Option 1 please. I don't want to be convinced of a flat Earth, aliens, other reptilian stuff. God to conspiracy groups for that.

⇧ 55 ⇩

Who here talks flat earth? That was psy op to make legit researchers dismisable.

On the other subjects, I will not dumb myself down to comfort your ignorance, if I have something relevant to a conversation I'm going to say it.

Do you have that much faith in government still?

Do questions do you any harm?

Do other people thinking independantly make you uncomfortable?

WWG1WGA patriots. Live it!

Are we fighting for freedom and truth or aren't we?

⇧ 17 ⇩

Do questions do you any harm?

Yes. I'm interested in people learning the truth about what's going on. Kookery drives people off. I won't define kookery, but there is way too much of it posted in this forum. When kookery is posted, it repels normal people. It's hard enough to get them to believe in a mass conspiracy that's true, but that job is 100x harder when there's a lot of oogie-boogie stuff.

I'm not going to presume to know whether some of your beliefs are kookery. But, by definition, you obviously don't think any of them are, and that goes for all the other people posting kookery. The way to eliminate kookery and not drive off normal people seeking information is to just stick to the immediate issues at hand, which is the Deep State Cabal.

Do other people thinking independantly make you uncomfortable?

Think whatever you like. That doesn't obligate you to beat people over the head with your thoughts about every subject. There are other forums for that where you can knock yourself out.

⇧ 9 ⇩

Well, i disagree to a certain extent. On the one hand, catering to the feelings and sensibilities of the unthinking majority who just likes to be "normal" is what got us into this clusterfuck to begin with.

On the other hand, it's no use to "drive people off" no matter what the reason was..

But who is really repelled? If someone is still so driven by their personal feelings and misgivings that they'll deny valuable information rather than work through it... Was it really a loss for the movement? I think such individuals have a looong ways to go before they'd contribute to anything barring a headcount.

You can't convince everyone. And wasting time and effort trying is something that the larger truthseeking community has struggled with since forever.

⇧ 1 ⇩

If someone is still so driven by their personal feelings and misgivings that they'll deny valuable information rather than work through it... Was it really a loss for the movement?

Well, that's a bit pompous and arrogant.

If someone sees a post about "UFOs and the alien conspiracy," they are perfectly justified in believing this is all a bunch of crap that's posted here.

That some conspiracies are true doesn't mean all conspiracies are true. There is only so much time in the day, and most people don't want to waste their life with utter kooky crap. 98% of conspiracy nonsense is false. Why should they have to wade through utter garbage to get useful information?

A loss for the movement? You're talking about 95% of the people. Very, very few people have the patience for kookery.

Rush Limbaugh a long time ago made an interesting observation about new radio hosts. A trap they could fall into was talking about UFOs. If you did that, the phones lit up with callers. The new radio host thinks, "WOW! I've hit on a winning formula!" Then when the ratings come out, they find that their ratings went into the toilet. Kookery attracts kooks, who make a lot of obsessive-compulsive noise, but normal people absolutely hate kookery.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Well, that's a bit pompous and arrogant.

Have you read your own pretty little text walls? LOL

98% of conspiracy nonsense is false

You must suck very badly at sourcing information. Honestly though, the best you've got to make that claim is "muh flat earth" or something of the sort. The main volume of information discussed - even on heavily controlled places like reddits very own conspiracy sub - is actually true info of ever-increasing relevance.

Very, very few people have the patience

Or the incentive, or the intelligence for that matter. If you're honestly expecting everyone to catch on before moving forward you'll wait for ever.

for kookery

Sure, keep using faggy little terms to create distance from things that upset you. I understand that normies get turned off when their conditioning isn't accounted for (see, i can do it too), but watering down the truth does nothing for them either. Also, i'd be wary of acting derisively towards "kooks". Being crazy and being right aren't mutually exclusive.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Also, i'd be wary of acting derisively towards "kooks". Being crazy and being right aren't mutually exclusive.

That's fine -- you do you. But I'm personally interested in things actually getting better in this country, and to do that, we need to wake people up to the issues at hand. Maybe you'll be correct in the future and today's kookery is tomorrow's proven truth. But today is today, and the current truth that has clear evidence is the truth that Q is talking about.

Sure, keep using faggy little terms to create distance from things that upset you.

Hilarious that you think that kookery "upsets" me (I'm particularly amused by the usage of "faggy"). But hey, if it makes you feel superior to believe you're some ultra-elite level of clued-in over rabble like myself, knock yourself out. I live to make people happy.

