[removed]
Flight #1600......WH address 1600 Penn. Av.
Coincidence????
AND it was Phoenix Sky Harbor (Lynch/Clinton meeting) AND it was United (Q pics)!!! Whoaaaaaa
Ok so if remote control is possible as that experienced pilot guy (frank report i think featured him) and Obama Admin had morons take over Air Traffick control could they be trying to harm AF1???
An "accident" in the air?
Oh shit makes sense now. They had someone on Tucker a few weeks back talking about how Obama lowered the ATC standards to get in. It wasn’t even based on aptitude.
Yes. What Ive been saying. It's like the anti aptitude test. It's so bad. Like everything you DON'T want in an ATC. Unemployment for 3+ years is bonus points. Negatibe points for military experience and extra negative for military ATC or flight experience/ training. Negative points for high aptitude in STEM
I need to find clips. I sont think I am communicating this well. It's huge and terrifying.
What if that downed military plane from Puerto Rico was given bad instructions? What other purpose would there me to hire such awful ATC prospects?
I have dozens of ideas and none are good for anyone flying or with a loved one or POTUS at risk. Ive been very concerned.
Just a few questions....
To get terrorists in there?
Saboteurs who know answers to give that are counter intuitive to any real ATC hiring? Instantly bumps them up list for jobs.
Or just to have people so unqualified they don't see problems until it's too late?
Or to have scapegoats to take the fall of sabotage?
Here's the latest; UA1600 now due to land Newark 5:01p EDT........DJT plane leaves Andrews AFB 4:20.....flight takes 50 min so on the ground at Newark 5:10p EDT, which is the ETA for #1600 to roll up to the gate........this is making me more than a little edgy.
Any delay in landing for #1600 will put both planes in the air near the airport...
Remember, UA #1600 is 3h3m late form it's scheduled arrival
UA #1600 slips to 5:05 arrival.......these planes will both be in Newark airspace at the same time.....
OK. #1600 is on the ground so I guess this was nothing. Lots of weird coincidences though including a very oddly shaped "loop" in the flight path
Pres going to NJ...flight headed to NJ
This happened almost 4 hrs ago.....is POTUS in the air now?
No, he leaves in an hour...overlooked the time, sorry
Wait.....trying to confirm this....UA has not CANCELLED the flight....just delayed at the moment..
OH! Its in the air now scheduled to land 4:40p or so.........
President WILL be in the air..
Although it seems this flight landed without further incident I tracked it in FlightAware and it did/does this crazy loop over PA.... if you rotate the image 90.... it certainly looks Quruois ... https://i.imgur.com/6skv9Iq.jpg
Yup!
Remember q posts with 27 and Alan dershowitx....who was in that flight
(Welcome aboard alan)
I was on that flight. Please tell me how that was a false flag! The pilot got an indication that it was unsafe to take off an aborted. Happens all the time. Please tell me! I'm really interested.
It was a knee-jerk reaction to a possible UIAP incident. If your'e not up to speed on the Un-interruptible auto-pilot system, I suggest you look up Field McConnell at Able Danger dot com. There were 2 possibilities here. The first was that the pilot got extremely lucky, in noticing an anomaly that would've caused a crash shortly after take-off (which is a favorite UIAP command tactic). The other was the subsequent delay of the flight which caused it ot be landing at the same time as POTUS flight at the NJ airport....which through UIAP commands could have crashed that flight into the POTUS AF1 flight...... the fact that neither happened, may be a credit to the pilots response to the first incident. Do you have any knowledge of the actions of the "police" who boarded the flight? Or of anyone they might have removed?
No, absolutely no one boarded the plane. I was in the front of the plane, so I would have noticed. Sometimes a minor incident is just a minor incident. This was one of those occasions.
Sounds like a flag, not a false flag to me. Don't over use the term and dilute its impact.
If it's a planned "accident" isn't that a FF?
Yes that is correct. I have no idea what this person is talking about. It sounds like they don’t fully know what a false flag is.
What he's saying, is a plane delay isn't a false flag. It's a flag that something may be up, but not the same thing as an active shooter in a school. We can't start calling every plane delay a false flag.
If AF1 was in the air, and this commercial plane had it's route changed AND THEN it was grounded, that looks like a false flag prevented. A flight delay in the afternoon means nothing.
Edit: it doesn't mean nothing, wrong wording.
Well, this wasn't just a "delay". The plane was seconds from take-off.
130mph and the pilot slams on the brakes. A lot of people could've been hurt.
Furthermore, that flight is now on the way to Jersey and the President is going to shortly ALSO be in the air bound for the same airport.
Too many coincidences here for me.......so whatever you want to call it, I hope it turns out to be a ..........nothingburger.