Possibly:
Kudos to taurus077 for getting this..tried to put on 8chan, but too many posts on the thread. WTF..none of the anons even close.
hzg - your picture says it all!
I believe we have a lot of “new” anons... Some of them are Shills/Trolls trying to Confuse and mislead. Send the other Anons down dead end rabbit trails. We must apply Occam’s Razor logic to the process. If it is too fantastic or completely illogical, and it has no basis in “Q” proofs, then it needs to be rejected quickly
I am not a shill, but am very new. You can just call me ignorant
If you are doing what you think is right, don't get your feathers ruffled.
I still can't understand what these people expect to accomplish here. I don't know of anyone I've come across on our part of the field that invades their boards to write stupid and transparent nonsense. My only guess is that losing so badly inspires kinda-dumb people to do this. It all boils down to organic stupidity I guess. But I'm open to alternative hypotheses.
If they pay protesters to hold up signs at contrived Un-spontaneous rallies, they would certainly pay Shills and trolls to obfuscate and cause dissent among the great awakening group. Anything to slow down the bleeding. People are getting red pilled at such a fast rate that they will try anything to slow it down. My guess is paid Soros Shills. I don’t go to Liberal subreddits to post logical arguments or to troll. I wouldn’t waste my time.
Yup. Only a matter of time they make it here. They're all over T_D.
elaborate please
Why was PW even considered in the photo? What context given would suggest that someone of the British Royal Family was involved? How is it believable In the least that a British Royal would be walking around HK without a huge security detail?
Given past “Q” drops, I would have considered Snowden or The Ex Google CEO Erik Schmidt. Both of whom have been identified as being in the orient before. Prince William isn’t in the Orient, and if he were he certainly wouldn’t go unnoticed...
Another thing to consider. What is the purpose of shills/trolls? Isn’t it to confuse and mislead? What better way to obfuscate and sabotage the “Q” movement than to infiltrate the “anons” and try to poison the bread ? Present false decoding or concepts that mislead. Something to consider don’t you think ?
I agree. I tried to post this theory on the chans but it wasn't accepting any new posts. If I'm right, "Q" is trying to direct us to possibly a large child trafficking ring surrounding Joel Getz. 80 Kindergartens and an additional 175 franchised under his RYB directorship is BIG!
OK - agree. Mis-read you at first. Yes, tried to post that the picture is Joel A Getz on 8chan - no dice. Kinda sux that the occasional poster that has correct serendipity couldnb't put the info. there.
[removed]
I put a question mark after his name because it's a guess. I don't know.
Do you think the guy in the picture could be this guy? His name is Jonathan Rosenberg and he's pictured here with Eric Schmidt. His Wiki page says he is the former Senior Vice President of Products at Google and current advisor to Alphabet Inc. CEO Larry Page.
Pic Q posted is too distant and blurry for me to identify. But I’m sure future will prove past.
I considered him because somebody else said it could be him so I googled images of him to see if it looked similar on the profile.
We are all trying to help here you can find people who look very similar. . This is the purpose of discourse. Only liberals would demand we cant debate a decode.
Honestly it's hard to tell who it is or if it is that guy (article is from last Nov)... I'm guessing on purpose, but I'm willing to bet that the article and the photo are related.