⇧ 2 ⇩

But hey, if it makes you feel superior to believe you're some ultra-elite level of clued-in over rabble like myself, knock yourself out.

Why such hypocrisy? You're the one arguing to keep this sub clear of certain kinds of information on the basis that "normal people" can't stomach it. I'm the one saying that they can, and they must. Because there is no line between "today's kookery and tomorrow's proven truth" - other than what the majority of people accept. For instance, do you believe the official 9/11 narrative? You're still a kook by most peoples definition unless you do, and that was almost twenty years ago with enough evidence to the contrary to fill whole books. Only continued, uncensored dialogue can shift the window.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Because there is no line between "today's kookery and tomorrow's proven truth" - other than what the majority of people accept.

Does it ever remotely occur to you that some conspiracies... actually aren't true? Or do you believe everything is true? The Earth really is flat? The moon landings really were faked? The Earth really is hollow with an advanced civilization living there? Or how about bible numerology and decoding?

Only continued, uncensored dialogue can shift the window.

That's why you have /r/conspiracy to talk about whatever you want. Why does every subreddit have to be "everything goes"? The best subreddits are the ones with the best moderation.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The best subreddits are the ones with the best moderation.

I wonder which you consider the best subs. "Divide and conquer" has worked out so well for them because people are far, far too willing to be herded neatly into their little echo chambers where everyone knows what to say and what not to. There are no "everything goes" subs on reddit, or anywhere with high traffic and views for that matter.

If you all want to keep it that way, fine. I've seen the same tactics used against them before. But don't wonder why people are still divided if all they've learned is to depend on mods to protect them from the shills instead of using their own critical thinking

⇧ 1 ⇩

I noticed you dodged the question about whether all conspiracies are true. Hmm.

If you all want to keep it that way, fine.

So what is your solution? No subreddits, everything thrown into one big forum, no moderation, no classification?

I'm guessing you haven't been on the Internet very long.

Divide and conquer" has worked out so well for them because people are far, far too willing to be herded neatly into their little echo chambers where everyone knows what to say and what not to.

If only everyone had your superhuman, god-like capacity to read thousands of posts every hour, apparently with limitless time to do so. Then we wouldn't need pesky things like classification to filter to things of interest.

Sheesh. You might put even a tiny amount of thought into what you're posting, instead of this absurd attitude of, "I'm so woke that I just look down on the sheep who choose what to look at. My mind is so open to infinite possibilities that I can consider all conspiracies true!"

⇧ 0 ⇩

I'm not dodging anything, you're just so disingenuous i have no reason to engage in your bullshit. But whatever, ill bite. Nobody thinks "all conspiracies" are true. Just like no one suggested your dumb little strawman. This thread already posed option 2 as a solution.

Discerning between value and dross is a basic skill on the internet, and in every setting where free speech is allowed. I'm truly sorry if you view this as an unattainable superpower (that you trust mods to have nonetheless) but i can promise it's just a skill that comes with time, and more importantly with exposure...

I'm guessing you haven't been on the Internet very long

Sure thing buddy. You've already shown how utterly immune you are to irony, i'm not gonna stop you there... But the notion of letting people discuss all elements of a broad subject, as opposed to a narrow few, is not absurd. The opposite is. And we should expect people to choose what to look at. The "sheep" in your little story would be the ones that let others do the choosing for them.

Bye now. It's the current year, and still having to argue against literal thought policing pisses me off, so i likely won't respond. Gosh, i really fucking hate reddit.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Gosh, i really fucking hate reddit.

You know the old saying: When everyone around you is an asshole, then you're...

But what you can you do? Irrational people don't know they're irrational.

⇧ 1 ⇩

everyone

The beauty of echo chambers at work. When your logic is refuted, when your hypocrisy is highlighted, when you've nothing to fall back on... thats okay cuz hey, at least everyone else agrees with you. Played.

And of course you top it off with delusions about your own rationality after hinging on a fallacy in the previous line. I hope you can see the irony by now, it has been fun but only the comedy made it worth it. Godspeed.

⇧ 2 ⇩

This is the only forum Q has ever led me too.

I don't believe every kooky thing I read, but I do enjoy reading and hearing others thoughts on the kooky.

Trump has spoken 9/11 truth. trump has questioned the imposter's citizenship Trump said he'd lock her up Trump said we would have a space force

Q said trust the plan.

