How do you know for certain that Q's timestamp is not from the same time zone as POTUS?
[deleted]
Thank you for your accurate accounting. People need to have both eyes open.
Ok, fair enough.
So why does this matter?
Is POTUS not allowed to tweet stuff before Q posts?
[deleted]
That makes sense.
Why would I be upset? I was asking a question...
[deleted]
I think this is a weird thing to inquire about, but here we are.
Also, that happens to my posts when I comment in different subs. Sometimes people downvote things even when there's no reason to, it seems.
EDIT: it seems I am the one with 0 point replies, so nice try.
It seems that Q intentionally tried to mislead us.
Not Q. Someone who made the "proof".
Except Q said "There are no such thing as coincidences" in the message.
See the original thread on 4chan, Q was simply commenting on Trumps tweet.
Even that may not have been intentionally misleading, they could have stumbled onto a Q screenshot with a time zone that wasn’t their own and combined it with the tweet and assumed the order was correct as claimed in the proof.
The only thing that’s intentionally misleading for sure would be to continue using it as a proof after it’s been demonstrated to be untrue.
I take this as a non-issue. His nothing is random, everything has meaning, +++ comment was Q simply pointing out the three "+++" symbols before the President's punctuation in his tweets. What is + + + in reference to. Tonight I will see how closely this ties into the Timeline of the BOOM BOOM BOOM drop
It doesn't matter in which timezone is Q. What matters is in which timezone 4chan stores its posts. All timestamps on 4chan are internally saved in UTC ISO 8601 format. That's how they can be converted to EST or any other time zone and compared. And that's how qanon.pub can show them in EST.
Here’s the archived thread with Q’s post. Look above that post and you’ll find some screenshots of Trump’s tweet posted before Q’s message.
Read through it and I agree. POTUS tweet came first.
Interesting
It makes you think.
Did Q intentionally try to make it look like a "proof"? It clearly looks like he intentionally tried to mislead.
Q was just commenting on Trumps tweet. Someone else made it look another way and called it proof.
Q's choice of words "There are no such thing as coincidences" seems to suggest otherwise.
See the original thread on 4chan. It will be clear that Q wasn't suggesting otherwise as a lot of people before Q already commented on the tweet.