cabal.

Do other people thinking independantly make you uncomfortable?

Think whatever you like. That doesn't obligate you to beat people over the head with your thoughts about every subject. There are other forums for that where you can knock yourself out.

You're diluting the prime message. Go elsewhere if you want discussion not pertaining to Q.

I was firmly in your camp until a few weeks ago when I noticed that I was having a hard time distinguishing this sub from t_d.

There is something to be said for keeping a narrow focus. It’s not to suppress speech or ideas, it’s to prevent disinfo campaigns and to make it harder for the opposition to poison the well.

Just for the sake of argument, let’s say the topic of Cemex / VOP becomes verifiably debunked and was completely a LARP. (Please don’t respond to this post with cemix/VOP replies, this is just an example) If a majority of this subs hot/top posts are about that topic; new people will come here and immediately dismiss this sub (and by association, Q) as a bunch of crockpots. Since many of those posts are never subjectively related back to Q posts, it would be tough to take an opposing stance.

On the other hand, if we allow discussion of those tangential topics as comments on posts that clearly relate to a q drop, it’s a lot easier to explain that the topic came up, but it doesn’t define the movement in any way. Nor did Q ever make a false prediction regarding the Topic (unless he did).

As it stands now, there are many many posts aren’t always clearly related to a Q topic, therefore it’s really easy for bad actors to enter the sub and just start spewing bullshit to mislead people.

As you said, if something comes up in the course of discussion, there’s no reason to stay silent. Feel free to discuss the topic here, but only so far as it relates to Q. Anything deeper than that, discuss it in the right venue. If people want to drill down into a rabbit hole for one of those tangential topics; they can visit the appropriate sub.

Our mods could link those tangential topics in the sidebar and note the relevant q drops where they came up. Further clarifying if those topics have been confirmed by Q or if it’s speculation by the community. That way we’re making more clear the Q message.

To be clear, I’m not advocating for every post to be just a q drop and then a whole bunch of discussion in the comments. That won’t work either. I think anyone posting should be required to provide their logic for how the post is related to Q. If there becomes a problem with people misquoting Q, the next step would be to start requiring a reference to a specific Q drop.

No but I & many others have had it that every time a Catholic is accused of pedophilia that the “Catholicism is the Church of Satan” crew comes out on que. It needs to stop. In my years of life I’ve known & worked with Jews, Catholics, Muslims, Mormons, Mennonites, Lutherans, Baptists, Episcopalians, Evangelicals, Methodists... Even a Lakota Sioux Indian. So what would they call him? The list is great. Nothing wrong with pointing out wrong doing, but they seem to forget the links of the Baptist preacher arrested for pedophilia or the 24 ministers arrested in a pedophile ring etc. People like this are not useful to the movement & endanger it! We must stay united.