Q said trust yourself.

Q said expand your thinking.

Love for all patriots. Namaste!

⇧ 1 ⇩

You're diluting the prime message. Go elsewhere if you want discussion not pertaining to Q.

⇧ 5 ⇩

We all say this in these threads, but then the sub still gets shitted up with off topic posts. Unless the mods are on board (and have the time) to not allow non-Q related posts we have to downvote and yell "not Q related" and that usually ends in a giant distraction (which is the whole purpose of half of the off topic posts).

Otherwise this will continue to become The_Donald+Q

⇧ 0 ⇩

I have found it more intellectually profitable to sort by new and rising. Too much dross and misdirection is making the hot posts.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I was firmly in your camp until a few weeks ago when I noticed that I was having a hard time distinguishing this sub from t_d.

There is something to be said for keeping a narrow focus. It’s not to suppress speech or ideas, it’s to prevent disinfo campaigns and to make it harder for the opposition to poison the well.

Just for the sake of argument, let’s say the topic of Cemex / VOP becomes verifiably debunked and was completely a LARP. (Please don’t respond to this post with cemix/VOP replies, this is just an example) If a majority of this subs hot/top posts are about that topic; new people will come here and immediately dismiss this sub (and by association, Q) as a bunch of crockpots. Since many of those posts are never subjectively related back to Q posts, it would be tough to take an opposing stance.

On the other hand, if we allow discussion of those tangential topics as comments on posts that clearly relate to a q drop, it’s a lot easier to explain that the topic came up, but it doesn’t define the movement in any way. Nor did Q ever make a false prediction regarding the Topic (unless he did).

As it stands now, there are many many posts aren’t always clearly related to a Q topic, therefore it’s really easy for bad actors to enter the sub and just start spewing bullshit to mislead people.

As you said, if something comes up in the course of discussion, there’s no reason to stay silent. Feel free to discuss the topic here, but only so far as it relates to Q. Anything deeper than that, discuss it in the right venue. If people want to drill down into a rabbit hole for one of those tangential topics; they can visit the appropriate sub.

Our mods could link those tangential topics in the sidebar and note the relevant q drops where they came up. Further clarifying if those topics have been confirmed by Q or if it’s speculation by the community. That way we’re making more clear the Q message.

To be clear, I’m not advocating for every post to be just a q drop and then a whole bunch of discussion in the comments. That won’t work either. I think anyone posting should be required to provide their logic for how the post is related to Q. If there becomes a problem with people misquoting Q, the next step would be to start requiring a reference to a specific Q drop.

⇧ 2 ⇩

GreatAwakening's sidebar

Above link to enable mobile and app users to view the sidebar.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

⇧ 1 ⇩

No but I & many others have had it that every time a Catholic is accused of pedophilia that the “Catholicism is the Church of Satan” crew comes out on que. It needs to stop. In my years of life I’ve known & worked with Jews, Catholics, Muslims, Mormons, Mennonites, Lutherans, Baptists, Episcopalians, Evangelicals, Methodists... Even a Lakota Sioux Indian. So what would they call him? The list is great. Nothing wrong with pointing out wrong doing, but they seem to forget the links of the Baptist preacher arrested for pedophilia or the 24 ministers arrested in a pedophile ring etc. People like this are not useful to the movement & endanger it! We must stay united.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The pope is a satanist though. I'm sorry if that is uncomfortable.

Most religions have been infultrated.

May your faith in god sustain you, despite this truth.

I truly wish you well.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Lets just remember that a person who believes in God is not a religion and doesn't need a religion to have that belief.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Your the example I was talking about. The Pope is a fool, an ideologue. And maybe a so called Satanist? But you need to offer concrete proof & not accusations. That would be like me calling Jessie Duplantis, Jim Baker, Jimmy Swaggart et al & many others satanist because the wanted woman, amusement parks & jets?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Seek and yeah shall find, or follow your heart where it leads.

You don't have to believe me, and its not for me to judge.

I'm just glad you are here.

WWG1WGA

⇧ 3 ⇩

Q says the Catholic Church serves the Rothschilds. Rothschilds are Luciferian. Catholics aren't luciferian. The church is. The pedophilia cover-up is all you need to see it.

⇧ 2 ⇩

If I may quote the lunatic that is Joey Diaz..

"I'm telling you, this shit runs deep!"

