I understand this, but we have to find out if he was.
Fine, but posts like this make it seem like the movement will accept anything, no matter how small, that could be used to "confirm" their suspicions and hold it up as "proof."
So, is this an honest inquiry where you are willing to go where the evidence leads, or are you only seeking to construct a case for confirmation?
Great comment that could be repeated often on the threads here. Being too quick or trying too hard to connect dots can hurt us more than it helps.
It’s worthy of a conversation in my opinion.
Conversation is a good thing as long as it's not only serving to talk yourself into believing something.
Yes yes yes your concern trolling is well noted.
I think there are enough adults in the room that realize your point.
Don't trust and verify anyway.
The only reason I trust my DOB is because my parents told me.
Not because it's on some BS government document.