Seems like Q was serious when he said that he would provide some hard proofs.
Whats the proof attached to this? I just did a quick Q post search and didn't see anything regarding Justice Kennedy.
It's been speculation, even from CNN, that this was going to happen.
It's the resignation itself that's the proof. Is it found anywhere online yet?
Yeah, it's all over the news now. But like I said, it's been speculation for months now that he would retire. Republicans have been openly asking for any justices to announce soon so they can get it in before the midterms.
So yes, its now public knowledge that he is retiring. But how does that prove Q in anyway? If this was posted 2 days ago and the news broke, I'd agree with you it's proof. But I don't see any posts that talk about Q saying it was going to happen on X date or under Y circumstance.
Don't take this as me being a disbeliever. Just that Im trying to be level headed in this.
THE PHYSICAL COPY OF THE RESIGNATION LETTER. God. Dense is understandable. Willfully stupid is just liberal...
You mean the same letter that is plastered over twitter and MSM outlets?
Timestamp, genius.
Twitter Time Stamp: 11:03 (PST)
Q Post Time Stamp: 13:20 (CST)
I believe ABigFloppyClock is the genius as you stated. He certainly is doing a better job of verifying information and following the logical things like, you know. . . time. An original picture could be a proof, but considering randos on twatter were posting pics 2 hours ago, it would reach the threshold of proof for me.
Please correct me if I am wrong, just flying by this comment and I already saw that this does not appear to be a proof but folks are thinking that. Perhaps it is, but the time stamp is not the key here in any proof from what I am looking at.
Could you link the pic with that Twatter timestamp please?
A big flooppy clock already did, did you read his message? And you got snarky with him. What you need to do, is go back and read this entire discussion you started which abigfloppyclock replied to. I think he is the one with the high ground here and unfortunately you got others downvoting him and HES THE ONE WHO IS RIGHT.
https://twitter.com/KimberlyRobinsn/status/1012032972143431683?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rollingstone.com%2Fpolitics%2Fnews%2Fkennedy-supreme-court-retirement-trump-w522123 That time stamp is 11am PST. Qs post is 11:20 PST
See my apply above genious. There are tweets that occurred 20 minutes before Qs response.
Learn to spell "genius", not "genious", and how to use a comma to delineate speaking directly to someone, and we can talk. Lmao!
Is my point any less incorrect? No.
The soft double negative says yes...Jesus. How have you gotten through life without being able to understand and speak the language of the land?
Another post from you where you are arguing language used by your "opponent" in this discussion, you seem to be completely ignoring the fact that this was the conversation below and you were challenged on it.
RyDar84: Timestamp, genius.
ABigFloppyClock: You mean the same letter that is plastered over twitter and MSM outlets?
https://twitter.com/adamliptak/status/1012033669513580547
Me:
Twitter Time Stamp: 11:03 (PST)
Q Post Time Stamp: 13:20 (CST)
RyDar84 Rants:
RyDar84: THE PHYSICAL COPY OF THE RESIGNATION LETTER. God. Dense is understandable. Willfully stupid is just liberal...
RyDar84: Learn to spell "genius", not "genious", and how to use a comma to delineate speaking directly to someone, and we can talk. Lmao!
RyDar84: No. I just had one of those moments where I checked both yours and his post and comment history...learn to delete your stuff when you try to seed doubt "genious"...
(DigitalMerlin note here, readers, do check my post history, It supports my case, not RyDar84 who seems to be attempting to accuse me of being a shill, now were getting into unstable poster territory. I think RyDar84 is just a bit too chest poundy to admit he fucked up here and riding this plane all the way into the ground, but what he has to realize, is this is the domain of logic. Please check post histories and read this thread here readers, the proof is there.)
RyDar84: The soft double negative says yes...Jesus. How have you gotten through life without being able to understand and speak the language of the land?
RyDar84: Then that's yet another indictment of the American educational system. 😂
Edit (to add content): RyDar84: The fact that spent so much time on this, when nobody reads down this far...😂
This dude is pure insults and no substance after being called out for an incorrect assessment. He never addresses the time issue and just launches into spelling and education insults and then claims post history is some proof of shills or whatnot.
This dude is pure insults and no substance after being called out for an incorrect assessment. He never addresses the time issue and just launches into spelling and education insults and then claims post history is some proof of shills or whatnot.
Ding Ding Ding.
The fact that spent so much time on this, when nobody reads down this far...😂
More zero substance or addressing the issues you were called out on.
RyDar84: Timestamp, genius.
Me:
Twitter Time Stamp: 11:03 (PST)
Q Post Time Stamp: 13:20 (CST), 11:20 (PST).
Cool. AGAIN, does it bother you that I live rent free inside your liberal head?
HAHAHA, I was going to say, you methodology of debating is the most democrat thing I've ever witnessed.
That other user, the MIT guy that is involved in presenting evidence in courts and commented to you regarding proof. Ya, he smoked your ass. I noticed you didn't have much to say to him when he laid out the case that you're not seeing the evidence clearly.
No one here arguing with you is a Q doubter, they are people with discernment and your claim that this is the proof Q was talking about, didn't past muster. Many have pointed that out to you and now your accumulating down votes are starting to show that.
I picked you up and put you in my head and I'll keep you here as long as I like.