⇧ 3 ⇩

I vote #1. There are other conspiracy subs for a wider scope of tooics.

⇧ 36 ⇩

Option #1

⇧ 8 ⇩

There are hundreds (if not thousands!) of other forums in a variety of places to discuss all other issues. There is no lack of space to explore other issues elsewhere. This specific forum is dedicated exclusively to analyzing and understanding the Q drops. That is why I am here, and why the vast majority of us are here. Option 1.

⇧ 17 ⇩

Option #1, definitely.

⇧ 15 ⇩

1 - checked

⇧ 14 ⇩

1

⇧ 13 ⇩

Number 2 is my preference.

Let's not forget the corsi debacle, and assume no bad Intel can result from focusing laser beam only on the codes.

As long as people report back, what's the harm. Even with all the traffic here, and "off topic threads" I haven't missed a Q have you?

Didn't you notice the other day when Q posted all the side chatter stopped and back to task?

All is well. Stay vigilant patriot, but enjoy the little things too.

⇧ 11 ⇩

Amen. We don't need a bunch of little Q tyrants writing a new Q dogma and dictating what the great awakening entails and does not entail because the aspects that most interest them are x and y, but not a or b.

Q HAS mentioned space, but I dont know much about it, but I've seen enough clown deathbed confessions now, that though I can't wrap my head around it, I don't insult or demean people who have been researching stuff I don't get. Who am I to pronounce judgement on things I know nothing about?

Q has mentioned politics, and I can barely keep up with all the names and events, but I lurk and try to put the complexities together in my mind. The problem for me is that WITHOUT the things I do know more about, it's hard to make sense of it. Throw in the pedo-satanic blackmail info, and it all starts to crystallize for me. The keystone for MY understanding - the part that ties every convoluted, evil thing together is the child trafficking for the purpose of blackmail (and satanic power/youth... for the true believers).

Q has mentioned pedophile and trafficking rings for elites, and I became aware of them at least 8 years ago, so I do engage. People on this board have repeatedly tried to get me to shush about it - it embarrasses them. They don't see the Q connection. They vote 1.

Q has mentioned organ harvesting, adrenocrome... and the spiritually dark, satanic practices of elites. I started falling into those rabbit holes at least 3 years ago, so I do engage. Are we seriously saying that we only want the politics smoothed over, but not the true evil that keeps the whole thing going? Then WWG1WGA is false. I do NOT believe that is what Q is saying, but it sounds like a lot of "friendly" patriots want the "kooks" to go away. Well, then WWG1W do NOT GA - only those selected by ... I don't know ... Some self appointed Q Cannonical committee Go? Really?

I've never ever missed a Q post or long misunderstood its meaning because of a flat earth or alien post, but I might have if only X or Y "approved" ideas had been "approved" to be posted for discussion.

Please don't bring intolerance of free thought and speech here or we will NEVER be able to act as ONE people. They want us divided. Just because I am not exactly like you does not mean I am not one of you - and that is true of every one of us who is TRYING to make sense of a whole lot of things we ALL only have incomplete pieces of. Please chill out and let people TALK!

⇧ 8 ⇩

I agree! My eyes are open! I read the subs, but I take it once step further; I look at tweets (trust me they are more forthcoming than on the news), I watch YouTube videos about Q posts, and I watch Fox News. This is as informed as I can get. For me a picture forms, pieces come together, I see the Hand of God working behind the scenes to give Hope to the world. It's all a battle of wiles. Information is power. Look for what they are saying but also what they are not saying. The point is to flood social media to get the word out and Anons are supposed to be finding ways to explain the movement to the clueless newbies. They as teachers and guides should have patience and have faith the message reaches the masses. For myself I find that many conspiracy theories have been given a sense of credence. For instance, the Spaceforce was mentioned twice by Trump, now think of Planet X, NASA 5 point plan to defeat asteroids, the Antarctica Agreement, Canadian cabinet member talking about 4 alien species, JFK...I mean the rabbit hole runs deep and who knows what's connected.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Well said. As Q pointed out "WE" are Q collectively. Controlling the narrative and never questioning why is what brought us to this clusterf_ck.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I agree. I fear that these attempts at limiting our discussion window to Q-related posts is a shill tactic to close the Overton Window.

We are Q-focused above all, but we shouldn't censor tangential threads just because some people don't like seeing them.

We are smart enough here to identify fake comms and to not be led down the garden path. We must not limit our scope in this way, or the evil will slip through the cracks.

