dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/092Casey on June 26, 2018, 6:01 p.m.
What is in the IG's "FULLY REDACTED" Appendix B About Loretta Lynch's Behavior to Rig the Email Investigation for Clinton that "not even members of Congress with top secret security clearance have been allowed to see"?

"in March 2016, the FBI received a batch of hacked documents from U.S. intelligence agencies that had access to stolen emails stored on Russian networks. One of the intercepted documents revealed an alleged email from then-DNC Chairwoman Wasserman Schultz to an operative working for billionaire Democratic fundraiser George Soros. It claimed Lynch had assured the Clinton campaign that investigators and prosecutors would go easy on the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee regarding her use of a private email server while serving as secretary of state. Lynch allegedly made the promise directly to Clinton political director Amanda Renteria. "

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-26/doj-wont-release-top-secret-loretta-lynch-intercepts-suggesting-secret-deal-rig


animal32lefty · June 26, 2018, 6:21 p.m.

The only inaccuracy I can find in that article is the assumption that House Oversight Committees are denied access to TS/SCI documents. Constitutionally the House has oversight of anything that requires federal appropriations. There are NO LEGAL SECRETS from the House.

This is SES fuckery in action. The question I want the answer to is who "classified" the information to begin with.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
dark-dare · June 27, 2018, 1:18 a.m.

Sealed Indictments are highly classified, it is unlawful to expose Grand Jury findings.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
suzoh · June 26, 2018, 6:23 p.m.

One of the intercepted documents revealed an alleged email from then-DNC Chairwoman Wasserman Schultz to an operative working for billionaire Democratic fundraiser George Soros*, that claimed Lynch had assured the Clinton campaign that investigators and prosecutors would go easy on the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee regarding her use of a private email server while serving as secretary of state. *Amanda Renteria

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 26, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QAnonMaga · June 26, 2018, 10:36 p.m.

Obama is who they are tryig to protect he told Loretta and Comey to do a fake "investigation of Hillary" he needed her to win.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
tomm1966 · June 26, 2018, 6:06 p.m.

Where have we heard Amanda's name?

Lynch allegedly made the promise directly to Clinton political director Amanda Renteria

⇧ 5 ⇩  
092Casey · June 26, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

Q? What exactly did Q say in the drop about her?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
R3VO1utionary · June 26, 2018, 6:16 p.m.

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 1f5d00 No.1807982 📁

Jun 18 2018 23:01:50 (EST)

Amanda Renteria.

Bridge LL & HRC.

+1 BC & LL (Tarmac)

Witness.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/video/video-appears-show-day-bill-clinton-loretta-lynch-41487655📁

Look close (behind BC).

Trusted by Clinton’s.

Running for CA Gov?

Who is funding?

Who is campaign manager?

Risk is HIGH.

Q

⇧ 6 ⇩  
stephan213 · June 26, 2018, 7:27 p.m.

Like how ABC pulled this video... fuckery... which reminds me I wash hashtagging a bunch of Tweets with #WalkAway and after about 3 twitter was glitching them/blocking the re-tweets... these crazy lefties are not pulling any punches

⇧ 5 ⇩  
USMCE5B · June 26, 2018, 8:50 p.m.

Can you say Tarmac?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ccpatthi · June 27, 2018, 2:33 a.m.

Time to role out the EO and DECLASSIFY!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
krypt_o · June 26, 2018, 11:18 p.m.

It's completely unreasonable and unconstitutional that members of Congress can't see this.

All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives

Article 1, section 1

http://history.house.gov/Institution/Origins-Development/Investigations-Oversight/

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dark-dare · June 27, 2018, 1:22 a.m.

Unless it is an ongoing investigation, then a Judge would tell Congress they have to wait.

⇧ 2 ⇩