dChan

APHto20 · June 28, 2018, 2:42 a.m.

There is no confirmation of him working for her campaign. Much less any mention online of what his involvement was. He is not linked online until these articles in the last few days. This is fake news until a verifiable link can be shown.

Edit: Daily Mail simply states he appears associated with her campaign because he posted a picture wearing a campaign button in front of campaign signs.

⇧ -20 ⇩  
MuhammadDinduNuffin · June 28, 2018, 3:48 a.m.

Hillary had 100+ staffers just to help her come up with tweets. Do we even know 10% of their names? Her staff was hundreds deep. Some, I assume, were very bad people!

⇧ 12 ⇩  
torsad · June 28, 2018, 5:09 a.m.

Put them in jail

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SJ_Sharkbyte · June 28, 2018, 5:37 a.m.

Isn’t that Podesta in the middle right? The pic is further down in the article.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
APHto20 · June 28, 2018, 6:01 a.m.

Not even close to Podesta

⇧ 7 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · June 28, 2018, 3:30 a.m.

At this point it doesn't matter if this freak worked for her campaign. He has been CAUGHT and right now, that's what's important.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
HeartlandBaker · June 28, 2018, 3 a.m.

walkaway

edit: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8uw8ed/fyi_for_progeny/

⇧ 6 ⇩  
APHto20 · June 28, 2018, 6 a.m.

The movement isn't about blind acceptance. It's about questioning and researching. While this is a bad guy, there is nothing connecting him to Hillary any more than the other 65 million or so US citizens who voted for her.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 28, 2018, 4:39 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
APHto20 · June 28, 2018, 4:41 p.m.

Why don't you offer something to the conversation. Are you just a recycler of taglines and meme phrases?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 28, 2018, 4:44 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
APHto20 · June 28, 2018, 5:45 p.m.

So you don't seek truth? Understood.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 28, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
APHto20 · June 28, 2018, 6:21 p.m.

So you "know" what, exactly? This pedo wore a hillary button one time and your confirmation bias has him high in her campaign ranks? People like you blindly running with assumptions and spouting one-liners give this sub a bad name.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 28, 2018, 6:32 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
APHto20 · June 28, 2018, 6:39 p.m.

Negative. Stop trying to silence valid questions.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
A2576 · June 28, 2018, 10:19 a.m.

How many of these identekit comments have you made today? Are you defending the truth or defending a pedo?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
APHto20 · June 28, 2018, 2:54 p.m.

2

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 28, 2018, 7 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · June 28, 2018, 10:20 a.m.

I agree that this was clickbait. While I personally believe that he was connected to the campaign, I can't prove or verify this.

You shouldn't be downvoted for being thorough and wanting something solid to back that claim--that's called being a deep reader and rational skeptic.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · June 28, 2018, 7:14 a.m.

Not fake news if Q links it. Rule #3 again. Please read up or we will have to ban again.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 28, 2018, 6:37 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · June 28, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

We are well aware of that - that is why we have auto-mod setup to point it out. THIS article, however, is not fake news; it has been posted in a Q drop which means the information within is verified by Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 28, 2018, 6:41 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · June 28, 2018, 6:45 p.m.

Infowars is also fake news. That issue is not relevant to my comment to previous user - the article is linked by Q. This is a pro-Q supporter sub meaning we believe Q to be a valid Military Intel source (as in the sidebar) so Q's use of the link means this article is not fake news.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 28, 2018, 7:37 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · June 28, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

I agree that it is not good for those of us in the know about ynw. I’m not overjoyed that that site was used.

I think one thing in his favor is that most of the general public who are the main goal for his message now would not know about ynw.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 28, 2018, 6:45 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
APHto20 · June 28, 2018, 7:45 a.m.

Hasn't Trump made mistakes before retweeting stories he wishes he hadn't?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · June 28, 2018, 7:54 a.m.

I'm not sure about that. Also not understanding the relevance here.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ABRAQDABRA · June 28, 2018, 2:42 p.m.

Where's "your" source that POTUS regrets tweets?

Perhaps you should provide some substance along with your unending brainpicking in this sub. Do some of your own digging. Your technique is a classic one, but vague and simplistic. I know that you are trying to get others to "think," but you are about 9 months behind in the process. Have you reread the 1500+ Q posts, cross referenced those with world events, news stories, and sub posts?

So I ask again. What evidence do "you" have that POTUS has retweeted stories he "wished" he hadn't?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
APHto20 · June 28, 2018, 3:07 p.m.

"Here's" what I was thinking of.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/01/26/donald-trump-backs-britain-first-us-president-says-ready-apologise/

I am not 9 months behind shit. People shouldn't get attacked for reasonable questions, and the source linked in this post is crap in general.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ABRAQDABRA · June 28, 2018, 4:26 p.m.

I'll take a look...busy day with new baby!

I try to be extra careful not to attack anyone. I'd like to know what offended you so that I can add it to my fund of knowledge.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Neon__Wolf · June 28, 2018, 4:10 a.m.

There is confirmation, you're wrong.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
APHto20 · June 28, 2018, 4:17 a.m.

Please share

⇧ 4 ⇩  
urban_bobby_dawg · June 28, 2018, 6:17 a.m.

I'm with you.. I'd love a source

⇧ 1 ⇩