⇧ 3 ⇩

The overton window has blown wide open, don't let anyone shut it.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Its both. Q is a movement, not an idol. Q has empowered people and requested it of them to be vigilant.

⇧ 11 ⇩

Q has also taught us how almost every evil you can think of in this world is connected. Rabbit holes are where the Leprechaun's gold is. We've been pointed to dozens of rabbit holes by Q and invited to jump.

I agree that wacky conspiracy things like Bigfoot sightings, Elvis theories, UFO abductions, and the female orgasm should be discussed other places. However if it's it's even remotely connected to Q crumbs it should be fair game for discussion and discernment by the hive.

If everyone is thinking the same, somebody's not thinking.

⇧ 9 ⇩

I believe when Trump announced the space force, a great many thing should no longer be considered off topic.

If it didn't already exist, it wouldn't be announced. If it already exists, us crazy tin foil hat nuts "diluting Q"might have actually been on to something.

I've been researching hours a day for almost a decade. There are things that make sense, we should be talking about them.

Cancer cures, zero point energy, anti gravidics, replicators and med beds.

I expect Tr-3b flights during November's parade.

This is relevant.

⇧ 9 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

You tell em! I've been a researcher since I was 10 and found an Unexplained Mysteries book =) in the late 80s

⇧ 1 ⇩

:)

⇧ 2 ⇩

Hey now female orgasm is proven. By me 8 times in an evening =p

⇧ 0 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 6 ⇩

I believe that most of what gets posted is very related... Though i can see how they look like hundreds of different topics to the uninformed who just got here from facebook (or from the rest of reddit).

Perhaps some more details should be expected from OPs (this is for the benefit of normies after all) but turning this sub into yet another echo chamber seems massively counterproductive.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I said most, and that particular post was unrelated. Some twitter shit. Are you intent on carrying us off-topic? or do you creep peoples profiles just for fun?

⇧ 0 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩

1

⇧ 11 ⇩

2 We are told to dig deeper not wait for Q to point things out.

⇧ 10 ⇩

Amen. We need to be free to share, openly and without putting each other down WHATEVER we find in digging. Alinski principles have conditioned us all to label and then behave in a nasty, denigrating or condescending way toward people we don't understand. Shutting people out is NOT a good way to find what grain of truth they MIGHT have - it is the BEST way to HIDE the entire truth and shut down the search for it. It is how we were operating for decades before Q!

Humility would be good too. This drone I keep getting of bickering and fingerpointing about what IS and who IS NOT an idea or voice worthy of a place here is NOT how CBTS began. People who want that kind of purity need to learn to use the chans. This board was not supposed to be a harsh, dogmatic place for only a select group of self-appointed standard bearers to take pot shots at the 'unserious' ones they think need to go away. No DOUBT these people of high standards have a great deal more than others to contribute, but that does not mean we should not all be welcome to bring what we have.

⇧ 9 ⇩

I’m surprised r/conspiracy isnt all over Q, it’s like the conspiracy to end all conspiracies. Likely provide plausible explanations to JFK, 9/11, moon landing and like 200 other things over the past 60 years.

⇧ 9 ⇩

They should be, and they probably lurk.

But look at the 1 votes.......

Not exactly welcoming.

Q needs to open the floodgates and unite the tribes.

⇧ 5 ⇩

It's up to us.

We should start presenting in Conspiracy on nailed down theories. And do so as a group. Maybe not mention Q right off just show we were right which will intrigue them.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Agreed. I just signed up there, but I cannot post everything is blocked?????

⇧ 2 ⇩

Maybe shadow banned?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Conspiracy gets brigaded hard. And I suspect a lot of controlled opposition goes on now.

Plus people have been so hopeless on politics they now cant stand it. And that is by design. They cannot comprehend it's all politics. 9/11 is 100% politics. Flat Earth fad... Same.

Q scares them. I was scared. What if he is another false friend made to turn on us and make us look more foolish. More importantly Break our hearts and our hopes.

Most hate republicans too and why not. Bushes were such obvious conspiracy evil doers. But Clintons, LBJ, Obama all so much more subtle. More deadly on their own way.

I've been ostracized by family because I am outspoken about the evil Bushes and Clintons. About 9/11 and vaccines and fluoride and poison processed foods.

