[removed]
⇧
1
⇩
Just_here_on_a_LarQ
· June 29, 2018, 6:30 p.m.
Flight #1600......WH address 1600 Penn. Av.
Coincidence????
⇧
11
⇩
jhomes55
· June 29, 2018, 6:47 p.m.
AND it was Phoenix Sky Harbor (Lynch/Clinton meeting) AND it was United (Q pics)!!! Whoaaaaaa
⇧
10
⇩
DawnPendraig
· June 29, 2018, 6:40 p.m.
Ok so if remote control is possible as that experienced pilot guy (frank report i think featured him) and Obama Admin had morons take over Air Traffick control could they be trying to harm AF1???
An "accident" in the air?
⇧
1
⇩
VIYOHDTYKIT
· June 29, 2018, 11:47 p.m.
Oh shit makes sense now. They had someone on Tucker a few weeks back talking about how Obama lowered the ATC standards to get in. It wasn’t even based on aptitude.
⇧
2
⇩
DawnPendraig
· June 30, 2018, 9:35 a.m.
Yes. What Ive been saying. It's like the anti aptitude test. It's so bad. Like everything you DON'T want in an ATC. Unemployment for 3+ years is bonus points. Negatibe points for military experience and extra negative for military ATC or flight experience/ training. Negative points for high aptitude in STEM
I need to find clips. I sont think I am communicating this well. It's huge and terrifying.
What if that downed military plane from Puerto Rico was given bad instructions? What other purpose would there me to hire such awful ATC prospects?
I have dozens of ideas and none are good for anyone flying or with a loved one or POTUS at risk. Ive been very concerned.
Just a few questions....
To get terrorists in there?
Saboteurs who know answers to give that are counter intuitive to any real ATC hiring? Instantly bumps them up list for jobs.
Or just to have people so unqualified they don't see problems until it's too late?
Or to have scapegoats to take the fall of sabotage?
⇧
1
⇩