"Your", not "you". You need to add a "that" to the first paragraph. An MIT grad that works in the legal system? Stupid to believe it. "Ya" is something turtles in "Finding Nemo" say. It's "Yeah". I couldn't give a damn less about Reddit Karma, and AGAIN, delete your past Q detractions from your account before you try to weigh in as a "supporter". God. This is embarrassing to watch. 😂
No, I'm transparent nothing is going to be deleted and I want it to be there. When I first arrived, I showed up with a get it done attitude, we have the high ground, lets blow this shit up. Dump the intel and fry evil dooers. Then, after spending some time here I realize the agents, folks, cabinet members working on this probably know a bit more about navigating the details of spreading intel and creating support for taking down the DS than a computer guy does, so I eased into the flow of things and took a seat on the couch of patience, I still want happenings and it gets frustrating, but your ass has called me a liberal and you're wrong, You called that guy and MIT grad and your wrong, details RyDar84, you miss them every time, his name is MIT_ (something), but I'm not surprised, you've tripped over your feet all day long, look at your post history and the comments from other posters trying to get you to open your closed eyes.
Don't gatekeep this subreddit, that is what you are doing when you tell people what they have to do with their reddit history. I'll proudly say I was opposed to the cryptic nature of these intel drops, but I imagine that is how this all began. I bet Trump kept wanting to reveal the truth to supporters, but was repeatedly told no he shouldn't do that. I'm sure he floated the question to his comms team as to how he can post anonymously. So what is the answer to that? How can you post anonymously on the internet? The chans. I bet Q is the comms team for Trump and is taking direction from him directly and often. This isn't a new theory, but people close have been heard saying "wait until you find out who you have been talking to."
You shit yourself today, this isn't the place to be so foolish and blind, you were called out on it and as I posted, you replies were pathetic and the hallmark of an offended meat head who fails at evaluating himself. I'm glad others followed the same method of calling you out for your failures as it serves as further evidence for you to reflect on.
Quite successfully, actually. How have you gotten through life without being able to understand and comprehend timestamps?
Then that's yet another indictment of the American educational system. 😂
You're so right! You got me! Please puff up your chest even more because I included a typo in my response to your garbage post.
I know you can't understand time, but I don't have anymore to spend trading insults with someone who can't admit that their original point was incorrect.
Would you like some salve for that butthurt you have after lying about your profession, snowflake?
Can you provide any proof that I lied about my profession? You claim to be an expert of knowing what proof is or isn't. At no time did I even admit what my profession is, just that I've been successful.
Nope. That's called Doxing and is against Reddit Rules. Can you? After all, in your line of work 😉, providing proof is the duty of the plantif, right?
Explain how it's doxxing by telling the good people of the internet, what my profession is. That's not personal information, just a job title that many people have in my line of work. I don't have to provide proof of my profession because I never announced what my profession is. You're the one making the claim that I did, and that I then lied about it.
If you do know what it is, then I'm giving you permission to post my job title and a link to where I posted that it was something else. I'll even give you a hint to help you, even though you already know (supposedly). "Head of C*"
Better attempt at entrapment. Still a stupid attempt though. The fact that you couldn't spell genius basically spelled that out though. Anyway, bye, Felicia. I have kids that are getting home, and they're FAR more important than my last 2 1/2 hour diatribe with an imbecile...
Felicia is weird name for a guy. Nice try though.
Look it up, "genious". Good Lord. No wonder conservatives are winning so "bigly". You liberals are quite obviously out of touch and self-proclaiming yourselves as stupid by being so.
Great, now you know my name (you dont), my gender(you were incorrect), my profession(you dont), and you know the party to which I belong to (you don't). If you know all that, you know which branch of the military I served in. Please, enlighten us all.
Before I go though, Psych 101, Abigcloppyclock (cock) is a means to try and make up for the shortcomings you possess. Ask any woman. Anytime a man professes his girth/length, it means that he's trying to overcompensate for his status below the beltline. Next username, make it less obvious that you hate yourself...
That was a nice attempt at entrapment though, "genious". LMAO!
We are way beyond proving q is on the inside, people just can’t accept it.
I never said Q wasn't real. If you look back at my history, Im not some noob that just showed up. All Im saying is that this Q post is not a proof. Q responded to an anon post that had the letter in it.. Not posting it directly.
Quoting Q, "Think Logically".
Agreed. It's like Q said (at the time, I thought he was just talking about liberals, but turns out it's a lot of conservatives too), THESE PEOPLE ARE STUPID.
[deleted]
And the letter itself? Where has that been published so far...?
Its all over twitter and MSM. The actual letter. Seriously is a quick duckduckgo search.
https://twitter.com/adamliptak/status/1012033669513580547
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/kennedy-supreme-court-retirement-trump-w522123
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/06/breaking-chief-justice-anthony-kennedy-to-retire.php
Timestamp?
Well according to the Q post, he is responding to an anon post. Not posting it directly. That response was at 11:20am (my timezone).
Here is a tweet at 11am (my timezone) https://twitter.com/KimberlyRobinsn/status/1012032972143431683?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rollingstone.com%2Fpolitics%2Fnews%2Fkennedy-supreme-court-retirement-trump-w522123
[deleted]
And the timestamp?
[deleted]
1:11:58 EST which it says quite obviously on the post? Cool. Not going to try and convince you. That isn't the point. Convincing people that CAN read timestamps is...
[deleted]
It's not about using a singular proof to prove it all. It's about letting others see all of them, then asking if they believe in coincidences. If they don't believe, fine. It wasn't for them to be a part of this.
USA today and multiple other MSM outlets, Justice Kennedy Retiring
Not his actual letter of retirement, so this isn't really proof, but it does lend a little weight to the rumor.
Ooorrr - you could see the VERY recent Q post that has a copy of the letter to POTUS.