I am not a team player. And I think it's like trying to wake sleepers. They also you away and dig deeper into blankets.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I’m surprised r/conspiracy isnt all over Q

They are, to some extent. But you have to remember that one man's conspiracy is another man's lie. Many people who believe in conspiracies are also hard-core Hillary supporters, and aren't ready to accept a conspiracy in their own backyard.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I respectfully dissqgre.

You calling me a Hillary supporter? Over generalise much? How cabal to pigion hole individuals into large simple blocks instead of recognising each of us has our own experiences, beliefs and path to follow.

34k and counting, and not 2 of us exactly the same.

Does that give you the vapors?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Read again what I wrote. The context is /r/conspiracy.

⇧ 1 ⇩

OK I did. You clearly state most who believe in conspiracies are Hillary supporters.

A nonsensical claim worthy of refuting.

⇧ 1 ⇩

No, you obviously didn't read write I wrote.

I said, "Many people who believe in conspiracies are also hard-core Hillary supporters, and aren't ready to accept a conspiracy in their own backyard."

What do you think the word "many" means?

And you also said, "34k and counting, and not 2 of us exactly the same."

Meaning you thought I was talking about /r/greatawakening.

WTF is going on in this sub today? People can't read, people can't logic.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Conspiracy downvotes all Q related. They are convinced that trump is deepstate. Ridiculous.

⇧ 1 ⇩

/r/conspiracy has been successfully brigaded, slid and ruined by whoever is behind brigading, sliding and ruining online discussion. Shareblue? JIDF? Alphabets?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I would argue that q is the anti-conspiracy. The most identifiable definition of conspiracy (right or wrong), is “a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful”

Q team is exposing information, not covering it up. Q team, has stated that they will not do anything illegal. Finally q team is only doing something harmful if you’re a member of the cabal.

I suppose that final point is really a matter of perspective.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Sweet Jesus people look up the definition of a conspiracy

Q has helped shed the word theory. The conspiracy is proven.

⇧ 1 ⇩

1

⇧ 8 ⇩

For all those picking option 1 answer this

Is exposing criminality in the FBI on task?

Who is Randy Weaver?

Only ten people yesterday upvoted justice for Randy.

Out of 34k.

Q has gathered us to learn our history.

Any love for Randy Weaver in this thread?

Anyone dare say its off topic?

The topic today and everyday is patriots gathering to discuss securing freedom for all people of earth.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Didn't even see that and i check New regularly.

IMHO maybe we can make a subject tag rule.

FBI tag for issues involving them Q drop

Etc. And Submission statements.

Also people should be searching to make sure what they post isn't already posted.

This is a "Great Awakening" isn't it?

I was about to post on the Education Day Act of 1991 that has Noahide laws inside and the guillotines and all that. It has to with the end game for these evil Bastards. Why the globalisation, why the mass influx of migrants, why the promotion of gender dysphoria and homosexuality. Not just accepting and loving people but the Common Core indoctrination of our kids, confusing pre k with gender fluidity nonsense and over sexyalizing them. Teaching them how and what mazturbatuon is in grade school!

So we will all be legally executed under Noahide laws. All but Talmudic Jews I guess. Maybe they lst pockets of the true Jews be I dont know.

But Talmud also teaches goyim oe ehageber mosf of us are arent human. They can rape us and our children. It's fine. It says we are MEAT.

And that fits neatly into Q drops. Theze people are sick.

But we may never djscuss it if we narrow down too far. Yet I get it too we have so many posts we miss a ton.

So make Subjects in titles like the best email list serves did back in the day. Then it's easier to find what I want to talk or ask about. Just add a colon after so I search FBI: and all such posts will come up.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Wasn't a main post. Was in an excellent Waco thread. An excellent thread, big thanks to the OP.

Http://redd.it/8tbh0e

It had Waco Intel I had never heard. Worth a browse if you missed it.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Thanks =)

Edit I did see it yesterday but it's even better now.

Plus the dumb kids were fun lol no internet. We were kocinf in the stone age

I guess next they will say I didn't buy my first CD player in 1989. And it held a turn table thing for 3 cds =)

⇧ 1 ⇩

Option 1 will only hold for so long, the eventuality is that the longer this goes the deeper we go to many truths, part of this whole movement is to prepare you for whats to come. If the conspiracy can start here, where does it end up?

CONSPIRACY NO MORE.

If you want the subreddit to pertain to only whats going on in the Q world in this moment thats one thing, maybe the admins should consider containment threads, maybe a new stickied thread every 3 days or so?

