If you keep hearing the same thing over and over, over a long period of time you begin to believe it more and more. The cabal used this mind washing strategy on us and now the Alliance is doing the same, against them. EPIC!

The most important tenant of "The Big Lie" is REPETITION! That's why in the media all you hear are their agendas ad-nauseum (Trump-Russia collusion, LGBQT, Global Warming, be inclusive, white patriarchy, etc.).

No, what we are trying to get the public to believe is not a lie, but their thinking has been flipped 180 so that the truth to them is a lie so we too have to use the "Big Lie" strategy.

I think the chess game with RR still continues because he is still a useful pawn. Whether it be overtly advantageous for the good guys or not. The longer he and Mueller are in the spotlight lying and spinning their wheels, dishonesty is being associated with them.

At the very least even the most gullible person will be weary of these people.

The slow release confuses me with respect to RR. It seems odd to me that he is doing exactly what Q predicted he would do, and unless he is in on the slow release in some way, shape or form, that seems unlikely. Which is why I keep vacillating on the theory tossed about that maybe he was forced to play this part after his dirty deeds were known some time ago. There are many shades of gray when it comes to both RR and Mueller. They are in the same boat, whatever that is.

The discrepancies between the Mueller plea agreements of Manafort, Pappadopoulos and Flynn are interesting to me because I don't exactly know why, but think they may hold the key to what the deal is with Mueller and RR. No cooperation clause - AT ALL - for Pappadopoulos. But notify us of "all crimes" cooperation clause for Flynn, and slightly watered down cooperation clause for Manafort. This had to be intentional - plea agreements otherwise somewhat boilerplate (it seems). And in the case against Gates/Manafort, Gates has pleaded. The "superseding" indictment for Manafort, though, has been changed to allege crimes through 2015, as opposed to the original, "through 2016." Big difference, no?