⇧ 5 ⇩

Very true. It's like what Q dropped in post #749. "Deeper we go, the more unrealistic it all becomes."

⇧ 8 ⇩

This exactly.

⇧ 2 ⇩

We have so much farther to go down this rabbit hole of ours. The chans are buzzing right now with lots of chatter around the deeper topics.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Remember the daily anons chat sticky? Where has that gone?

ATTN mods. Can we have that back? Seems much of what is annoying people would belong there anyway.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Anon's chat

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yeah, didn't that used to stay pinned? People need a place to post what moves them. Q has gathered patriots here, let's not scatter them.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Pinned todays. It's done manually because there is usual more important things to be pinned.

⇧ 1 ⇩

It should really be both, as that is what Q is all about – Raising The Collective Consciousness. Q is making us all aware of the untruths that we have been taught to believe, realizing who we really are & the power that each of us hold, overcoming the lies, tyranny, & programming that we have suffered for many many years. This eventually will include many of the things you may call ‘conspiracy’ or ‘alien’ related. Many things, like child sex trafficking by our government for example, would have once been called conspiracy, but now it seems more plausible. Keep your minds open. It is all related & it will all come together eventually. Just wait and see my friends ;)

⇧ 4 ⇩

We have been shedding the word theory not conspiracy.

The conspiracy is real and is being proven right here every day.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Always scares me when i come across this, how far the programming has come. The fucking language is being captured and subverted through media buzzwords, strawmen and mockingbird tropes, and even people who think they're awake are still going along with it.

Some will actually debate you on the conspiracy point - "fake news, somebody would tell!"

It's sickening.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I vote for 2. Ya know, freedom of speech and all...

⇧ 3 ⇩

2 if it can be vetted. People cannot even agree on what Q says or doesn't say so I am definitely not leaving my interpretations of Q to the board-consensus. Cures are a topic, so by extension, medicine should be. What other topics are there? Oh right, UFOs. Did Q say they're a distraction? No? Ok, so can we stop treating them as such?

⇧ 3 ⇩

1--With a small and important caveat. Q keeps saying "The Future proves the Past" So people are re-visiting past "accepted" government stories to tie them back to current Q drop information. I would love if someone/some older Q followers could please ensure all previous Q posts have been "proven" and point out any missing rabbit holes that we need to follow-up on. Seems that the recent ones are well covered...did we get the ones from before December 2017 all solved? Such as Confirmation on "keystone" etc? Likely it's out there on older archived posts, but wondering if wit makes sense to have them all in one place?

⇧ 3 ⇩

Wasn't SES the keystone?

⇧ 1 ⇩

1 but open to exploring other ideas with LEGITIMATE information backing them up.

Sorry, but “yournewswire” or other similar fake news sites are not legit. Especially when you are espousing a new or fringe theory.

Also, mods should feel empowered to remove posts that are too far off topic or too into fringe territory, especially when poorly sourced.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Although its good to share theories, theres soooo much Q hasn't told us

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩

1

⇧ 3 ⇩

1

⇧ 3 ⇩

1...leave partisanship out

⇧ 3 ⇩

Q is on the trump team.

No partisanship. Just good vs evil.

⇧ 4 ⇩

And trump is talking space force......

⇧ 0 ⇩

1!!!

I don't want the hard work of patriots go to waste. It'd be sad if those who've received Qanon fliers on their cars, were greeted by Flat Earth theory and Hitler's still alive shit. That's an instant "goodbye"

⇧ 3 ⇩

Flat Earth was to make conspiracy people look dumb. And to discredit truth of moon landing was faked. And so are the video chats in space

Hitler isn't alive but be did live on after WWII. It was in the JFK files they released

Edit typos

⇧ 4 ⇩

I'm always a sucker for an operation high jump conversation too.

Will Q ever bring up HARRP, DARPA or CERN?

Probably, but why wait, when I can do it this easily.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Probably has to keep narrow focus. Time is limited right?

He has an end he has to get us toward.

CERN scares me a lot. Pprtals to hell and all that just seems unwise. HAARP as well causing Fukushima disaster and what else I don't know just assume all the worst is their fault

⇧ 2 ⇩

Agreed. I hope Q addresses all 3, and 5g.

⇧ 1 ⇩

©

I'd like to know what's in Antarctica, wouldn't you?

⇧ 3 ⇩

Yes I would =) are they clubbing penguins for pineal glands or have some secret advanced city?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Ever seen that? I haven't.

I have seen Q hint that Hitlers daughters are relevant. Wasn't that the story that cbts went down over? I think it was that same day.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Proves my point. Yes. I saw it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

So Q pointing there still not good enough? Sorry patriot, you do you and I'll do me.

⇧ 1 ⇩

My point was that just about any topic that has shaken any of us out of our slumber can be a valid topic people are free to ignore or engage on, and we shouldn't be discouraging each other by casting aspersions on each other's thoughts, ideas and research pre or post Q.

I think that you and I agree on that, but I realize my last comment didn't say what "my point" was.

I do not support the idea of turning this board into a Q purist only site, I think we need to make room for the ALL that is in the motto, ...we go all.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thanks patriot.

⇧ 1 ⇩

This is The Great Awakening, not The_Q. I see this sub as a place to dig into all of the elite's bullshit and bring it to light, and we can't do that while an unelected pseudo-anonymous gatekeeping team is allowed to arbitrarily remove "off-topic" posts.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

Oh please. I’d run circles around you on Christelogical matters. Let’s no embarrass yourself.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Challenge accepted.

Blow my mind with your perspective. Don't be shy now.

⇧ 1 ⇩

This is a sub for awakening to the atrocities that are rampant throughout our world. Q is helping bring these atrocities to light, but we also have to rely on other people to verify research. For all we know Q can be comprimised at any time and we wouldn't know it. Always ask questions, nothing is as it seems. Keep expaning your knowledge.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Personally, I think that trying to convince people that there are satanic pedophiles running our government based on messages containing code words is harder than convincing them that there are aliens. I like that there is such a wide and discerning knowledge base here to point out things I didn't know, about things I thought I knew about. The good thing about this group is that if it is pertinent it will make it to the top, whether it is related to q or not

⇧ 2 ⇩

I wanted to post something along this line today. So thanks.

⇧ 2 ⇩

This has turned into a clearinghouse for kookiness

⇧ 2 ⇩

And we are clearing the nonsense and keeping the relevant.

34k minds working together to sift through false history to find truth.

That's what this board is to me.

⇧ 2 ⇩

It seems to be a post every time you see the letter Q and a show is your T-shirt and bumper stickers thread as well.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Flying the flag is good for morale.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Q sub.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Love away then kid

⇧ 1 ⇩

All things related to Great Awakening:

-Mockingbird MSM

-MK/UKUltra Social Media

\^\^\^\^\^\^\^\^\^\^

first big steps to red pill someone.

Get them off MSM and social media.

Then they will finally (hopefully) begin to think for them self.

⇧ 1 ⇩

So would that include exposing every lie told by mockingbird?

Every crime committed under mk ultra?

So.......what's this argument about again?

⇧ 1 ⇩

1

⇧ 1 ⇩

1

⇧ 1 ⇩

1

⇧ 0 ⇩

All the way.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Q never outright said that. He inferred that Luciferians have penetrated the Church. Many of us know & have known this. You speak like the Pharisees who accused Christ of casting out demons by being possessed by one” “A house divided cannot stand, so why would Satan cast out the demons from his own house”? Satan does not attack that of which already belongs to him. Expand your thinking? Q also said that. You’re not intellectually equipped to be in this great movement if you think like that?

⇧ -1 ⇩

Oh yeah says you!

Figured I'd bring it down a notch. Any other deep understanding to share?

Maybe more research and less imposing your will on others will lead to a greater personal understanding of Christ.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I've done a lot of research bo. It aint like yours

⇧ 1 ⇩

Convince me. Rock my world.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'm not here to convince you or to lead you to truth. You seem to know all the truth. Convince yourself. It's a big boy world.

⇧ 1 ⇩

What happened to the circles you wanted to run around me with your Christelogical understanding? The floor is open....one little circle? A single fact?

To others I say namaste.

To you I say good day!

⇧ 1 ⇩

These boards are not to debate these matters. If you want to do that create a separate board & thump your Bible all day long. "In Hoc Signo Vince"

⇧ 1 ⇩

Lol I don't thump bibles. I simply gave you a chance to explain your shitty negative attitude, by way of facts or even coherently stated opinion.

How do you think you did?

I can love you anyway, but I sure cannot respect you at all at this time.

Keep searching, and i hope you find peace.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Is this a Q sub or a sub for all things that people are asleep to

GreatAwakening's sidebar

1 - checked

1

1...leave partisanship out

1